Suppr超能文献

人类人畜共患布鲁氏菌病诊断程序的新进展。

New developments in the diagnostic procedures for zoonotic brucellosis in humans.

作者信息

Al Dahouk S, Sprague L D, Neubauer H

机构信息

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Diedersdorfer Weg 1, D-12277 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Rev Sci Tech. 2013 Apr;32(1):177-88. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2204.

Abstract

At present, laboratory diagnosis of human brucellosis is based on isolation of the bacteria from clinical samples followed by standard microbiological tube testing, detection of anti-Brucella antibodies using various serological tests, and the use of molecular methods for the detection of Brucella DNA. None of these diagnostic tools can be used on its own to reliably detect the causative agent. Cultures give a low yield and subsequent phenotypic characterisation is time consuming, meaning that the initiation of adequate antibiotic therapy is frequently delayed. Serological tests seem to be more effective but are not internationally standardised. Moreover, antibodies can remain detectable despite successful therapy, cross-reacting antibodies may occur, and variable cut-offs for different levels of endemicity are lacking. Molecular assays may reduce diagnostic delays in clinical laboratories, but diagnostic criteria for active infection have not yet been defined. This article reviews the latest microbiological methods for the diagnosis of human brucellosis and outlines developments for the future.

摘要

目前,人类布鲁氏菌病的实验室诊断基于从临床样本中分离细菌,随后进行标准微生物学试管检测、使用各种血清学检测方法检测抗布鲁氏菌抗体,以及使用分子方法检测布鲁氏菌DNA。这些诊断工具都不能单独用于可靠地检测病原体。培养物的检出率低,后续的表型鉴定耗时,这意味着适当抗生素治疗的启动经常延迟。血清学检测似乎更有效,但尚未实现国际标准化。此外,尽管治疗成功,抗体仍可能被检测到,可能会出现交叉反应抗体,并且缺乏针对不同流行程度的可变临界值。分子检测可能会减少临床实验室的诊断延迟,但活动性感染的诊断标准尚未确定。本文综述了人类布鲁氏菌病诊断的最新微生物学方法,并概述了未来的发展方向。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验