Suppr超能文献

利用计算机断层扫描分析颈椎的解剖特征以选择更安全的螺钉置入技术。

An analysis of the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography to select safer screw insertion techniques.

作者信息

Nishinome Masahiro, Iizuka Haku, Iizuka Yoichi, Takagishi Kenji

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2526-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2883-5. Epub 2013 Jul 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography (CT) to select safer screw insertion techniques, particularly emphasizing the location of the transverse foramen.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent multiplanar CT reconstruction were evaluated. There were 34 males and 16 females with an average age of 67 years. The parameters included the following measurements: foramen width (the size of the transverse foramen FW), foramen height (the size of the transverse foramen FH), pedicle width (PW), foramen angle (FA the position of the transverse foramen), pedicle transverse angle (PTA) and lateral mass angle (LMA).

RESULTS

The mean FW ranged from 6.2 to 6.3 mm (n.s). The mean FH ranged from 5.0 to 5.7 mm, with significant differences between each vertebra, except for the FH between C4 and C5 and the FH between C5 and C6. The mean PW ranged from 5.4 to 6.1 mm. There were significant differences between each vertebra, except for the PW between C3 and C4 and the PW between C3 and C5. The mean FA ranged from 18.8° to 20.5°. There were significant differences between each vertebra, except for the FA between C3 and C6 and the FA between C4 and C5. The mean PTA ranged from 37.1° to 45.4°. There were significant differences between each vertebra, except for the PTA between C3 and C5. The mean LMA ranged from 1.0° to 5.3°. There were significant differences between each vertebra, except for the LMA between C4 and C5. The FW and FH exhibited no correlations with PW, PTA or LMA. FA was found to be positively correlated with both PTA and LMA. There was also a positive correlation between PTA and LMA.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that in cases in which pedicle screw insertion is difficult, lateral mass screws (LMS) can be inserted safely and longer sizes can be selected. In contrast, in cases in which LMS insertion is difficult, the insertion of pedicle screws can be performed relatively easy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用计算机断层扫描(CT)评估颈椎的解剖特征,以选择更安全的螺钉植入技术,尤其着重于横突孔的位置。

方法

对50例行多平面CT重建的患者进行评估。其中男性34例,女性16例,平均年龄67岁。测量参数包括:横突孔宽度(横突孔大小FW)、横突孔高度(横突孔大小FH)、椎弓根宽度(PW)、横突孔角度(FA横突孔的位置)、椎弓根横角(PTA)和侧块角度(LMA)。

结果

平均FW范围为6.2至6.3毫米(无显著差异)。平均FH范围为5.0至5.7毫米,除C4与C5之间以及C5与C6之间的FH外,各椎体之间存在显著差异。平均PW范围为5.4至6.1毫米。除C3与C4之间以及C3与C5之间的PW外,各椎体之间存在显著差异。平均FA范围为18.8°至20.5°。除C3与C6之间以及C4与C5之间的FA外,各椎体之间存在显著差异。平均PTA范围为37.1°至45.4°。除C3与C5之间的PTA外,各椎体之间存在显著差异。平均LMA范围为1.0°至5.3°。除C4与C5之间的LMA外,各椎体之间存在显著差异。FW和FH与PW、PTA或LMA均无相关性。发现FA与PTA和LMA均呈正相关。PTA和LMA之间也存在正相关。

结论

我们建议,在椎弓根螺钉植入困难的情况下,可以安全地植入侧块螺钉(LMS)并选择更长的尺寸。相反,在LMS植入困难的情况下,椎弓根螺钉的植入相对容易进行。

相似文献

1
An analysis of the anatomic features of the cervical spine using computed tomography to select safer screw insertion techniques.
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22(11):2526-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2883-5. Epub 2013 Jul 6.
3
Optimal cervical screw insertion angle determined by means of computed tomography scans pre- and postoperatively.
Spine J. 2017 Feb;17(2):190-195. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.08.025. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
4
Computer tomography-based morphometric analysis of the cervical spine pedicles C3-C7.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Apr;160(4):863-871. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3481-4. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):415-420. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16803. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
A new anatomical approach of cervical lateral mass for cervical pedicle screw and paravertebral foramen screw insertion.
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 18;14(7):e0219119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219119. eCollection 2019.
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
2
Subaxial Lateral Mass Prosthesis for Posterior Reconstruction of Cervical Spine.
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;84(4):316-320. doi: 10.1055/a-1739-2488. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
4
The Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw for Cervical Spine Diseases: The Review of Technical Developments and Complication Avoidance.
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 May 15;60(5):231-243. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2019-0189. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Computerized Tomography-Based Morphometric Analysis of Subaxial Cervical Spine Pedicle in Asymptomatic Indian Population.
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):112-120. doi: 10.14444/5017. eCollection 2018 Apr.
8
9
Morphometric subaxial lateral mass evaluation allows for preoperative optimal screw trajectory planning.
Eur Spine J. 2014 Aug;23(8):1705-11. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3350-7. Epub 2014 May 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Anatomy of subaxial cervical foramens: the safety zone for lateral mass screwing.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):309-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1984-2. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
3
Freehand determination of the trajectory angle for cervical lateral mass screws: how accurate is it?
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):972-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1694-9. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
7
Cervical pedicle screw placement: feasibility and accuracy of two new insertion techniques based on morphometric data.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Jan;16(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0104-1. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
10
Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 15;29(22):2510-4; discussion 2515. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144404.68486.85.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验