British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 3;8(7):e66981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066981. Print 2013.
Recent scientific interest following the "discovery" of lithodid crabs around Antarctica has centred on a hypothesis that these crabs might be poised to invade the Antarctic shelf if the recent warming trend continues, potentially decimating its native fauna. This "invasion hypothesis" suggests that decapod crabs were driven out of Antarctica 40-15 million years ago and are only now returning as "warm" enough habitats become available. The hypothesis is based on a geographically and spatially poor fossil record of a different group of crabs (Brachyura), and examination of relatively few Recent lithodid samples from the Antarctic slope. In this paper, we examine the existing lithodid fossil record and present the distribution and biogeographic patterns derived from over 16,000 records of Recent Southern Hemisphere crabs and lobsters. Globally, the lithodid fossil record consists of only two known specimens, neither of which comes from the Antarctic. Recent records show that 22 species of crabs and lobsters have been reported from the Southern Ocean, with 12 species found south of 60 °S. All are restricted to waters warmer than 0 °C, with their Antarctic distribution limited to the areas of seafloor dominated by Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW). Currently, CDW extends further and shallower onto the West Antarctic shelf than the known distribution ranges of most lithodid species examined. Geological evidence suggests that West Antarctic shelf could have been available for colonisation during the last 9,000 years. Distribution patterns, species richness, and levels of endemism all suggest that, rather than becoming extinct and recently re-invading from outside Antarctica, the lithodid crabs have likely persisted, and even radiated, on or near to Antarctic slope. We conclude there is no evidence for a modern-day "crab invasion". We recommend a repeated targeted lithodid sampling program along the West Antarctic shelf to fully test the validity of the "invasion hypothesis".
最近,随着在南极洲周围“发现”石蟹,科学界的兴趣集中在一个假设上,即如果最近的变暖趋势持续下去,这些螃蟹可能准备入侵南极大陆架,可能会使当地的动物群大量减少。这种“入侵假说”表明,4000 万至 1500 万年前,十足目螃蟹被逐出南极洲,现在只有当足够温暖的栖息地出现时,它们才会重新出现。这一假说基于对另一组螃蟹(短尾亚目)的地理和空间记录较差的化石,以及对来自南极斜坡的相对较少的现代石蟹样本的检查。在本文中,我们检查了现有的石蟹化石记录,并展示了从超过 16000 个南大洋螃蟹和龙虾的现代记录中得出的分布和生物地理模式。在全球范围内,石蟹的化石记录仅由两个已知的标本组成,它们都不是来自南极洲。最近的记录表明,在南大洋已经发现了 22 种螃蟹和龙虾,其中 12 种分布在南纬 60°以南。所有这些都局限于水温高于 0°C 的水域,它们在南极的分布仅限于由环极深海水(CDW)主导的海底区域。目前,CDW 延伸到更靠近西南极大陆架的地方,比大多数检查过的石蟹物种的已知分布范围还要浅。地质证据表明,在过去的 9000 年里,西南极大陆架可能已经可供殖民化。分布模式、物种丰富度和特有程度都表明,石蟹可能已经在南极斜坡上或附近持续存在,甚至辐射扩散,而不是灭绝后最近才从南极洲以外重新入侵。我们的结论是,没有现代“螃蟹入侵”的证据。我们建议在西南极大陆架上重复进行有针对性的石蟹采样计划,以充分检验“入侵假说”的有效性。