• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

献血作为一种公共物品:搭便车问题的实证研究。

Blood donation as a public good: an empirical investigation of the free rider problem.

作者信息

Abásolo Ignacio, Tsuchiya Aki

机构信息

Departamento de Economía de las Instituciones, Estadística Económica y Econometría, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de La Laguna, Campus de Guajara, 38071, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain,

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Apr;15(3):313-21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0496-x. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-013-0496-x
PMID:23797489
Abstract

A voluntary blood donation system can be seen as a public good. People can take advantage without contributing and have a free ride. We empirically analyse the extent of free riding and its determinants. Interviews of the general public in Spain (n = 1,211) were used to ask whether respondents were (or have been) regular blood donors and, if not, the reason. Free riders are defined as those who are medically capable to donate blood but do not. In addition, we distinguish four different types of free riding depending on the reason given for not donating. Binomial and multinomial logit models estimate the effect of individual characteristics on the propensity to free ride and the likelihood of the free rider types. Amongst those who are able to donate, there is a 67 % probability of being a free rider. The most likely free rider is female, single, with low/no education and abstained from voting in a recent national election. Gender, age, religious practice, political participation and regional income explain the type of free rider.

摘要

自愿献血系统可被视为一种公共物品。人们可以不做贡献却从中受益,即搭便车。我们对搭便车的程度及其决定因素进行了实证分析。通过对西班牙公众(n = 1211)进行访谈,询问受访者是否是(或曾经是)定期献血者,若不是,则询问原因。搭便车者被定义为那些有医学能力献血但却不献血的人。此外,我们根据不献血的原因区分了四种不同类型的搭便车行为。二项式和多项逻辑回归模型估计了个体特征对搭便车倾向以及不同类型搭便车者可能性的影响。在有能力献血的人群中,成为搭便车者的概率为67%。最有可能成为搭便车者的是女性、单身、受教育程度低/未受过教育且在近期全国选举中未投票的人。性别、年龄、宗教活动、政治参与和地区收入解释了搭便车者的类型。

相似文献

1
Blood donation as a public good: an empirical investigation of the free rider problem.献血作为一种公共物品:搭便车问题的实证研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Apr;15(3):313-21. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0496-x. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
2
How to reverse first time donors to become regular donors? A questionnaire survey in Estonia.如何让首次献血者转变为定期献血者?爱沙尼亚的一项问卷调查。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2017 Nov;24(4):404-409. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
3
The blood donation experience: self-reported motives and obstacles for donating blood.献血经历:自我报告的献血动机与障碍
Vox Sang. 2008 Jan;94(1):56-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2007.00990.x.
4
Predicting a donor's likelihood of donating within a preselected time interval.
Transfus Med. 2000 Sep;10(3):181-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.2000.00251.x.
5
Why some donors are more willing to donate platelets? ----a qualitative study on 25 regular platelet donors in Guangzhou, China.为什么有些献血者更愿意捐献血小板?——一项对中国广州 25 名定期血小板献血者的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):1671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7783-0.
6
Blood donors' preferences for blood donation for biomedical research.献血者对用于生物医学研究的献血的偏好。
Transfusion. 2018 Jul;58(7):1640-1646. doi: 10.1111/trf.14596. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
7
Blood donors' knowledge and attitude towards blood donation at North Gondar district blood bank, Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔北区血库献血者对献血的知识和态度:一项横断面研究
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Nov 6;12(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4776-0.
8
The social context of motorcycle riding and the key determinants influencing rider behavior: a qualitative investigation.摩托车骑行的社会背景和影响骑手行为的关键决定因素:一项定性研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Aug;12(4):363-76. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.577653.
9
Measuring public awareness about blood donation in Assir, South-Western Saudi Arabia.测量沙特阿拉伯西南部阿西尔地区民众对献血的认知度。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2020 Aug;27(3):122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
10
Blood donation practices and willingness to donate among residents of an urban slum in Lagos Nigeria.尼日利亚拉各斯一个城市贫民窟居民的献血行为及献血意愿
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2014 Mar;21(1):21-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Public's Self-Avoidance and Other-Reliance in the Reporting of Medical Insurance Fraud: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.公众在医疗保险欺诈举报中的自我回避与依赖他人:一项中国的横断面调查
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Dec 22;16:2869-2881. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S438854. eCollection 2023.
2
Warming up cool cooperators.温暖冷漠的合作者。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1917-1932. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01687-6. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Trust and distrust: Identifying recruitment targets for ethnic minority blood donors.信任与不信任:确定少数民族献血者的招募目标。

本文引用的文献

1
Blood donation and the nature of altruism.献血与利他主义的本质。
J Health Econ. 2009 Mar;28(2):492-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.11.005. Epub 2008 Dec 7.
2
The psychology of blood donation: current research and future directions.献血心理学:当前研究与未来方向
Transfus Med Rev. 2008 Jul;22(3):215-33. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2008.02.005.
3
role of altruistic behavior, empathetic concern, and social responsibility motivation in blood donation behavior.利他行为、同理心关怀和社会责任动机在献血行为中的作用。
Transfus Med. 2022 Aug;32(4):276-287. doi: 10.1111/tme.12867. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Individual, contextual and network characteristics of blood donors and non-donors: a systematic review of recent literature.献血者和非献血者的个体、环境和网络特征:近期文献的系统评价。
Blood Transfus. 2017 Sep;15(5):382-397. doi: 10.2450/2017.0064-17. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
5
Egalitarianism and altruism in health: some evidence of their relationship.平等主义和利他主义与健康:一些相关证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2014 Feb 6;13:13. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-13-13.
Transfusion. 2008 Jan;48(1):43-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01481.x. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
4
What population factors influence the decision to donate blood?哪些人口因素会影响献血的决定?
Transfus Med. 2004 Feb;14(1):9-12. doi: 10.1111/j.0958-7578.2004.00473.x.
5
Altruism and commerce: a defense of Titmuss against Arrow.
Philos Public Aff. 1973 Spring;2(3):312-20.
6
Blood donor behaviour in Greece: implications for health policy.
Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(10):1461-7. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90284-4.