Todd Travis P
Department of Psychology, University of Vermont, John Dewey Hall, 2 Colchester Ave., Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2013 Jul;39(3):193-207. doi: 10.1037/a0032236. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
Four experiments with rats examined renewal of extinguished instrumental behavior when the reinforcement histories of the contexts were equated by giving complementary training and extinction of a different response (lever press and chain pull) in each context. In Experiments 1 through 3, renewal occurred when the response was tested in the acquisition context (ABA) or outside the extinction context (AAB and ABC). Further, in Experiments 1 through 3, when both responses were simultaneously available, there was a clear preference for the response that was not in its extinction context. In Experiment 4, renewal was not reduced when testing occurred in a context that had been associated with extinction of the other instrumental response. The experimental designs rule out differential context-reinforcer associations being the only contributing mechanism of renewal, and also raise questions about configural and occasion-setting accounts. The results are consistent with the idea that during extinction an inhibitory association is formed between the context and the response.
四项以大鼠为对象的实验,研究了在通过对不同反应(杠杆按压和链条拉动)在每个情境中给予互补训练和消退,使各情境的强化历史相等的情况下,已消退的工具性反应的恢复情况。在实验1至3中,当在习得情境(ABA)中或在消退情境之外(AAB和ABC)对反应进行测试时,出现了反应恢复。此外,在实验1至3中,当两种反应同时可用时,明显偏好不在其消退情境中的反应。在实验4中,当在与另一种工具性反应的消退相关联的情境中进行测试时,反应恢复并未减少。这些实验设计排除了不同的情境-强化物关联是反应恢复的唯一促成机制的可能性,同时也对构型和情境设定的解释提出了疑问。结果与这样的观点一致,即在消退过程中,情境与反应之间形成了抑制性关联。