University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Bone Joint J. 2013 Jul;95-B(7):874-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.26931.
In a time of limited resources, the debate continues over which types of hip prosthesis are clinically superior and more cost-effective. Orthopaedic surgeons increasingly need robust economic evidence to understand the full value of the operation, and to aid decision making on the 'package' of procedures that are available and to justify their practice beyond traditional clinical preference. In this paper we explore the current economic debate about the merits of cemented and cementless total hip replacement, an issue that continues to divide the orthopaedic community.
在资源有限的情况下,关于哪种类型的髋关节假体在临床上更优越、更具成本效益的争论仍在继续。骨科医生越来越需要强有力的经济证据来了解手术的全部价值,并帮助他们在现有的手术方案中做出决策,证明其做法除了传统的临床偏好之外还有其他价值。本文探讨了目前关于骨水泥固定和非骨水泥固定全髋关节置换术的优缺点的经济争论,这一问题继续使骨科界产生分歧。