• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氧化铝对氧化铝与金属对传统聚乙烯:一项随访9至15年的随机临床试验。

Alumina on alumina versus metal on conventional polyethylene: a randomized clinical trial with 9 to 15 years follow-up.

作者信息

Vendittoli Pascal-André, Rivière Charles, Lavigne Martin, Lavoie Pauline, Alghamdi Ahmed, Duval Nicolas

机构信息

From the Montreal University Hospital, and the Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montréal, Québec.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Apr;79(2):181-90.

PMID:23821970
Abstract

We report the long-term results of a randomized clinical trial that compares, in total hip arthroplasty in a young population, metal-on-conventional polyethylene and alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings. One hundred and forty hips in 116 patients were randomized. Re-operation, revision rate, clinical scores, and radiological signs of osteolysis and loosening were compared at average follow-up of 123 (9-15) years. At final FU, 107 hips were available for clinical evaluation. Eight (11.6%) revisions were performed in the polyethylene group versus 1 (1.4%) in the ceramic group (p = 0.017). All revisions in the polyethylene group were related to bearing wear: 4 for aseptic loosening with severe osteolysis, 1 for polyethylene induced compressive granulomatous tumor, and 3 for severe liner wear. The only revised case from the ceramic group was secondary to mechanical stem loosening. Mean annual polyethylene wear was 0.19mm/year; wear was not measurable in the ceramic group. Our study confirms, in the long-term, the superiority of ceramic-on-ceramic pairing in comparison to metal-on-conventional polyethylene and supports their use in young, active patients.

摘要

我们报告了一项随机临床试验的长期结果,该试验比较了年轻人群全髋关节置换术中金属对传统聚乙烯和氧化铝对氧化铝陶瓷轴承的效果。116例患者的140个髋关节被随机分组。在平均123(9 - 15)年的随访中,比较了再次手术、翻修率、临床评分以及骨溶解和松动的放射学征象。在最终随访时,107个髋关节可进行临床评估。聚乙烯组进行了8例(11.6%)翻修,而陶瓷组为1例(1.4%)(p = 0.017)。聚乙烯组的所有翻修均与轴承磨损有关:4例因无菌性松动伴严重骨溶解,1例因聚乙烯诱导的压缩性肉芽肿肿瘤,3例因严重衬垫磨损。陶瓷组唯一的翻修病例继发于机械性柄松动。聚乙烯的年均磨损为0.19毫米/年;陶瓷组的磨损无法测量。我们的研究长期证实,与金属对传统聚乙烯相比,陶瓷对陶瓷配对具有优越性,并支持在年轻、活跃的患者中使用。

相似文献

1
Alumina on alumina versus metal on conventional polyethylene: a randomized clinical trial with 9 to 15 years follow-up.氧化铝对氧化铝与金属对传统聚乙烯:一项随访9至15年的随机临床试验。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Apr;79(2):181-90.
2
Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: update.陶瓷对陶瓷全髋关节置换术:最新进展
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7 Suppl):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.003.
3
Comparison of alumina-alumina to metal-polyethylene bearing surfaces in THA: a randomized study with 4- to 9-years follow-up.全髋关节置换术中氧化铝-氧化铝与金属-聚乙烯关节面的比较:一项随访4至9年的随机研究。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2007 Aug;73(4):468-77.
4
Alternative bearing surfaces: alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty.替代承重面:用于全髋关节置换术的氧化铝陶瓷轴承
Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:171-6.
5
Pure alumina bearings with cementless stems versus sandwich bearings with cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中无柄纯氧化铝轴承与柄水泥固定的三明治轴承比较。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2012 Jan;125(2):244-8.
6
Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearing: results after a minimum of twenty years of follow-up.初次非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术采用氧化铝陶瓷-陶瓷关节面:至少 20 年随访结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Mar;92(3):639-44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01829.
7
Long-term performance of ceramic and metal femoral heads on conventional polyethylene in young and active patients: a matched-pair analysis.年轻且活跃的患者中,常规聚乙烯对陶瓷和金属股骨头的长期性能:配对分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jul 3;95(13):1193-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00432.
8
Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A five-year minimum follow-up study.氧化铝对氧化铝全髋关节置换术。一项至少随访五年的研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87(3):530-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.01753.
9
Comparison of ten-year survivorship of hip prostheses with use of conventional polyethylene, metal-on-metal, or ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.比较使用传统聚乙烯、金属对金属或陶瓷对陶瓷轴承的髋关节假体十年生存率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Oct 3;94(19):1756-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01858.
10
Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomized study.用于全髋关节置换术的氧化铝陶瓷轴承:一项前瞻性随机研究的五年结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jul(436):164-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Head, acetabular liner composition, and rate of revision and wear in total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.头、髋臼衬里成分以及全髋关节置换术的翻修率和磨损:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 21;13(1):20327. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47670-z.
2
Risk factors for liner wear and head migration in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.髋关节置换术后髋臼内衬磨损和头迁移的危险因素:系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 20;13(1):15612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42809-4.
3
Are additional screws required for press-fit fixation of cementless acetabular cups? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
是否需要额外的螺钉来实现非骨水泥髋臼杯的压配固定?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Feb 10;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00629-8.
4
Early Short-Term Postoperative Mechanical Failures of Current Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing Total Hip Arthroplasties.当前陶瓷对陶瓷轴承全髋关节置换术后早期短期机械故障
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 24;13(23):5318. doi: 10.3390/ma13235318.
5
Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (34,020 Patients): What Have We Learnt?初次全髋关节置换术的随机对照试验概述(34020 例患者):我们学到了什么?
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Aug;4(8):e20.00120. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00120.
6
[Revision reasons and prosthesis selection of Crowe developmental dysplasia of hip after total hip arthroplasty].[全髋关节置换术后Crowe型髋关节发育不良的翻修原因及假体选择]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 May 15;34(5):557-562. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201909015.
7
Patient satisfaction related outcome after total hip arthroplasty; does bearing surface play a role?全髋关节置换术后与患者满意度相关的结果;承重表面起作用吗?
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Mar;11(Suppl 2):S196-S200. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
8
Recent updates for biomaterials used in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中生物材料的最新进展。
Biomater Res. 2018 Dec 5;22:33. doi: 10.1186/s40824-018-0144-8. eCollection 2018.
9
Do outcomes reported in randomised controlled trials of joint replacement surgery fulfil the OMERACT 2.0 Filter? A review of the 2008 and 2013 literature.关节置换手术随机对照试验报告的结果是否符合OMERACT 2.0筛选标准?对2008年和2013年文献的综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 May 30;6(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0498-3.
10
Is there any difference in survivorship of total hip arthroplasty with different bearing surfaces? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同关节面的全髋关节置换术在生存率上是否存在差异?一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):21871-85. eCollection 2015.