• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cognitive Adaptations for -person Exchange: The Evolutionary Roots of Organizational Behavior.人际交换的认知适应:组织行为的进化根源
MDE Manage Decis Econ. 2006 Mar;27(2-3):103-129. doi: 10.1002/mde.1287.
2
The psychosemantics of free riding: dissecting the architecture of a moral concept.免费搭车的心理语义学:剖析一个道德概念的结构。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1252-70. doi: 10.1037/a0027026. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
3
Cooperation, Trust, and Antagonism: How Public Goods Are Promoted.合作、信任与对抗:公共物品如何得到促进。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Dec;14(3):119-65. doi: 10.1177/1529100612474436.
4
Group Cooperation without Group Selection: Modest Punishment Can Recruit Much Cooperation.无群体选择的群体合作:适度惩罚可促成更多合作。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 20;10(4):e0124561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124561. eCollection 2015.
5
The evolution of cooperation by negotiation in a noisy world.在嘈杂世界中通过协商实现合作的演变
J Evol Biol. 2017 Mar;30(3):603-615. doi: 10.1111/jeb.13030. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
6
Stable polymorphism of cooperators and punishers in a public goods game.公共物品博弈中合作者与惩罚者的稳定多态性
J Theor Biol. 2017 Apr 21;419:243-253. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.11.012. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
7
Evolutionary advantages of turning points in human cooperative behaviour.人类合作行为转折点的进化优势。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 9;16(2):e0246278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246278. eCollection 2021.
8
In Defense of the Commons: Young Children Negatively Evaluate and Sanction Free Riders.捍卫公共资源:幼儿会对搭便车者进行负面评价和制裁。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Oct;29(10):1598-1611. doi: 10.1177/0956797618779061. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
9
Rules of social exchange: game theory, individual differences and psychopathology.社会交换规则:博弈论、个体差异与精神病理学
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Mar;33(3):305-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.008. Epub 2008 Sep 27.
10
Low-carbon technology collaborative innovation in industrial cluster with social exclusion: An evolutionary game theory perspective.存在社会排斥情况下产业集群中的低碳技术协同创新:基于演化博弈论的视角
Chaos. 2021 Mar;31(3):033124. doi: 10.1063/5.0037956.

引用本文的文献

1
Infants expect some degree of positive and negative reciprocity between strangers.婴儿期望与陌生人之间存在一定程度的积极和消极互惠。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 4;15(1):7742. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51982-7.
2
Terrorism as Coalitional Predation: Explaining Definitional Ambiguities and Precautionary Responses.恐怖主义作为联合掠夺:解释定义上的模糊性和预防性反应。
Evol Psychol. 2024 Apr-Jun;22(2):14747049241263995. doi: 10.1177/14747049241263995.
3
Coalitions and conflict: A longitudinal analysis of men's politics.联盟与冲突:男性政治的纵向分析
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 May 5;3:e31. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.26. eCollection 2021.
4
Punishment: one tool, many uses.惩罚:一种工具,多种用途。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Nov 12;1:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.12. eCollection 2019.
5
Do Experimental Manipulations of Pathogen Avoidance Motivations Influence Conformity?实验性地操纵病原体回避动机是否会影响从众行为?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):1051-1065. doi: 10.1177/01461672231160655. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
6
The sense of belonging reduces ingroup favoritism in children.归属感会减少儿童的内群体偏好。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1;13:1059415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059415. eCollection 2022.
7
Distinguishing Intergroup and Long-Distance Relationships.区分群体内关系和远距离关系。
Hum Nat. 2022 Sep;33(3):280-303. doi: 10.1007/s12110-022-09431-1. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
8
Green Transformation of Anti-Epidemic Supplies in the Post-Pandemic Era: An Evolutionary Approach.后疫情时代防疫物资的绿色转型:一种进化方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 15;19(10):6011. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19106011.
9
Do conspiracy theories efficiently signal coalition membership? An experimental test using the "Who Said What?" design.阴谋论是否有效地传递了联盟成员身份的信号?使用“谁说了什么?”设计的实验测试。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0265211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265211. eCollection 2022.
10
How collective reward structure impedes group decision making: An experimental study using the HoneyComb paradigm.集体奖励结构如何阻碍群体决策:使用 HoneyComb 范式的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259963. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village.舒阿尔族村庄中的亲社区利他主义与社会地位
Hum Nat. 2003 Jun;14(2):191-5. doi: 10.1007/s12110-003-1003-3.
2
Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem.间接互惠可以在不存在二阶搭便车问题的情况下稳定合作。
Nature. 2004 Nov 25;432(7016):499-502. doi: 10.1038/nature02978.
3
The nature of human altruism.人类利他主义的本质。
Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):785-91. doi: 10.1038/nature02043.
4
The evolution of altruistic punishment.利他惩罚的演变
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3531-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630443100. Epub 2003 Mar 11.
5
Selective impairment of reasoning about social exchange in a patient with bilateral limbic system damage.双侧边缘系统损伤患者对社会交换推理的选择性损害。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11531-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.122352699. Epub 2002 Aug 12.
6
Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization.种族能够被消除吗?联合计算与社会分类。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Dec 18;98(26):15387-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251541498. Epub 2001 Dec 11.
7
The evolution of cooperation.合作的演变
Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390-6. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396.
8
Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility.紧急情况下的旁观者干预:责任分散。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 Apr;8(4):377-83. doi: 10.1037/h0025589.
9
Does the autistic child have a "theory of mind"?自闭症儿童有“心理理论”吗?
Cognition. 1985 Oct;21(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8.
10
The logic of social exchange: has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task.社会交换的逻辑:自然选择塑造了人类的推理方式吗?关于沃森选择任务的研究。
Cognition. 1989 Apr;31(3):187-276. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1.

人际交换的认知适应:组织行为的进化根源

Cognitive Adaptations for -person Exchange: The Evolutionary Roots of Organizational Behavior.

作者信息

Tooby John, Cosmides Leda, Price Michael E

机构信息

Center for Evolutionary Psychology, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3210, USA.

出版信息

MDE Manage Decis Econ. 2006 Mar;27(2-3):103-129. doi: 10.1002/mde.1287.

DOI:10.1002/mde.1287
PMID:23814325
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3693395/
Abstract

Organizations are composed of stable, predominantly cooperative interactions or -person exchanges. Humans have been engaging in -person exchanges for a great enough period of evolutionary time that we appear to have evolved a distinct constellation of species-typical mechanisms specialized to solve the adaptive problems posed by this form of social interaction. These mechanisms appear to have been evolutionarily elaborated out of the cognitive infrastructure that initially evolved for dyadic exchange. Key adaptive problems that these mechanisms are designed to solve include coordination among individuals, and defense against exploitation by free riders. Multi-individual cooperation could not have been maintained over evolutionary time if free riders reliably benefited more than contributors to collective enterprises, and so outcompeted them. As a result, humans evolved mechanisms that implement an aversion to exploitation by free riding, and a strategy of conditional cooperation, supplemented by punitive sentiment towards free riders. Because of the design of these mechanisms, how free riding is treated is a central determinant of the survival and health of cooperative organizations. The mapping of the evolved psychology of -party exchange cooperation may contribute to the construction of a principled theoretical foundation for the understanding of human behavior in organizations.

摘要

组织由稳定的、主要是合作性的互动或多人交换构成。人类进行多人交换的时间跨度在进化史上足够长,以至于我们似乎已经进化出了一组独特的物种典型机制,专门用于解决这种社会互动形式所带来的适应性问题。这些机制似乎是从最初为二元交换而进化出的认知基础结构中演化而来的。这些机制旨在解决的关键适应性问题包括个体之间的协调,以及抵御搭便车者的剥削。如果搭便车者总是比集体企业的贡献者受益更多,从而在竞争中胜过他们,那么多人合作在进化过程中就不可能持续下去。因此,人类进化出了一些机制,这些机制表现为对搭便车剥削的厌恶,以及一种有条件合作的策略,并辅之以对搭便车者的惩罚情绪。由于这些机制的设计,搭便车行为的处理方式是合作组织生存和健康的核心决定因素。对三方交换合作的进化心理学的研究,可能有助于构建一个有原则的理论基础,以理解组织中的人类行为。