Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jun 25;13:232. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-232.
While Switzerland invests a lot of money in its healthcare system, little is known about the quality of care delivered. The objective of this study was to assess the quality of care provided to patients with diabetes in the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland.
Cross-sectional study of 406 non-institutionalized adults with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Patients' characteristics, diabetes and process of care indicators were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. Process indicators (past 12 months) included HbA1C check among HbA1C-aware patients, eye assessment by ophtalmologist, microalbuminuria check, feet examination, lipid test, blood pressure and weight measurement, influenza immunization, physical activity recommendations, and dietary recommendations. Item-by-item (each process of care indicator: percentage of patients having received it), composite (mean percentage of recommended care: sum of received processes of care / sum of possible recommended care), and all-or-none (percentage of patients receiving all specified recommended care) measures were computed.
Mean age was 64.4 years; 59% were men. Type 1 and type 2 diabetes were reported by 18.2% and 68.5% of patients, respectively, but diabetes type remained undetermined for almost 20% of patients. Patients were treated with oral anti-diabetic drugs (50%), insulin (23%) or both (27%). Of 219 HbA1C-aware patients, 98% reported ≥ one HbA1C check during the last year. Also, ≥94% reported ≥ one blood pressure measurement, ≥ one weight measurement or lipid test, and 68%, 64% and 56% had feet examination, microalbuminuria check and eye assessment, respectively. Influenza immunization was reported by 62% of the patients.The percentage of patients receiving all processes of care ranged between 14.2%-16.9%, and 46.6%-50.7%, when considering ten and four indicators, respectively. Ambulatory care utilization showed little use of multidisciplinary care, and low levels of participation in diabetes-education classes.
While routine processes-of-care were performed annually in most patients, diabetes-specific risk screenings, influenza immunization, physical activity and dietary recommendations were less often reported; this was also the case for multidisciplinary care and participation in education classes. There is room for diabetes care improvement in Switzerland. These results should help define priorities and further develop country-specific chronic disease management initiatives for diabetes.
尽管瑞士在医疗保健系统上投入了大量资金,但对于所提供的医疗服务质量却知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估瑞士沃州糖尿病患者的医疗服务质量。
对 406 名非住院的 1 型或 2 型糖尿病成人患者进行横断面研究。使用自填式问卷收集患者特征、糖尿病和治疗过程指标。过程指标(过去 12 个月)包括知晓糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)的患者进行 HbA1C 检查、眼科医生进行眼部评估、微量白蛋白尿检查、足部检查、血脂检查、血压和体重测量、流感免疫接种、体力活动建议和饮食建议。逐项(每项治疗过程指标:接受该治疗过程的患者百分比)、综合(推荐治疗的平均百分比:接受的治疗过程数/可能推荐的治疗过程数)和全有或全无(接受所有指定推荐治疗的患者百分比)措施进行计算。
平均年龄为 64.4 岁;59%为男性。18.2%的患者报告患有 1 型糖尿病,68.5%的患者报告患有 2 型糖尿病,但近 20%的患者糖尿病类型尚未确定。患者接受口服抗糖尿病药物(50%)、胰岛素(23%)或两者(27%)治疗。在 219 名知晓糖化血红蛋白的患者中,98%的患者报告在过去一年中进行了≥一次 HbA1C 检查。此外,≥94%的患者报告进行了≥一次血压测量、≥一次体重测量或血脂检查,68%、64%和 56%的患者分别进行了足部检查、微量白蛋白尿检查和眼部评估。62%的患者报告进行了流感免疫接种。当考虑 10 项和 4 项指标时,接受所有治疗过程的患者百分比分别为 14.2%-16.9%和 46.6%-50.7%。门诊护理利用率显示出多学科护理利用不足,以及参与糖尿病教育课程的程度较低。
虽然大多数患者每年都进行常规的治疗过程,但糖尿病特异性风险筛查、流感免疫接种、体力活动和饮食建议的报告较少;多学科护理和参与教育课程的情况也是如此。瑞士的糖尿病治疗仍有改进的空间。这些结果应有助于确定优先事项,并进一步制定针对糖尿病的特定国家慢性病管理计划。