Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(2):193-216. doi: 10.2190/HS.43.2.b.
This article draws on the vast evidence that suggests, on one hand, that socioeconomic inequalities in health are present in every society in which they have been measured and, on the other hand, that the size of inequalities varies substantially across societies. We conduct a comparative case study of the United States and Canada to explore the role of neoliberalism as a force that has created inequalities in socioeconomic resources (and thus in health) in both societies and the roles of other societal forces (political, economic, and social) that have provided a buffer, thereby lessening socioeconomic inequalities or their effects on health. Our findings suggest that, from 1980 to 2008, while both the United States and Canada underwent significant neoliberal reforms, Canada showed more resilience in terms of health inequalities as a result of differences in: (a) the degree of income inequality, itself resulting from differences in features of the labor market and tax and transfer policies, (b) equality in the provision of social goods such as health care and education, and (c) the extent of social cohesiveness across race/ethnic- and class-based groups. Our study suggests that further attention must be given to both causes and buffers of health inequalities.
本文借鉴了大量证据,一方面表明,在所有进行过测量的社会中,健康方面的社会经济不平等现象都普遍存在;另一方面表明,社会之间不平等的程度存在很大差异。我们对美国和加拿大进行了比较案例研究,以探讨新自由主义作为一种力量在这两个社会中造成社会经济资源不平等(从而导致健康不平等)的作用,以及其他社会力量(政治、经济和社会)的作用,这些力量提供了缓冲,从而减轻了社会经济不平等或其对健康的影响。我们的研究结果表明,从 1980 年到 2008 年,尽管美国和加拿大都经历了重大的新自由主义改革,但加拿大在健康不平等方面表现出更强的弹性,这主要是由于以下方面的差异:(a)收入不平等的程度,这是由劳动力市场和税收及转移政策特征的差异造成的;(b)在医疗保健和教育等社会商品的提供方面的平等;以及(c)不同种族/族裔和阶级群体之间的社会凝聚力程度。我们的研究表明,必须进一步关注健康不平等的原因和缓冲因素。