van Rijsbergen Marielle W A, Mark Ruth E, de Kort Paul L M, Sitskoorn Margriet M
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Mar;23(3):408-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
Most studies to date have assessed poststroke cognitive impairment objectively, whereas less attention is paid to subjective cognitive complaints (SCC). We, therefore, systematically searched the literature to summarize and evaluate the current knowledge about poststroke SCC.
Articles were included in this review if the study evaluated SCC in adult stroke survivors, and the publication was an original empirical article from which the full text was available. There were no year or language restrictions.
Twenty-six studies were found on poststroke SCC. There is a huge heterogeneity among these studies with respect to stroke sample, SCC definitions, and instruments used, but they all showed that SCC are very common after stroke. Other main findings are that SCC tend to increase over time and that there is moderate agreement between patients and their proxies on prevalence and severity of patients' SCC. Furthermore, SCC are inconsistently associated with current depressive symptoms and objective cognitive performances, whereas they may predict future emotional and cognitive functioning.
This review highlights that poststroke SCC are highly prevalent and that clinicians should take such complaints seriously. More research is, however, needed to gain further insight into poststroke SCC, to be able to accurately inform patients and relatives, and to develop adequate treatment programs. Based on the limitations of the studies to date, suggestions are made on how both future research and ultimately patient-centered care may be improved in stroke survivors.
迄今为止,大多数研究都客观地评估了中风后认知障碍,而对主观认知主诉(SCC)的关注较少。因此,我们系统地检索了文献,以总结和评估目前关于中风后SCC的知识。
如果研究评估了成年中风幸存者的SCC,且该出版物是一篇可获取全文的原创实证文章,则将其纳入本综述。没有年份或语言限制。
共发现26项关于中风后SCC的研究。这些研究在中风样本、SCC定义和使用的工具方面存在巨大异质性,但它们都表明SCC在中风后非常常见。其他主要发现是,SCC往往会随着时间的推移而增加,并且患者与其代理人在患者SCC的患病率和严重程度上存在中度一致性。此外,SCC与当前抑郁症状和客观认知表现之间的关联并不一致,而它们可能预测未来的情绪和认知功能。
本综述强调中风后SCC非常普遍,临床医生应认真对待此类主诉。然而,需要更多的研究来进一步了解中风后SCC,以便能够准确地告知患者及其亲属,并制定适当的治疗方案。基于迄今为止研究的局限性,针对如何改善中风幸存者未来的研究以及最终以患者为中心的护理提出了建议。