• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理农场和日间护理中心的心理健康康复:基于用户视角的定性比较研究

Mental health recovery on care farms and day centres: a qualitative comparative study of users' perspectives.

作者信息

Iancu Sorana C, Zweekhorst Marjolein B M, Veltman Dick J, van Balkom Anton J L M, Bunders Joske F G

机构信息

Department of Innovation in the Health and Life Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(7):573-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.804595. Epub 2013 Jun 26.

DOI:10.3109/09638288.2013.804595
PMID:23802137
Abstract

PURPOSE

Mental health services increasingly incorporate the vision of recovery. This qualitative study analysed and compared experiences of recovery on prevocational services, in order to assess if users make progress towards recovery, relative to a staged recovery model.

METHOD

Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with participants on care farms (n = 14), work (n = 7) and creative projects (n = 5).

RESULTS

The transition from past to current lives was described as a progressive, non-linear process, with different stages guided by different goals. Participants on creative projects lacked clear goals, presented less interest in peers and high need for emotional support. Participants on work projects aimed for occupational rehabilitation, but struggled with the patient culture of the peer community. Participants on care farms aimed for daytime occupations and closer contact with society. They experienced care farms as open, real-life work settings where they could exercise responsibility and connect with people.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants progressed towards recovery, as care farms, work- and creative projects empowered them to leave behind inactive, isolated or disorganized living. In day centres, users focused on self-reflection and personal development (creative projects) or on occupational performance (work projects), whereas on care farms, users fulfilled worker roles in a real-life, open community environment.

IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION

Organized as open communities in real-life settings, care farms facilitate the reflection on personal and social responsibility, and therefore have the potential to help users internalize worker identities and improve their motivation to progress towards recovery. Supervisors on care farms are regarded by users as close contacts within the social networks they develop on the service, a position that allows supervisors to actively engage and promote users' progress towards recovery. Elements of the farm environment (such as the "normal life", presence of family members and visitors, and nature) can serve as anchors for supporting the progress towards recovery.

摘要

目的

心理健康服务越来越多地融入康复理念。这项定性研究分析并比较了职业前服务中的康复体验,以评估相对于阶段性康复模型,使用者在康复方面是否取得进展。

方法

通过对参与护理农场项目(n = 14)、工作项目(n = 7)和创意项目(n = 5)的参与者进行半结构化访谈收集数据。

结果

从过去生活到当前生活的转变被描述为一个渐进的、非线性的过程,不同阶段由不同目标引导。参与创意项目的参与者缺乏明确目标,对同伴的兴趣较低,对情感支持的需求较高。参与工作项目的参与者旨在实现职业康复,但在同伴社区的患者文化中挣扎。参与护理农场项目的参与者旨在从事日间职业并与社会有更密切的接触。他们将护理农场体验为开放的、现实生活中的工作场所,在那里他们可以承担责任并与人建立联系。

结论

参与者在康复方面取得了进展,因为护理农场、工作和创意项目使他们能够摆脱无所事事、孤立或杂乱无章的生活。在日间中心,使用者专注于自我反思和个人发展(创意项目)或职业表现(工作项目),而在护理农场,使用者在现实生活的开放社区环境中扮演工人角色。

对康复的启示

护理农场作为现实生活环境中的开放社区进行组织,有助于反思个人和社会责任,因此有可能帮助使用者内化工人身份并提高他们朝着康复前进的动力。护理农场的主管被使用者视为他们在服务中建立的社交网络中的密切联系人,这一地位使主管能够积极参与并促进使用者朝着康复前进。农场环境的元素(如“正常生活”、家庭成员和访客的存在以及自然)可以作为支持康复进展的支柱。

相似文献

1
Mental health recovery on care farms and day centres: a qualitative comparative study of users' perspectives.护理农场和日间护理中心的心理健康康复:基于用户视角的定性比较研究
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(7):573-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.804595. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
2
Understanding how prevocational training on care farms can lead to functioning, motivation and well-being.了解护理农场的职业前培训如何能促进功能、动力和幸福感。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Dec;38(25):2504-13. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1130177. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Supporting workers with mental health problems to retain employment: users' experiences of a UK job retention project.支持有心理健康问题的员工继续工作:英国一项工作保留项目中用户的经历。
Work. 2012;42(4):461-71. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1370.
4
How the all fruits salad creates sweeter futures in rural and remote mental health.全水果沙拉如何为农村和偏远地区的心理健康创造更美好的未来。
Australas Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;17 Suppl 1:S142-5. doi: 10.1080/10398560902948464.
5
Implementing the National Service Framework for Long-Term (Neurological) Conditions: service user and service provider experiences.实施国家长期(神经科)病症服务框架:服务使用者与服务提供者的经验
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(7):563-72. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.804594. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
6
Outsourcing mental health care services? The practice and potential of community-based farms in psychiatric rehabilitation.
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Feb;51(2):175-84. doi: 10.1007/s10597-014-9742-7. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
7
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
8
Consideration of the influence of place on access to employment for persons with serious mental illness in northeastern Ontario.安大略省东北部地区对严重精神疾病患者就业机会获取的影响因素考量。
Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:2034. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Work activity in the process of recovery - an interpretive phenomenological analysis of the experiences of people with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis.康复过程中的工作活动——对精神分裂症谱系诊断患者经历的解释现象学分析
Psychiatr Pol. 2016;50(4):805-826. doi: 10.12740/PP/44238.
10
[Occupational rehabilitation of psychiatric patients--results of a study of workshops for handicapped patients].[精神病患者的职业康复——针对残疾患者的工作坊研究结果]
Psychiatr Prax. 1992 Nov;19(6):201-6.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of an agro-healing program on family resilience, parental stress, and social skills of children with developmental disabilities.一项农业治疗项目对发育障碍儿童的家庭恢复力、父母压力及社交技能的影响。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 30;11(4):e42389. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42389. eCollection 2025 Feb 28.
2
GAIA therapeutic farm: Prospective study on multidisciplinary care efficacy.盖亚治疗农场:多学科护理疗效的前瞻性研究。
Tunis Med. 2024 Oct 5;102(10):622-627. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.4959.
3
Psychological, psychosocial and physical barriers preventing nature-based intervention participation in adults with mental health disorders: A scoping review.
阻碍患有精神健康障碍的成年人参与基于自然的干预措施的心理、社会心理和身体障碍:一项范围综述。
J Health Psychol. 2024 Oct 10;30(8):13591053241270410. doi: 10.1177/13591053241270410.
4
The impact of care farms on quality of life, depression and anxiety among different population groups: A systematic review.关怀农场对不同人群生活质量、抑郁和焦虑的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 26;15(4):e1061. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1061. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Animal Assisted Interventions in the Green Care Framework: A Literature Review.动物辅助干预在绿色关怀框架中的应用:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 7;18(18):9431. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189431.
6
An Integrative Review of Recovery Services to Improve the Lives of Adults Living with Severe Mental Illness.综合康复服务对改善严重精神疾病患者生活的研究综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 23;18(16):8873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168873.
7
What are the barriers to, and enablers of, working with people with lived experience of mental illness amongst community and voluntary sector organisations? A qualitative study.在社区和志愿组织中,与有精神疾病经历的人合作存在哪些障碍和促进因素?一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235334. eCollection 2020.
8
Evaluating care farming as a means to care for those in trauma and grief.评估关怀农业作为一种关怀创伤和悲伤者的方式。
Health Place. 2020 Mar;62:102281. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102281. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
What's in it for the animals? Symbiotically considering 'therapeutic' human-animal relations within spaces and practices of care farming.这对动物有什么好处?从共生关系角度审视关怀农场空间与实践中的“治疗性”人兽关系。
Med Humanit. 2019 Sep;45(3):313-325. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2018-011627. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
10
The challenges of living with bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of the implications for health care and research.双相情感障碍患者的生活挑战:一项关于对医疗保健和研究影响的定性研究
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2018 Nov 6;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40345-018-0131-y.