• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
National cost of trauma care by payer status.按支付方划分的创伤护理国家成本。
J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.068. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
2
Predicting inpatient hospital payments in the United States: a retrospective analysis.预测美国住院医院费用:一项回顾性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 10;15:372. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1040-8.
3
Insurance and inpatient care: differences in length of stay and costs between surgically treated cancer patients.保险与住院治疗:手术治疗癌症患者的住院时间和费用差异。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 15;118(20):5084-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27508. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Which Clinical and Patient Factors Influence the National Economic Burden of Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty?哪些临床和患者因素会影响全关节置换术后再入院的国家经济负担?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Dec;475(12):2926-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5244-6.
5
Association between insurance status and patient safety in the lumbar spine fusion population.保险状况与腰椎融合患者的患者安全之间的关联。
Spine J. 2017 Mar;17(3):338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
6
Insurance status is a potent predictor of outcomes in both blunt and penetrating trauma.保险状况是钝性和穿透性创伤结局的一个有力预测因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Apr;199(4):554-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.11.005.
7
Medicaid insurance as primary payer predicts increased mortality after total hip replacement in the state inpatient databases of California, Florida and New York.在加利福尼亚、佛罗里达和纽约的州住院患者数据库中,医疗补助保险作为主要支付方可预测全髋关节置换术后的死亡率增加。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Dec;43:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
8
Primary payer status affects outcomes for cardiac valve operations.主要付款人身份影响心脏瓣膜手术的结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 May;212(5):759-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.050. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
9
Estimates of charges associated with emergency department and hospital inpatient care for opioid abuse-related events.与阿片类药物滥用相关事件的急诊科和医院住院护理费用估计。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2013 Aug;27(3):206-13. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2013.803511. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
10
Burden of illness in patients with possible Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A retrospective claims-based study.疑似Lennox-Gastaut综合征患者的疾病负担:一项基于索赔数据的回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.08.032. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the Oklahoma predictor model for discharge destination in patients with major traumatic injury: a cross-sectional study.俄克拉荷马州重大创伤患者出院目的地预测模型的验证:一项横断面研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jul 21;51(1):256. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02925-4.
2
Damage control resuscitation: how it's done and where we can improve. A view of the Brazilian reality according to trauma professionals.损伤控制复苏:操作方法及改进方向。巴西创伤专业人士眼中的巴西现状。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2025 Jan 13;51:e20243785. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243785-en. eCollection 2025.
3
Dynamic three-dimensional coculture model: The future of tissue engineering applied to the peripheral nervous system.动态三维共培养模型:应用于周围神经系统的组织工程的未来。
J Tissue Eng. 2024 Aug 13;15:20417314241265916. doi: 10.1177/20417314241265916. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Insurance Type and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Critically Injured Trauma Patients.保险类型与创伤危重症患者生命支持治疗的撤停
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421711. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21711.
5
Barriers and facilitators associated with the upscaling of the Transmural Trauma Care Model: a qualitative study.与 Transmural Trauma Care Model 扩大规模相关的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10643-7.
6
The association between lactate to albumin ratio and outcomes at early phase in patients with traumatic brain injury.乳酸与白蛋白比值与创伤性脑损伤患者早期结局的关系。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Jul;29(7):752-757. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.40033.
7
Using medicare claims to estimate risk-adjusted performance of Pennsylvania trauma centers.利用医疗保险理赔数据评估宾夕法尼亚州创伤中心的风险调整后绩效。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jun 2;2(6):e0000263. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000263. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Association between pre-hospital National Early Warning Score and in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury.院前国家早期预警评分与创伤性脑损伤患者院内死亡率的相关性。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023 Mar;29(3):292-296. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.96809.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Transmural Trauma Care Model investigated in a multicenter trial with a controlled before-and-after design: A study protocol.多中心对照前后研究设计的创伤护理模式的有效性和成本效益研究:研究方案。
Physiother Res Int. 2021 Apr;26(2):e1894. doi: 10.1002/pri.1894. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Geospatial characteristics of non-motor vehicle and assault-related trauma events in greater Phoenix, Arizona.亚利桑那州大凤凰城地区非机动车与袭击相关创伤事件的地理空间特征。
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 15;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00258-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.291 种疾病和伤害导致的伤残调整生命年(DALYs)在 21 个地区,1990-2010 年:全球疾病负担研究 2010 的系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2197-223. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4.
2
A promise to save 100,000 trauma patients.拯救10万名创伤患者的承诺。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2062-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62037-6.
3
Regional variations in cost of trauma care in the United States: who is paying more?美国创伤护理费用的地区差异:谁支付的更多?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Aug;73(2):516-22. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e31825132a0.
4
One-year treatment costs of trauma care in the USA.美国创伤护理一年的治疗费用。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Apr;10(2):187-97. doi: 10.1586/erp.10.8.
5
How much uncompensated care do doctors provide?医生提供了多少无偿医疗服务?
J Health Econ. 2007 Dec 1;26(6):1151-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
6
Incidence and lifetime costs of injuries in the United States.美国伤害的发病率和终生成本。
Inj Prev. 2006 Aug;12(4):212-8. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.010983.
7
A growing hole in the safety net: physician charity care declines again.安全网中日益扩大的漏洞:医生慈善医疗再次减少。
Track Rep. 2006 Mar(13):1-4.
8
Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.用于在ICD-9-CM和ICD-10管理数据中定义合并症的编码算法。
Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000182534.19832.83.
9
Can hospitals and physicians shift the effects of cuts in Medicare reimbursement to private payers?医院和医生能否将医疗保险报销削减的影响转嫁给私人支付方?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Dec;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3-472-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w3.472.
10
Validity of information on comorbidity derived rom ICD-9-CCM administrative data.源自ICD - 9 - CCM管理数据的共病信息的有效性。
Med Care. 2002 Aug;40(8):675-85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200208000-00007.

按支付方划分的创伤护理国家成本。

National cost of trauma care by payer status.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Trials and Outcomes Research, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2013 Sep;184(1):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.068. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.068
PMID:23800441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5995319/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have described the burden of trauma care, but few have explored the economic burden of trauma inpatient costs from a payer's perspective or highlighted the differences in the average costs per person by payer status. The present study provides a conservative inpatient national trauma cost estimate and describes the variation in average inpatient trauma cost by payer status.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who had received trauma care at hospitals in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005-2010 was conducted. Our sample patients were selected using the appropriate "International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification" codes to identify admissions due to traumatic injury. The data were weighted to provide national population estimates, and all cost and charges were converted to 2010 US dollar equivalents. Generalized linear models were used to describe the costs by payer status, adjusting for patient characteristics, such as age, gender, and race, and hospital characteristics, such as location, teaching status, and patient case mix.

RESULTS

A total of 2,542,551 patients were eligible for the present study, with the payer status as follows: 672,960 patients (26.47%) with private insurance, 1,244,817 (48.96%) with Medicare, 262,256 (10.31%) with Medicaid, 195,056 (7.67%) with self-pay, 18,506 (0.73%) with no charge, and 150,956 (5.94%) with other types of insurance. The estimated yearly trauma inpatient cost burden was highest for Medicare at $17,551,393,082 (46.79%), followed by private insurance ($10,772,025,421 [28.72%]), Medicaid ($3,711,686,012 [9.89%], self-pay ($2,831,438,460 [7.55%]), and other payer types ($2,370,187,494 [6.32%]. The estimated yearly trauma inpatient cost burden was $274,598,190 (0.73%) for patients who were not charged for their inpatient trauma treatment. Our adjusted national inpatient trauma yearly costs were estimated at $37,511,328,659 US dollars. Privately insured patients had a significantly higher mean cost per person than did the Medicare, Medicaid, self-pay, or no charge patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study have demonstrated that the distribution of trauma burden across payers is significantly different from that of the overall healthcare system and suggest that although the burden of trauma is high, the burden of self-pay or nonreimbursed inpatient services is actually lower than that of overall medical care.

摘要

背景

已有多项研究描述了创伤护理的负担,但很少有研究从支付方的角度探讨创伤住院费用的经济负担,也很少有研究强调按支付方身份划分的人均平均住院创伤费用的差异。本研究提供了一个保守的全国创伤住院费用估计,并描述了按支付方身份划分的平均创伤住院费用的变化。

方法

对 2005-2010 年全国住院患者样本(NIS)中接受创伤护理的患者进行回顾性分析。我们的样本患者使用适当的“国际疾病分类,第九修订版,临床修正”代码选择,以确定因创伤性损伤而入院的患者。数据经过加权处理,以提供全国人口估计值,所有费用和收费均转换为 2010 年美元等值。使用广义线性模型按支付方身份描述费用,同时调整患者特征(如年龄、性别和种族)和医院特征(如位置、教学状态和患者病例组合)。

结果

共有 2542551 名患者符合本研究条件,支付方身份如下:私人保险患者 672960 人(26.47%),医疗保险患者 1244817 人(48.96%),医疗补助患者 262256 人(10.31%),自付患者 195056 人(7.67%),无费用患者 18506 人(0.73%),其他类型保险患者 150956 人(5.94%)。医疗保险的年创伤住院费用负担最高,为 17551393082 美元(46.79%),其次是私人保险(10772025421 美元[28.72%]),医疗补助(3711686012 美元[9.89%]),自付(2831438460 美元[7.55%])和其他支付类型(2370187494 美元[6.32%])。未对其创伤住院治疗收取费用的患者的年创伤住院费用负担估计为 274598190 美元(0.73%)。私人保险患者的人均费用明显高于医疗保险、医疗补助、自付或无费用患者。

结论

本研究结果表明,创伤负担在支付方之间的分布与整个医疗保健系统显著不同,这表明尽管创伤负担很高,但自付或未报销的住院服务负担实际上低于整体医疗保健负担。