Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Oncology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98111, USA.
Dig Dis. 2013;31(1):21-9. doi: 10.1159/000343650. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
Esophageal resection remains the primary treatment for local regional esophageal cancer, although its role in superficial (T1A) cancers and squamous cell cancer is in evolution. Mortality associated with esophagectomy has historically been high but is improving with the current expectation of in-hospital mortality rates of 2-4% in high-volume centers. Most patients with regional cancers (T2-4 N0-3) are recommended for neoadjuvant therapy, which most commonly involves radiochemotherapy. Some centers have proposed treating with definitive chemoradiation and reserving surgery for patients who have persistent or recurrent disease. 'Salvage resections' are possible but are associated with higher levels of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and treatment decisions should routinely be based on multidisciplinary discussion in the tumor board. Although open surgical resection (both transthoracic and transhiatal operations) remain the most common approach, minimally invasive or hybrid operations are being done in up to 30% of procedures internationally. There are some indications that minimally invasive esophagectomy may decrease the incidence of respiratory complications and decrease length of stay. At this point, oncologic outcomes appear equivalent between open and minimally invasive procedures. Recent reviews from high-volume esophagectomy centers demonstrate that elderly patients can selectively undergo esophagectomy with the expectation of increased complications but similar mortality and survival to younger patients. Multiple studies confirm that quality of life following esophagectomy can be equivalent to the general population when surgery is done in experienced centers. Patients requiring surgical treatment of esophageal cancer should be referred to high-volume centers, especially those with established care pathways or enhanced recovery programs to improve outcomes including morbidity, mortality, survival, and quality of life.
食管切除术仍然是局部区域性食管癌的主要治疗方法,尽管其在浅层(T1A)癌症和鳞状细胞癌中的作用正在发展中。食管切除术相关的死亡率历来较高,但随着目前高容量中心院内死亡率预期为 2-4%,情况正在改善。大多数局部癌症(T2-4 N0-3)患者被推荐接受新辅助治疗,最常见的治疗方法包括放化疗。一些中心提出采用确定性放化疗,并将手术保留给持续或复发疾病的患者。“挽救性切除术”是可能的,但与更高水平的围手术期发病率和死亡率相关,并且治疗决策应常规基于肿瘤委员会的多学科讨论。尽管开放性外科切除术(经胸和经食管裂孔手术)仍然是最常见的方法,但国际上多达 30%的手术采用微创或混合手术。有一些迹象表明微创食管切除术可能降低呼吸并发症的发生率并缩短住院时间。目前,开放性和微创性手术之间的肿瘤学结果似乎相当。来自大容量食管切除术中心的最新综述表明,老年患者可以选择性地进行食管切除术,预计会增加并发症,但与年轻患者的死亡率和生存率相当。多项研究证实,当在经验丰富的中心进行手术时,食管癌患者手术后的生活质量可以与普通人群相当。需要手术治疗食管癌的患者应转诊至大容量中心,尤其是那些具有既定护理途径或强化康复计划的中心,以改善包括发病率、死亡率、生存率和生活质量在内的结果。