• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

训练严重创伤性脑损伤患者的交流伙伴可改善日常会话:一项多中心单盲临床试验。

Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial.

机构信息

Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):637-45. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1173.

DOI:10.2340/16501977-1173
PMID:23803687
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine effectiveness of communication training for partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Three arm non-randomized controlled trial comparing communication partner training (JOINT) with individual treatment (TBI SOLO) and a waitlist control group with 6 month follow-up.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-four outpatients with severe chronic traumatic brain injuries were recruited.

INTERVENTION

Ten-week conversational skills treatment program encompassing weekly group and individual sessions for both treatment groups. The JOINT condition focused on both the partner and the person with traumatic brain injury while the TBI SOLO condition focused on the individual with TBI only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcomes were blind ratings of the person with traumatic brain injury's level of participation during conversation on the Measure of Participation in Communication Adapted Kagan scales.

RESULTS

Communication partner training improved conversational performance relative to training the person with traumatic brain injury alone and a waitlist control group on the primary outcome measures. Results were maintained at six months post-training.

CONCLUSION

Training communication partners of people with chronic severe traumatic brain injury was more efficacious than training the person with traumatic brain injury alone. The Adapted Kagan scales proved to be a robust and sensitive outcome measure for a conversational skills training program.

摘要

目的

确定针对严重创伤性脑损伤患者的伴侣进行沟通培训的效果。

设计

比较沟通伙伴培训(JOINT)与个体治疗(TBI SOLO)和 6 个月随访的等待名单对照组的三臂非随机对照试验。

参与者

招募了 44 名患有严重慢性创伤性脑损伤的门诊患者。

干预措施

为期 10 周的会话技能治疗计划,包括每周一次的小组和个人会议,适用于两个治疗组。JOINT 条件不仅关注伴侣,还关注创伤性脑损伤患者,而 TBI SOLO 条件仅关注创伤性脑损伤患者个人。

主要结果测量

主要结果是通过 Kagan 适应沟通参与量表对创伤性脑损伤患者在对话中的参与程度进行盲评。

结果

与单独培训创伤性脑损伤患者和等待名单对照组相比,沟通伙伴培训在主要结果测量方面提高了会话表现。结果在训练后 6 个月仍得以维持。

结论

对慢性严重创伤性脑损伤患者的沟通伙伴进行培训比单独培训创伤性脑损伤患者更有效。适应 Kagan 量表被证明是一种用于会话技能培训计划的强大而敏感的结果测量方法。

相似文献

1
Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: a multicenter single blind clinical trial.训练严重创伤性脑损伤患者的交流伙伴可改善日常会话:一项多中心单盲临床试验。
J Rehabil Med. 2013 Jul;45(7):637-45. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1173.
2
The effectiveness of social communication partner training for adults with severe chronic TBI and their families using a measure of perceived communication ability.使用感知沟通能力量表对患有严重慢性创伤性脑损伤的成年人及其家庭进行社交沟通伙伴培训的效果。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Mar 23;38(3):243-55. doi: 10.3233/NRE-151316.
3
Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis.描述创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者与沟通伙伴在接受沟通伙伴培训后的对话:运用交流结构分析
Brain Inj. 2013 Jun;27(6):717-42. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.775485.
4
Improved Conversation Outcomes After Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Communication Partners: A Clinical Trial Investigating In-Person and Telehealth Delivery.创伤性脑损伤患者及其沟通伙伴接受社交沟通技能训练后的对话效果改善:一项针对面对面和远程医疗的临床试验研究。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):615-632. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00076. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury.评估针对创伤性脑损伤患者付费护理人员的沟通培训。
Brain Inj. 2012;26(13-14):1702-15. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2012.722258.
6
An exploration of participant experience of a communication training program for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners.创伤性脑损伤患者及其沟通伙伴的沟通培训计划的参与者体验探索。
Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(18):1562-74. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.656788. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
7
Conversational topics discussed by individuals with severe traumatic brain injury and their communication partners during sub-acute recovery.重度创伤性脑损伤患者及其交流伙伴在亚急性康复期间讨论的话题。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(11):1329-1342. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1187288. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
Social skills treatment for people with severe, chronic acquired brain injuries: a multicenter trial.针对重度慢性获得性脑损伤患者的社交技能治疗:一项多中心试验。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1648-59. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.029.
9
Conversational synchrony in the communicative interactions of individuals with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者交流互动中的对话同步性。
Brain Inj. 2015;29(11):1300-8. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1042408. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
10
Patterns of early conversational recovery for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners.创伤性脑损伤患者及其交流伙伴的早期对话恢复模式。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):690-698. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1571632. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication training program for nurses caring for patients with aphasia: a quasi-experimental study.针对失语症患者护理护士的沟通培训项目:一项准实验研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):893. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02599-0.
2
Digital Health Implementation Strategies Coproduced With Adults With Acquired Brain Injury, Their Close Others, and Clinicians: Mixed Methods Study With Collaborative Autoethnography and Network Analysis.与成人获得性脑损伤患者、他们的亲近者和临床医生共同制定的数字健康实施策略:混合方法研究结合协作自传和网络分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 19;25:e46396. doi: 10.2196/46396.
3
Developing a Digital Health Intervention for Conversation Skills After Brain Injury (convers-ABI-lity) Using a Collaborative Approach: Mixed Methods Study.
采用协作方法为脑损伤后会话技能开发数字健康干预(convers-ABI-lity):混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 9;25:e45240. doi: 10.2196/45240.
4
A Descriptive Analysis of Access to Assistive Technology in Children With Acquired Brain Injury: The Right to Assistive Devices.获得性脑损伤儿童获得辅助技术的情况描述性分析:辅助器具的权利。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2024;39(2):152-159. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000876. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
5
Training Resources Targeting Social Media Skills to Inform Rehabilitation for People Who Have an Acquired Brain Injury: Scoping Review.针对社交媒体技能的培训资源,以告知患有后天性脑损伤的人进行康复:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 28;24(4):e35595. doi: 10.2196/35595.
6
Systematic Review of Discourse and Social Communication Interventions in Traumatic Brain Injury.系统评价创伤性脑损伤的话语和社会交流干预措施。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Mar 10;31(2):991-1022. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00088. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
7
Examining the Efficacy of Communication Partner Training for Improving Communication Interactions and Outcomes for Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.评估沟通伙伴培训对改善创伤性脑损伤患者沟通互动及结果的效果:一项系统综述。
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2019 Dec 21;2(1):100036. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100036. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
The Experience of Caregivers Following a Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Requiring ICU Admission.中重度创伤性脑损伤患者 ICU 治疗后照护者的体验。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):E299-E309. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000525.
9
Patterns of early conversational recovery for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners.创伤性脑损伤患者及其交流伙伴的早期对话恢复模式。
Brain Inj. 2019;33(5):690-698. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1571632. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
10
Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: exploring the first year.重度创伤性脑损伤后的言语恢复:第一年的探索
Brain Inj. 2019;33(2):143-159. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1539246. Epub 2018 Nov 22.