Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Social Medicine and the Center of Bioethics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;121(6):1305-1308. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318293f12f.
"Therapeutic" bed rest continues to be used widely, despite evidence of no benefit and known harms. In this commentary, we summarize the Cochrane reviews of bed rest and propose an ethical argument for discontinuing this practice. Cochrane systematic reviews do not support "therapeutic" bed rest for threatened abortion, hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm birth, multiple gestations, or impaired fetal growth. This assessment has been echoed in other comprehensive reviews. Prescribing bed rest is inconsistent with the ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Hence, if bed rest is to be used, it should be only within a formal clinical trial.
尽管有证据表明“治疗性”卧床休息没有益处且已知存在危害,但它仍被广泛使用。在这篇评论中,我们总结了 Cochrane 对卧床休息的综述,并提出了停止这种做法的伦理论点。Cochrane 系统评价不支持将“治疗性”卧床休息用于先兆流产、高血压、子痫前期、早产、多胎妊娠或胎儿生长受限。其他综合评价也对此进行了回应。开处卧床休息的医嘱不符合自主、善行和公正的伦理原则。因此,如果要使用卧床休息,应该只在正式的临床试验中使用。