• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为未参保患者提供护理能否减少急诊就诊和住院次数?

Does providing care for uninsured patients decrease emergency room visits and hospitalizations?

作者信息

Mackinney Ted, Visotcky Alexis M, Tarima Sergey, Whittle Jeff

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):135-42. doi: 10.1177/2150131913478981. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1177/2150131913478981
PMID:23799722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4818592/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to primary care could reduce use of more costly health care by uninsured individuals through prevention and early treatment. We analyzed data from a program providing free primary care to test this hypothesis.

METHODS

We compared emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations among uninsured, low-income adults who received immediate versus delayed access to a program providing free primary care, including labs, X-rays, and specialty consultation. We used surveys to identify ER visits and hospitalizations during the 12 months preceding and following program enrollment or wait list entry.

RESULTS

Hospitalizations decreased from the year before entry to the year following entry in participants with immediate and delayed (6.0% vs 8.8% decrease) access. ER use also decreased in both groups (11.2% vs 15.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Free primary care services and specialty consultation did not reduce use of more costly health care services during its first year. More prolonged availability of primary care might have greater impact.

摘要

背景

通过预防和早期治疗,获得初级保健服务可以减少未参保个体对成本更高的医疗保健服务的使用。我们分析了一个提供免费初级保健服务项目的数据,以验证这一假设。

方法

我们比较了未参保的低收入成年人中,立即获得与延迟获得包括实验室检查、X光检查和专科会诊在内的免费初级保健服务项目的人群的急诊室就诊和住院情况。我们通过调查来确定在项目登记或进入等候名单之前及之后12个月内的急诊室就诊和住院情况。

结果

立即获得和延迟获得服务的参与者,从进入项目前一年到进入项目后一年,住院率均有所下降(分别下降6.0%和8.8%)。两组的急诊室就诊率也都有所下降(分别下降11.2%和15.4%)。

结论

免费初级保健服务和专科会诊在第一年并没有减少对成本更高的医疗保健服务的使用。初级保健服务的更长时间提供可能会产生更大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b44/4818592/883dfc110adf/nihms772289f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b44/4818592/883dfc110adf/nihms772289f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b44/4818592/883dfc110adf/nihms772289f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Does providing care for uninsured patients decrease emergency room visits and hospitalizations?为未参保患者提供护理能否减少急诊就诊和住院次数?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):135-42. doi: 10.1177/2150131913478981. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
2
Theory and the fallacy of misplaced concreteness.理论与具体性误置的谬误。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Oct;4(4):238-9. doi: 10.1177/2150131913494711. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
3
The effects of a community-based partnership, Project Access Dallas (PAD), on emergency department utilization and costs among the uninsured.基于社区的伙伴关系——达拉斯项目接入(PAD)对无保险人群急诊利用和成本的影响。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Dec;34(4):577-83. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds027. Epub 2012 May 31.
4
Does access to comprehensive outpatient care alter patterns of emergency department utilization among uninsured patients in East Baltimore?在东巴尔的摩,获得全面门诊护理是否会改变未参保患者的急诊科就诊模式?
J Prim Care Community Health. 2013 Apr 1;4(2):143-7. doi: 10.1177/2150131913477116. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
5
Presence of a community health center and uninsured emergency department visit rates in rural counties.农村县社区卫生中心的存在与未参保者急诊就诊率
J Rural Health. 2009 Winter;25(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00193.x.
6
TennCare disenrollment and avoidable hospital visits in Davidson County, Tennessee.田纳西州戴维森县的 TennCare 退保与可避免的医院就诊情况
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Feb;23(1):425-45. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0002.
7
Program for uninsured cuts ED visits, admissions.针对未参保者的项目减少了急诊就诊和住院人数。
Hosp Case Manag. 2012 Oct;20(10):154-5.
8
Psychiatric Emergency Department Visits After Regional Expansion of Community Health Centers.社区卫生中心区域扩张后的精神科急诊就诊情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Oct 1;70(10):901-906. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800553. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Improving Outcomes of Care for HRSA-Funded Health Center Patients Who Have Mental Health Conditions and Substance Use Disorders.改善接受 HRSA 资助的同时患有心理健康问题和物质使用障碍的卫生保健中心患者的护理结果。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr;47(2):168-188. doi: 10.1007/s11414-019-09665-5.
10
No room at the inn: a snapshot of an American emergency room.旅店没有空房:美国急诊室一瞥。
Stanford Law Rev. 1994 Jan;46(2):449-501.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Social Risk Factors and Emergency Department Use: National Health Interview Survey 2016-2018.社会风险因素与急诊科就诊之间的关系:2016 - 2018年国家健康访谈调查
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;26(2):307-314. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18616.
2
Evaluating Intensity, Complexity, and Potential for Causal Inference in Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.评估社会需求干预措施的强度、复杂性和因果推断的可能性:对一项范围综述的综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417994. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17994.
3
Racial Health Equity and Social Needs Interventions: A Review of a Scoping Review.种族健康公平与社会需求干预:一项系统评价综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250654. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50654.
4
Evaluation of an Electronic Health Record Referral Process to Enhance Participation in Evidence-Based Arthritis Interventions.评价电子健康记录转介流程,以增强参与基于证据的关节炎干预措施的效果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 May 13;18:E46. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200484.
5
Interventions and strategies involving primary healthcare professionals to manage emergency department overcrowding: a scoping review.涉及初级保健专业人员的干预措施和策略,以管理急诊科过度拥挤:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 10;11(5):e048613. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048613.
6
Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations.组织创新组件的类型学:改善弱势群体获得基本医疗服务的途径。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 6;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01263-8.
7
Implementing a Social Determinants Screening and Referral Infrastructure During Routine Emergency Department Visits, Utah, 2017-2018.在常规急诊就诊期间实施社会决定因素筛查和转介基础设施,犹他州,2017-2018 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jun 18;17:E45. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.190339.
8
Socioeconomic disparities in the complexity of hernias evaluated at Emergency Departments across the United States.美国各地急诊部评估的疝病复杂性的社会经济差异。
Am J Surg. 2019 Sep;218(3):551-559. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.042. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of a Low-Cost, Hospital-Based Primary Care Clinic.一家低成本的医院基层医疗诊所的成本效益
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2014 Dec 12;1:2333392814557011. doi: 10.1177/2333392814557011. eCollection 2014 Jan-Dec.
10
Organizational interventions improving access to community-based primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review.改善弱势群体获得社区初级卫生保健机会的组织干预措施:一项范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 10;15(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0459-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2009.美国成年人健康统计摘要:2009年国家健康访谈调查
Vital Health Stat 10. 2010 Dec(249):1-207.
2
Uninsured adults presenting to US emergency departments: assumptions vs data.前往美国急诊科的未参保成年人:假设与数据
JAMA. 2008 Oct 22;300(16):1914-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.16.1914.
3
Local access to care programs (LACPs): new developments in the access to care for the uninsured.本地医疗服务获取项目(LACPs):为未参保者提供医疗服务的新进展。
Milbank Q. 2008 Sep;86(3):459-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00529.x.
4
A national study of chronic disease prevalence and access to care in uninsured U.S. adults.一项关于美国未参保成年人慢性病患病率及医疗服务可及性的全国性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):170-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00006.
5
The effects of race and insurance on potentially avoidable hospitalizations in Tennessee.种族和保险对田纳西州潜在可避免住院情况的影响。
Med Care Res Rev. 2008 Oct;65(5):596-616. doi: 10.1177/1077558708318283. Epub 2008 May 15.
6
Health insurance and access to health care in the United States.美国的医疗保险与医疗服务可及性。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:149-60. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.007. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
7
Using inverse probability-weighted estimators in comparative effectiveness analyses with observational databases.在使用观察性数据库进行的比较有效性分析中使用逆概率加权估计量。
Med Care. 2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S103-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806518ac.
8
Is there a (volunteer) doctor in the house? Free clinics and volunteer physician referral networks in the United States.这屋里有(志愿)医生吗?美国的免费诊所和志愿医生转诊网络。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):871-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.871.
9
Emergency room use and access to primary care: evidence from Houston, Texas.急诊室的使用情况及初级医疗服务的可及性:来自德克萨斯州休斯顿的证据
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 Aug;17(3):610-24. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2006.0098.
10
Changes in health for the uninsured after reaching age-eligibility for Medicare.达到医疗保险年龄资格后,未参保者的健康状况变化。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Nov;21(11):1144-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00576.x. Epub 2006 Jul 19.