Cohen-Hatton Sabrina R, Honey R C
School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Tower Building, Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK.
Learn Behav. 2013 Dec;41(4):379-89. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0113-y.
The source of renewal of instrumental responding in rats was investigated. In Experiment 1, two responses (R1 and R2) were reinforced with one outcome (O1) in contexts A and B (i.e., R1→O1, R2→O1), and then R2 was extinguished in A and R1 was extinguished in B. At test, the rate of R1 was higher than that of R2 in context A, and the reverse was the case in context B: Renewed responding was independent of the Pavlovian context→O1 associations. In Experiment 2, all rats received R1→O1 and R2→O2 trials in A and then were placed in B, where they were sated on O2 and either did (Group Extinction) or did not (Group No Extinction) receive concurrent extinction of R1 and R2. At test, we found more responding in A than in B for Group Extinction, but not for Group No Extinction, and the renewed responding in A was as sensitive to the current value of the outcome as responding that had not been subject to extinction (i.e., the rate was higher for R1 than for R2). That is, the renewed responding was goal-directed. These results identify the removal of contextual inhibion of either the response or the response→outcome associaon as potenal bases for renewal, and the response→outcome associaon as the source of renewed responding.
对大鼠工具性反应恢复的来源进行了研究。在实验1中,在情境A和情境B中,两种反应(R1和R2)都由一种结果(O1)强化(即,R1→O1,R2→O1),然后在情境A中对R2进行消退,在情境B中对R1进行消退。在测试时,情境A中R1的反应速率高于R2,情境B中则相反:反应恢复独立于巴甫洛夫式情境→O1关联。在实验2中,所有大鼠在情境A中接受R1→O1和R2→O2试验,然后被置于情境B中,在情境B中它们对O2感到满足,并且接受(消退组)或不接受(非消退组)R1和R2的同时消退。在测试时,我们发现消退组在情境A中的反应比在情境B中更多,但非消退组并非如此,并且情境A中的反应恢复对结果的当前价值与未经历消退的反应一样敏感(即,R1的反应速率高于R2)。也就是说,反应恢复是目标导向的。这些结果确定,去除对反应或反应→结果关联的情境抑制是反应恢复的潜在基础,而反应→结果关联是反应恢复的来源。