• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过关注以预防为重点的动机来改善洪水风险沟通。

Improving flood risk communication by focusing on prevention-focused motivation.

作者信息

de Boer Joop, Botzen W J Wouter, Terpstra Teun

机构信息

Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2014 Feb;34(2):309-22. doi: 10.1111/risa.12091. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12091
PMID:23834075
Abstract

This article proposes an approach to flood risk communication that gives particular emphasis to the distinction between prevention and promotion motivation. According to E. Tory Higgins, the promotion system and the prevention system are assumed to coexist in every person, but one or the other may be temporarily or chronically more accessible. These insights have far-reaching implications for our understanding of people's reasoning about risks. Flood risk communication framed in terms of prevention involves the notions of chance and harm, woven into a story about particular events that necessitate decisions to be more careful about safety issues and protect one's family and oneself from danger. The article describes how the insights worked out in practice, using a flood risk communication experiment among a sample from the general population in a highly populated river delta of the Netherlands. It had a posttest-only control group design (n = 2,302). The results showed that risk communication had a large effect on the participants' responses and that this effect was higher among chronic prevention-focused people than among others. Any information that increased the fit between a prevention-framed message and a person's chronic prevention motivation produced stronger situationally induced, prevention-focused responses. This may significantly improve communication about risks. In contrast, the notion of water city projects, featuring waterside living, had more appeal to promotion-focused people.

摘要

本文提出了一种洪水风险沟通方法,特别强调预防动机与促进动机之间的区别。根据E. 托里·希金斯的观点,促进系统和预防系统被认为在每个人身上同时存在,但其中一个可能暂时或长期更容易被激活。这些见解对我们理解人们对风险的推理具有深远影响。以预防为框架的洪水风险沟通涉及可能性和危害的概念,并融入到一个关于特定事件的故事中,这些事件需要人们做出决定,更加谨慎地对待安全问题,并保护自己的家人和自己免受危险。本文描述了这些见解在实践中的应用方式,通过在荷兰人口密集的三角洲地区对普通人群样本进行的洪水风险沟通实验来进行说明。该实验采用了仅后测控制组设计(n = 2302)。结果表明,风险沟通对参与者的反应有很大影响,并且这种影响在长期以预防为重点的人群中比在其他人群中更大。任何增加以预防为框架的信息与个人长期预防动机之间契合度的信息,都会产生更强的情境诱导的、以预防为重点的反应。这可能会显著改善关于风险的沟通。相比之下,以水边生活为特色的水城项目概念对以促进为重点的人群更有吸引力。

相似文献

1
Improving flood risk communication by focusing on prevention-focused motivation.通过关注以预防为重点的动机来改善洪水风险沟通。
Risk Anal. 2014 Feb;34(2):309-22. doi: 10.1111/risa.12091. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
2
More Than Fear Induction: Toward an Understanding of People's Motivation to Be Well-Prepared for Emergencies in Flood-Prone Areas.不仅仅是恐惧诱导:理解人们为洪水易发地区的紧急情况做好充分准备的动机。
Risk Anal. 2015 Mar;35(3):518-35. doi: 10.1111/risa.12289. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
3
Does communicating (flood) risk affect (flood) risk perceptions? Results of a quasi-experimental study.传达洪水风险会影响对洪水风险的认知吗?一项准实验研究的结果。
Risk Anal. 2009 Aug;29(8):1141-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01252.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
4
You have been framed! How antecedents of information need mediate the effects of risk communication messages.你被陷害了!信息需求的前因如何调节风险沟通信息的效果。
Risk Anal. 2014 Aug;34(8):1506-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12181. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
5
"Know What to Do If You Encounter a Flash Flood": Mental Models Analysis for Improving Flash Flood Risk Communication and Public Decision Making.“了解遭遇突发洪水时该怎么做”:改善突发洪水风险沟通与公众决策的心智模型分析
Risk Anal. 2016 Feb;36(2):411-27. doi: 10.1111/risa.12480. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
6
2010-2011 Queensland floods: using Haddon's Matrix to define and categorise public safety strategies.2010-2011 年昆士兰洪灾:利用 Haddon 矩阵定义和分类公共安全策略。
Emerg Med Australas. 2013 Aug;25(4):345-52. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12097. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
7
Flood risk assessment in The Netherlands: a case study for dike ring South Holland.荷兰的洪水风险评估:南荷兰堤防区的案例研究
Risk Anal. 2008 Oct;28(5):1357-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01103.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
8
How People's Motivational System and Situational Motivation Influence Their Risky Financial Choices.人们的动机系统和情境动机如何影响他们的风险金融选择。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1360. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01360. eCollection 2016.
9
Flash flood awareness in southwest Virginia.弗吉尼亚州西南部的山洪暴发预警
Risk Anal. 2007 Feb;27(1):155-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00866.x.
10
Living behind dikes: mimicking flooding experiences.生活在堤坝后面:模拟洪水体验。
Risk Anal. 2013 May;33(5):866-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01868.x. Epub 2012 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The 2021 Western Germany flood event: The value of flood risk dissemination strategies and social media.2021年德国西部洪水事件:洪水风险传播策略与社交媒体的价值
Jamba. 2022 Dec 9;14(1):1322. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v14i1.1322. eCollection 2022.
2
Risk communication and adaptive behaviour in flood-prone areas of Austria: A Q-methodology study on opinions of affected homeowners.洪水多发区的风险沟通和适应行为:受影响房主意见的 Q 方法研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233551. eCollection 2020.
3
Characters matter: How narratives shape affective responses to risk communication.
角色很重要:叙事如何塑造对风险沟通的情感反应。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 9;14(12):e0225968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225968. eCollection 2019.