Aparicio V A, Sánchez C, Ortega F B, Nebot E, Kapravelou G, Porres J M, Aranda P
Department of Medical Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Nutr Hosp. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):127-36. doi: 10.3305/nh.2013.28.1.6055.
Dietary protein amount and source, hypertrophy resistance training (RT) and anabolicandrogenic steroids (AAS) may affect body weight and plasma and hepatic lipid profile.
157 adult male Wistar rats were randomly distributed in 16 experimental groups resulting in: normal-protein (NP) or high-protein (HP) diets, whey or soy-protein diets, with or without RT and with or without AAS, for 3 months.
Final body weight was lower in the RT and AAS groups compared to sedentary and non- AAS groups, respectively (all, p<0.001). Plasma total cholesterol (TC) was lower for the HP compared to the NP diets, for the whey compared to the soy-protein diets and for the AAS compared to the non-AAS groups (all, p<0.001). Plasma HDL-cholesterol was higher in the RT groups (p<0.05) but lower for the AAS groups (p<0.001), the HP and the soy-protein diets (p<0.05). Plasma triglycerides (TAG) were lower for the HP diet (p<0.001), for the RT (p=0.002) and the non-AAS groups (p=0.001). Liver TC was lower for the NP (p<0.01), for the soyprotein (p<0.05) and for the AAS groups (p<0.001). Liver TAG were lower for the whey-protein diet (p<0.001), RT and non-AAS groups (both, p<0.05). Some interactions were found, such as the greater effect of AAS on reducing body weight of rats that performed RT or ingested a HP diet (all, p<0.05). HDL-cholesterol was higher when RT was combined with HP diets (p=0.010) or non-AAS and when HP diets were combined with non-AAS (both,p<0.001). Groups that combined RT with non-AAS administration obtained the lowest hepatic TAG (p<0.05).
Among all the interventions tested, AAS was the factor that most negatively affected plasma and hepatic lipid profile, whereas HP diets and RT could benefit lipid profile, especially when combined.
膳食蛋白质的量和来源、抗阻训练(RT)以及合成代谢雄激素类固醇(AAS)可能会影响体重、血浆和肝脏脂质谱。
157只成年雄性Wistar大鼠被随机分为16个实验组,形成以下组合:正常蛋白质(NP)或高蛋白(HP)饮食、乳清蛋白或大豆蛋白饮食,有或无抗阻训练以及有或无合成代谢雄激素类固醇,为期3个月。
与久坐不动组和非AAS组相比,RT组和AAS组的最终体重分别更低(均p<0.001)。与NP饮食相比,HP饮食组的血浆总胆固醇(TC)更低;与大豆蛋白饮食相比,乳清蛋白饮食组的更低;与非AAS组相比,AAS组的更低(均p<0.001)。RT组的血浆高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL - C)更高(p<0.05),但AAS组、HP饮食组和大豆蛋白饮食组更低(p<0.05)。HP饮食组(p<0.001)、RT组(p = 0.002)和非AAS组(p = 0.001)的血浆甘油三酯(TAG)更低。NP组(p<0.01)、大豆蛋白组(p<0.05)和AAS组(p<0.001)的肝脏TC更低。乳清蛋白饮食组(p<0.001)、RT组和非AAS组(均p<0.05)的肝脏TAG更低。发现了一些相互作用,例如AAS对进行抗阻训练或摄入HP饮食的大鼠体重减轻的影响更大(均p<0.05)。当RT与HP饮食联合时(p =
0.010)或与非AAS联合以及HP饮食与非AAS联合时,HDL - C更高(均p<0.001)。将RT与非AAS联合使用的组肝脏TAG最低(p<0.05)。
在所有测试的干预措施中:AAS是对血浆和肝脏脂质谱影响最负面的因素,而HP饮食和抗阻训练对脂质谱有益,尤其是联合使用时。