• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便免疫化学检测评估
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Oct;4(4):245-50. doi: 10.1177/2150131913487561. Epub 2013 May 12.
2
Which Fecal Immunochemical Test Should I Choose?我应该选择哪种粪便免疫化学检测?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):264-277. doi: 10.1177/2150131917705206. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Population screening for colorectal cancer means getting FIT: the past, present, and future of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT).人群结直肠癌筛查意味着使用粪便免疫化学试验检测血红蛋白(FIT)进行 FIT:结直肠癌筛查的过去、现在和未来。
Gut Liver. 2014 Mar;8(2):117-30. doi: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.2.117. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
4
Colorectal Cancer Screening With Traditional and New-generation Fecal Immunochemical Tests: A Critical Review of Fecal Occult Blood Tests.结直肠癌筛查:传统与新一代粪便免疫化学检测方法的比较——粪便潜血试验的批判性回顾
Anticancer Res. 2020 Feb;40(2):575-581. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13987.
5
Colorectal cancer detection in an asymptomatic population: fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin vs. fecal M2-type pyruvate kinase.无症状人群中的结直肠癌检测:血红蛋白粪便免疫化学检测与粪便M2型丙酮酸激酶检测的比较
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(1):114-20. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.012.
6
A quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasia.一种用于结直肠肿瘤的定量免疫化学粪便潜血试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Feb 20;146(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-4-200702200-00003.
7
Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌美国多学会专家组关于粪便免疫化学检测用于结直肠肿瘤筛查的共识声明。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Apr;152(5):1217-1237.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.08.053. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Difference in performance of fecal immunochemical tests with the same hemoglobin cutoff concentration in a nationwide colorectal cancer screening program.全国结直肠癌筛查项目中相同血红蛋白截断值的粪便免疫化学检测性能差异。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1317-26. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
9
Comparison of a brush-sampling fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin with a sensitive guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in detection of colorectal neoplasia.用于检测血红蛋白的刷取粪便免疫化学检测法与基于愈创木脂的灵敏粪便潜血检测法在结直肠肿瘤检测中的比较。
Cancer. 2006 Nov 1;107(9):2152-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22230.
10
Fecal Immunochemical Test: The World's Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.粪便免疫化学检测:世界领先的结直肠癌筛查检测。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):511-526. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Performance of Common Fecal Immunochemical Tests : A Cross-Sectional Study.常见粪便免疫化学检测的比较性能:一项横断面研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Oct;177(10):1350-1360. doi: 10.7326/M24-0080. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Comparative effectiveness of five fecal immunochemical tests using colonoscopy as the gold standard: study protocol.五种粪便免疫化学检测方法与结肠镜检查对照的有效性研究:研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Jul;106:106430. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106430. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
An early report of a screening program for colorectal cancer in Guangzhou, China.中国广州一项结直肠癌筛查项目的早期报告。
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Nov;7(21):604. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.75.
4
Learning to be More Positive About FIT.学会更加积极地看待 FIT。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1757-1759. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0400-5. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal adenomas: assessment of detectability and genetic heterogeneity.结直肠腺瘤患者循环肿瘤 DNA:检测能力和遗传异质性评估。
Cell Death Dis. 2018 Aug 30;9(9):894. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0934-x.
6
"Finding the Right FIT": Rural Patient Preferences for Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Characteristics.“找到合适的匹配度”:农村患者对粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)特征的偏好
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Sep-Oct;30(5):632-644. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.05.170151.
7
Which Fecal Immunochemical Test Should I Choose?我应该选择哪种粪便免疫化学检测?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):264-277. doi: 10.1177/2150131917705206. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
8
Effect of Ambient Temperature Variations on Positivity of Manual Fecal Immunochemical Tests.环境温度变化对粪便潜血免疫化学检测阳性率的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2015 Oct;6(4):243-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131915588738. Epub 2015 May 28.
9
Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)与光学结肠镜检查的比较的检测特性。
J Med Screen. 2014 Sep;21(3):133-43. doi: 10.1177/0969141314541109. Epub 2014 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The "Iowa get screened" colon cancer screening program.爱荷华州结肠癌筛查项目“我要接受筛查”。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2010 Apr 1;1(1):43-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131909352191.
2
Quality and the college of american pathologists.质量与美国病理学家学院。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Nov;135(11):1441. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0287-SA.
3
Organized colorectal cancer screening in integrated health care systems.在综合医疗保健系统中开展有组织的结直肠癌筛查。
Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:101-10. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr007. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
4
The effectiveness of the FLU-FOBT program in primary care a randomized trial.在初级保健中 FLU-FOBT 方案的效果:一项随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.011.
5
Analytical comparison of three quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.三种用于结直肠癌筛查的定量免疫化学粪便隐血试验的分析比较。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jul;20(7):1492-501. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0594. Epub 2011 May 16.
6
Cascade colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a global conceptual model.级联结直肠癌筛查指南:一个全球概念模型。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;45(4):297-300. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182098e07.
7
Higher fecal immunochemical test cutoff levels: lower positivity rates but still acceptable detection rates for early-stage colorectal cancers.更高的粪便免疫化学检测截断值:较低的阳性率,但对早期结直肠癌仍有可接受的检出率。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Feb;20(2):272-80. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0848. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
8
Comparison of immunochemical and guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in screening and surveillance for advanced colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.免疫化学法和愈创木脂法粪便隐血试验在筛查和监测结直肠高级别瘤变中的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Dig Dis. 2010 Jun;11(3):148-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2010.00430.x.
9
Comparison of guaiac-based and quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood testing in a population at average risk undergoing colorectal cancer screening.在平均风险的结直肠癌筛查人群中,基于愈创木脂的和定量免疫化学粪便隐血检测的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep;105(9):2017-25. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.179. Epub 2010 May 25.
10
Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer.全球结直肠癌的差异。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):366-78. doi: 10.3322/caac.20038.

用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便免疫化学检测评估

Evaluation of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Daly Jeanette M, Bay Camden P, Levy Barcey T

机构信息

The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Oct;4(4):245-50. doi: 10.1177/2150131913487561. Epub 2013 May 12.

DOI:10.1177/2150131913487561
PMID:23799674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3879722/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces the mortality due to CRC. It is important for health care providers to be aware of the variation in the products available for CRC screening.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to summarize the accuracy of results of individual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) products across pathology proficiency testing programs.

METHODS

Secondary data analysis of proficiency testing programs' FIT results.

RESULTS

Four of 7 proficiency testing program's FIT evaluations were obtained for a 2-year period. Fourteen unique FIT brands were evaluated by at least 1 of the 4 proficiency testing programs. Five of the products performed similarly with sensitivities ranging from 98.1% to 98.8% and specificities from 98.1% to 99.6%. Ninety-three percent of the FIT tests completed were manual Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-waived FITs.

CONCLUSIONS

About two thirds of the commonly used FIT products performed acceptably on spiked samples of human hemoglobin. However, some had low sensitivity and specificity and probably should not be used for population-based or other screening. Further investigation to determine appropriate, reliable products for fecal occult blood testing is warranted.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)筛查可降低CRC导致的死亡率。医疗保健提供者了解CRC筛查可用产品的差异很重要。

目的

本研究的目的是总结各粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)产品在病理学能力验证计划中的结果准确性。

方法

对能力验证计划的FIT结果进行二次数据分析。

结果

在两年期间获得了7个能力验证计划中4个计划的FIT评估结果。14个不同的FIT品牌至少由4个能力验证计划中的1个进行了评估。其中5种产品表现相似,灵敏度范围为98.1%至98.8%,特异性范围为98.1%至99.6%。完成的FIT检测中有93%是经临床实验室改进修正案豁免的手动FIT检测。

结论

约三分之二的常用FIT产品在人血红蛋白加标样本上表现可接受。然而,有些产品的灵敏度和特异性较低,可能不应将其用于基于人群的筛查或其他筛查。有必要进一步调查以确定用于粪便潜血检测的合适、可靠产品。