Charles M-A
Inserm U1018, centre de recherche en épidémiologie et santé des populations (CESP), équipe épidémiologie environnementale des cancers, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94807 Villejuif, France.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013 Aug;61 Suppl 3:S133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
According to the theory of the developmental origins of adult health and disease, development in utero and in the first years of life are critical phases during which susceptibility to many chronic diseases is set. Diseases eventually occur only if the environment and lifestyle in later life is favorable. Exposure to chemicals (environmental or drug), to infectious agents, unbalanced nutrition, or psychosocial stress prenatally or in the first months/years of life are all factors which have been shown to impact long-term health of individuals. The consequences, however, are not limited to health. A demonstrative example was provided by the study of the influenza epidemic of 1918-1919 in the United States. Nationwide, it was estimated that the loss of income over a lifetime for individuals exposed during fetal life to this epidemic amounted to 14 billion dollars. This example demonstrates that an exposure during fetal life, which is not socially differentiated, may affect the social situation of individuals in adulthood. In many situations, it is much more difficult to separate the specific effect of a given exposure from the overall effect of the social environment. Indeed, it has been shown that socioeconomic status in childhood is associated with increased risk of mortality in adulthood, even after accounting for the socioeconomic status and risky behaviors in adulthood. Among the explanations, the theory of developmental origins of health credits of biological plausibility the model of critical periods early in which the individual is particularly vulnerable to certain exposures. Thus, ensuring the best conditions for the biological, physical, emotional and cognitive development of children in early life will enable them to reach their potential in terms of health and socioeconomic return to society. Investment in this period also brings the hope of reducing the perpetuation of social inequalities and health from generation to generation.
根据成人健康与疾病发育起源理论,子宫内及生命最初几年的发育是关键阶段,在此期间会确定对许多慢性病的易感性。只有在晚年的环境和生活方式适宜时,疾病才会最终发生。产前或生命最初几个月/几年接触化学物质(环境或药物)、感染因子、营养不均衡或心理社会压力,都是已被证明会影响个体长期健康的因素。然而,其后果并不局限于健康方面。1918 - 1919年美国流感大流行的研究提供了一个典型例子。据估计,在胎儿期接触此次大流行的个体一生的收入损失达140亿美元。这个例子表明,胎儿期的接触,无论社会差异如何,都可能影响个体成年后的社会状况。在许多情况下,将特定接触的具体影响与社会环境的总体影响区分开来要困难得多。事实上,研究表明,即使考虑到成年后的社会经济地位和危险行为,童年时期的社会经济地位与成年后较高的死亡风险相关。在各种解释中,健康发育起源理论认为关键期模型具有生物学合理性,即在早期个体特别容易受到某些接触的影响。因此,确保儿童生命早期在生物、身体、情感和认知发展方面的最佳条件,将使他们能够在健康和对社会的社会经济回报方面发挥潜力。在这一时期进行投资也带来了减少社会不平等和健康问题代代相传的希望。