Pulmonary Diseases Unit, Department of Immunoallergic and Respiratory Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
Respiration. 2013;86(2):123-34. doi: 10.1159/000350466. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) is a safe and useful sampling technique for the diagnosis of mediastinal adenopathies/masses, but its accuracy seems to be influenced by selected clinical and procedural aspects.
We performed a systematic review to identify the main predictors of a successful transbronchial aspirate according to different clinical settings.
We searched Medline and Embase for all studies evaluating predictors of TBNA diagnostic yield, published up to February 2012. Two authors reviewed all titles/abstracts and retrieved the full text of articles that are potentially relevant to identify studies according to predefined selection criteria. The methodological quality of studies was assessed through the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Evidence synthesis was graded according to overall number of studies, patients involved and methodological features.
Fifty-three studies, involving more than 8,000 patients and evaluating 23 potential predictive factors, were included. Major predictors in an unselected population, as well as in patients with suspected/known lung cancer, included lymph node size (short axis length ≥ 2 cm), presence of abnormal endoscopic findings, subcarinal and right paratracheal location, and the use of histological needle by an experienced bronchoscopist. Stage I and sampling of more than one lymph node stations were the only predictors of a successful TBNA result in patients with suspected sarcoidosis.
The diagnostic yield of TBNA depends on selected clinical and procedural features. Knowledge of factors that predict a positive TBNA result may help optimize the diagnostic success of the procedure in different clinical settings.
经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)是一种安全且有用的纵隔淋巴结/肿块诊断取样技术,但它的准确性似乎受到选择的临床和程序方面的影响。
我们进行了一项系统回顾,以确定根据不同临床环境,TBNA 诊断成功率的主要预测因素。
我们在 Medline 和 Embase 上搜索了所有评估 TBNA 诊断产量预测因素的研究,这些研究的发表时间截至 2012 年 2 月。两名作者审查了所有标题/摘要,并检索了可能相关的文章全文,以根据预先确定的选择标准确定研究。通过修订的诊断准确性研究质量评估工具评估研究的方法学质量。根据研究的总数、涉及的患者和方法学特征对证据综合进行分级。
纳入了 53 项研究,涉及 8000 多名患者和 23 个潜在预测因素。在未选择的人群中以及在疑似/已知肺癌患者中,主要的预测因素包括淋巴结大小(短轴长度≥2cm)、存在异常内镜发现、隆突下和右气管旁位置,以及经验丰富的支气管镜医师使用组织学针。在疑似结节病患者中,仅Ⅰ期和取样超过一个淋巴结站是 TBNA 结果成功的唯一预测因素。
TBNA 的诊断成功率取决于选择的临床和程序特征。了解预测 TBNA 阳性结果的因素可能有助于优化该程序在不同临床环境下的诊断成功率。