• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者经静脉导线拔除术的安全性和有效性。

Safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction in elderly patients.

作者信息

Kutarski Andrzej, Polewczyk Anna, Boczar Krzysztof, Ząbek Andrzej, Polewczyk Maciej

机构信息

2nd Department of Clinical Cardiology, Swietokrzyskie Cardiology Center, Kielce, Poland.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2014;21(1):47-52. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0084. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2013.0084
PMID:23799557
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a considerable controversy regarding safety of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in elderly patients due to their potentially worse general condition, more concomitant diseases, more difficult sedation or analgesia. Moreover, the present experience is not relevant. The aim of the study was the comparison of safety and feasibility of TLE in elderly and middle-aged patients.

METHODS

We have extracted an ingrown pacemaker (PM)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads from 1,060 adult patients (21-70 years) and 192 octogenarians (mean age 83.4 ± 3.1 years) using standard mechanical systems within the last 7 years. We compared effectiveness and complications of the TLE procedures in the two mentioned groups of patients.

RESULTS

There were more women in octogenarians referred for TLE (45.3% vs. 36.9%). In addition, more pocket infections (37.0% vs. 24.5%), less non-infective indications for PM (46.9% vs. 57.7%) and ICD systems (7.3% vs. 28.8%) TLE were observed in this group. Leads body dwelling time was similar (76.4 ± 56.8 vs. 83.5 ± 63.0) in both groups. Procedure efficacy (full radiological success 97.4% vs. 94.6%, partial radiological success 2.6% vs. 4.34%), safety measures (major complications 1.6% vs. 1.51%, minor complications 1.0% vs. 1.9%) were similar in both compared groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Old age does not influence TLE effectiveness. Therefore, TLE can be safely and successfully performed in octogenarians.

摘要

背景

由于老年患者的一般状况可能较差、合并疾病更多、镇静或镇痛更困难,经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)在老年患者中的安全性存在相当大的争议。此外,目前的经验并不适用。本研究的目的是比较老年和中年患者TLE的安全性和可行性。

方法

在过去7年中,我们使用标准机械系统从1060例成年患者(21 - 70岁)和192例八旬老人(平均年龄83.4±3.1岁)中拔除了植入性心脏起搏器(PM)/植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线。我们比较了上述两组患者TLE手术的有效性和并发症。

结果

接受TLE的八旬老人中女性更多(45.3%对36.9%)。此外,该组中观察到更多的囊袋感染(37.0%对24.5%)、PM(46.9%对57.7%)和ICD系统(7.3%对28.8%)TLE的非感染性指征更少。两组导线体内留置时间相似(76.4±56.8对83.5±63.0)。比较的两组手术疗效(完全放射学成功97.4%对94.6%,部分放射学成功2.6%对4.34%)、安全措施(主要并发症1.6%对1.51%,次要并发症1.0%对1.9%)相似。

结论

高龄不影响TLE的有效性。因此,八旬老人可以安全、成功地进行TLE。

相似文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction in elderly patients.老年患者经静脉导线拔除术的安全性和有效性。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(1):47-52. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0084. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
2
The analysis of indications and early results of transvenous lead extraction in patients with a pacemaker, ICD and CRT - single-center experience.起搏器、植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)和心脏再同步治疗(CRT)患者经静脉导线拔除的适应证分析及早期结果——单中心经验
Acta Cardiol. 2015 Dec;70(6):685-92. doi: 10.2143/AC.70.6.3120181.
3
Transvenous extraction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory--a comparison of Riata, Sprint Fidelis, and non-recalled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.经皮心内膜下心导管取出术在咨询下进行——比较 Riata、Sprint Fidelis 和未召回的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Oct;10(10):1444-50. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
4
The effectiveness of transvenous leads extractions implanted more than 10 years before.10多年前植入的经静脉导线拔除的有效性。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(4):419-24. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0143. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
5
Safety and effectiveness of transvenous extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in patients under or over 80 years of age.经静脉取出起搏器和植入式心脏复律除颤器导线在 80 岁以下和 80 岁以上患者中的安全性和有效性。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(2):130-5. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0005.
6
Risk Factors and Long-Term Survival of Octogenarians and Nonagenarians Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction Procedures.八旬和九旬患者行经静脉心脏起搏器和除颤器导线拔除术的风险因素和长期生存。
Gerontology. 2021;67(1):36-48. doi: 10.1159/000511358. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
7
Safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction in octogenarians.80 岁以上患者经静脉心内膜导线拔除术的安全性和有效性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;23(10):1103-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02372.x. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
8
Lead dependent tricuspid dysfunction: Analysis of the mechanism and management in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction.依赖于 Lead 的三尖瓣功能障碍:经静脉 Lead 拔除术患者的机制和处理分析。
Cardiol J. 2013;20(4):402-10. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0099.
9
Clinical predictors of adverse patient outcomes in an experience of more than 5000 chronic endovascular pacemaker and defibrillator lead extractions.在超过 5000 例慢性血管内起搏器和除颤器导联拔除的经验中,预测患者不良结局的临床因素。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 May;11(5):799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
10
Late complications of electrotherapy - a clinical analysis of indications for transvenous removal of endocardial leads: a single centre experience.电疗的晚期并发症 - 经静脉心内膜导线取出适应证的临床分析:单中心经验。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(4):366-72. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0064.

引用本文的文献

1
Octogenarian patients and laser-assisted lead extraction: Should we put a limit?八旬老人患者和激光辅助导线拔除术:我们是否应该设限?
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 20;18(10):e0284802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284802. eCollection 2023.
2
Lead management in patients undergoing percutaneous tricuspid valve replacement or repair: a 'heart team' approach.经皮三尖瓣置换或修复术患者的导管理:一种“心脏团队”方法。
Europace. 2023 Nov 2;25(11). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad300.
3
Leadless cardiac pacemaker implantations after infected pacemaker system removals in octogenarians.
八旬老人感染起搏器系统移除术后的无导线心脏起搏器植入术。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2021 Jul 28;18(7):505-513. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2021.07.006.
4
Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in the Chinese octogenarian patients.经静脉导线拔除术在 80 岁以上中国患者中的疗效和安全性。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jul;44(7):971-977. doi: 10.1002/clc.23629. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Extraction in Elderly Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.老年患者心血管植入式电子装置取出术的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Oct;1(4):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
Echocardiographic assessment of residuals after transvenous intracardiac lead extraction.经静脉心内导线拔除术后残余情况的超声心动图评估
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;36(3):423-430. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01731-5. Epub 2019 Nov 16.
7
Risk Factors Predicting Complications of Transvenous Lead Extraction.经静脉心脏导线拔除术并发症的预测因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 18;2018:8796704. doi: 10.1155/2018/8796704. eCollection 2018.