• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验性地操纵病原体回避动机是否会影响从众行为?

Do Experimental Manipulations of Pathogen Avoidance Motivations Influence Conformity?

机构信息

Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

Aarhus University, Denmark.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):1051-1065. doi: 10.1177/01461672231160655. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1177/01461672231160655
PMID:36945750
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11143762/
Abstract

By conforming to ingroup norms, individuals coordinate with other group members, preserve cohesion, and avoid costs of exclusion. Previous experiments have shown that increased concerns about infectious disease increase conformity. However, coordination with other group members has multiple benefits, most of which exist independent of pathogenic infection. Hence, a strong causal effect of pathogen avoidance motivations on conformity seems unlikely. Results from five experiments ( = 1,931) showed only limited support for the hypothesis that experimentally increasing pathogen avoidance motivations influences conformity. Overall, our findings are not consistent with the notion that the human mind contains a fast-acting psychological mechanism that regulates conformity as a function of short-term pathogen avoidance motivations.

摘要

通过遵守群体规范,个体与其他群体成员协调一致,保持凝聚力,并避免被排斥的代价。先前的实验表明,对传染病的担忧增加会导致从众行为增加。然而,与其他群体成员的协调有多种好处,其中大多数与致病性感染无关。因此,病原体回避动机对从众行为的强烈因果影响似乎不太可能。五项实验的结果(n=1931)仅有限地支持了这样一种假设,即实验性地增加对病原体回避的动机会影响从众行为。总的来说,我们的发现与这样一种观点不一致,即人类的思维中包含一种快速作用的心理机制,根据短期的病原体回避动机来调节从众行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37a/11143762/3768f6e12150/10.1177_01461672231160655-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37a/11143762/3768f6e12150/10.1177_01461672231160655-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e37a/11143762/3768f6e12150/10.1177_01461672231160655-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Do Experimental Manipulations of Pathogen Avoidance Motivations Influence Conformity?实验性地操纵病原体回避动机是否会影响从众行为?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):1051-1065. doi: 10.1177/01461672231160655. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
On the origins of cultural differences in conformity: four tests of the pathogen prevalence hypothesis.文化遵从差异的起源:病原体流行假说的四项检验。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;37(3):318-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167210394451.
3
Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations.寄生虫压力和病原体规避与30个国家政治意识形态的不同维度相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12408-12413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607398113. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Sexual Disgust Trumps Pathogen Disgust in Predicting Voter Behavior During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.在预测2016年美国总统大选期间的选民行为方面,性厌恶比病原体厌恶更具影响力。
Evol Psychol. 2018 Apr-Jun;16(2):1474704918764170. doi: 10.1177/1474704918764170.
5
Brain Systems Underlying Fundamental Motivations of Human Social Conformity.人类社会从众行为的基本动机的大脑系统。
Neurosci Bull. 2023 Feb;39(2):328-342. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00960-4. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
6
Different drives of herding: An exploratory study of motivations underlying social conformity.不同的羊群驱动因素:对社会从众动机的探索性研究。
Psych J. 2022 Apr;11(2):247-258. doi: 10.1002/pchj.515. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
7
Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism.厌恶作为一种疾病规避机制。
Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):303-21. doi: 10.1037/a0014823.
8
Behavioral Immune System Responses to Coronavirus: A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Explanation of Conformity, Warmth Toward Others and Attitudes Toward Lockdown.行为免疫系统对冠状病毒的反应:对从众、对他人的温暖态度和对封锁态度的强化敏感性理论解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 26;11:566237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566237. eCollection 2020.
9
Distrust As a Disease Avoidance Strategy: Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity Regulate Generalized Social Trust.不信任作为一种疾病规避策略:厌恶敏感性的个体差异调节广义社会信任。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 28;7:1038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01038. eCollection 2016.
10
[Self-conciousness and conformity: moderating effects of conformity motives and task-interest].[自我意识与从众:从众动机和任务兴趣的调节作用]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2000 Oct;71(4):338-44. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.71.338.

引用本文的文献

1
How to activate threat perceptions in behavior research: A simple technique for inducing health and resource scarcity threats.如何在行为研究中激活威胁感知:一种诱导健康和资源稀缺威胁的简单技术。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8379-8395. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02481-6. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
2
Greater traditionalism predicts COVID-19 precautionary behaviors across 27 societies.传统文化主义预示着 27 个社会的 COVID-19 预防行为。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 11;13(1):4969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29655-0.

本文引用的文献

1
On Attenuated Interactions, Measurement Error, and Statistical Power: Guidelines for Social and Personality Psychologists.关于衰减的相互作用、测量误差和统计功效:社会和人格心理学家的指南。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Dec;46(12):1702-1711. doi: 10.1177/0146167220913363. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Visually Activating Pathogen Disgust: A New Instrument for Studying the Behavioral Immune System.视觉激活病原体厌恶:一种研究行为免疫系统的新工具。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 8;9:1397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01397. eCollection 2018.
3
Why do people vary in disgust?
为什么人们对厌恶的感觉存在差异?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Jul 19;373(1751). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0204.
4
Disgust as a mechanism for decision making under risk: Illuminating sex differences and individual risk-taking correlates of disgust propensity.厌恶作为风险决策的一种机制:揭示性别差异和个体风险偏好相关的厌恶倾向。
Emotion. 2018 Oct;18(7):942-958. doi: 10.1037/emo0000389. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences, Even After Controlling (Mindfully) for Autocorrelation: Reply to Tiokhin and Hruschka (2017).有证据表明,即使在(谨慎地)控制了自相关因素之后,埃博拉疫情仍影响了投票偏好:对蒂奥欣和赫鲁施卡(2017年)的回应。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1361-1363. doi: 10.1177/0956797617718183. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
6
No Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences in the 2014 Elections After Controlling for Time-Series Autocorrelation: A Commentary on Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016).没有证据表明在控制时间序列自相关后,埃博拉疫情影响了2014年选举中的投票偏好:对贝尔、霍弗和沙勒(2016年)的评论
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1358-1360. doi: 10.1177/0956797616680396. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Parasite stress and pathogen avoidance relate to distinct dimensions of political ideology across 30 nations.寄生虫压力和病原体规避与30个国家政治意识形态的不同维度相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 1;113(44):12408-12413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607398113. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
8
Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?感染与选举:埃博拉疫情是否影响了 2014 年美国联邦选举(如果有影响,具体是如何影响的)?
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):595-605. doi: 10.1177/0956797616628861. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
9
Does Incidental Disgust Amplify Moral Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Evidence.偶然的厌恶是否会放大道德判断?实验证据的元分析综述。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;10(4):518-36. doi: 10.1177/1745691615583128.
10
Best Friends: Alliances, Friend Ranking, and the MySpace Social Network.好友:联盟、好友排名和 MySpace 社交网络。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):6-8. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393979.