Suppr超能文献

社会调节决策:跨物种综述。

Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review.

机构信息

Department of Organismal Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 26;7:301. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Taking decisions plays a pivotal role in daily life and comprises a complex process of assessing and weighing short-term and long-term costs and benefits of competing actions. Decision-making has been shown to be affected by factors such as sex, age, genotype, and personality. Importantly, also the social environment affects decisions, both via social interactions (e.g., social learning, cooperation and competition) and social stress effects. Although everyone is aware of this social modulating role on daily life decisions, this has thus far only scarcely been investigated in human and animal studies. Furthermore, neuroscientific studies rarely discuss social influence on decision-making from a functional perspective such as done in behavioral ecology studies. Therefore, the first aim of this article is to review the available data of the influence of the social context on decision-making both from a causal and functional perspective, drawing on animal and human studies. Also, there is currently still a gap between decision-making in real life where influences of the social environment are extensive, and decision-making as measured in the laboratory, which is often done without any (deliberate) social influences. However, methods are being developed to bridge this gap. Therefore, the second aim of this review is to discuss these methods and ways in which this gap can be increasingly narrowed. We end this review by formulating future research questions.

摘要

做决策在日常生活中起着关键作用,它包括一个评估和权衡短期和长期竞争行为的成本和收益的复杂过程。研究表明,决策受到性别、年龄、基因型和个性等因素的影响。重要的是,社会环境也会通过社交互动(例如社交学习、合作与竞争)和社会压力效应对决策产生影响。尽管每个人都意识到社会环境对日常生活决策有调节作用,但到目前为止,人类和动物研究中对这方面的研究还很少。此外,神经科学研究很少从行为生态学研究那样的功能角度来讨论社会对决策的影响。因此,本文的第一个目的是从因果关系和功能关系两个方面综述社会环境对决策的影响的现有数据,借鉴动物和人类的研究。此外,现实生活中的决策受到社会环境的广泛影响,而实验室中的决策往往没有(故意)受到社会影响,这两者之间目前仍然存在差距。但是,已经开发出了一些方法来缩小这一差距。因此,本文的第二个目的是讨论这些方法以及如何越来越缩小这一差距。最后,我们提出了未来的研究问题。

相似文献

1
Social modulation of decision-making: a cross-species review.社会调节决策:跨物种综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 26;7:301. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00301. eCollection 2013.
4
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.饮食糖化化合物 - 对人类健康的影响。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Sep;54(8):485-617. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985. Epub 2024 Aug 16.

引用本文的文献

6
Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences.群体选择似乎与个人偏好不一致。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Jul 19;4(7):170232. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170232. eCollection 2017 Jul.

本文引用的文献

6
Time-dependent changes in altruistic punishment following stress.应激后利他惩罚的时变变化。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Sep;38(9):1467-75. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.12.012. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
10
Hormonal contraception use alters stress responses and emotional memory.激素避孕会改变应激反应和情绪记忆。
Biol Psychol. 2013 Feb;92(2):257-66. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验