Exercise Physiology Lab, Institute of Human Movement Sciences, ETH Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sports Med. 2013 Nov;43(11):1157-70. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0077-2.
Although physical exercise is recommended for asthmatics, evidence on the effects of exercise on clinical key factors is still missing.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of exercise training (EXT) on quality of life (QoL), bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), lung function and exercise capacity, plus the factors affecting changes in QoL and exercise capacity in asthmatics after a period of EXT.
A computerized search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (last search on 15 November 2012), without language restriction, and references of original studies and reviews were searched for further relevant studies.
Two independent investigators screened full-text studies with asthmatic subjects undertaking EXT (defined as training for ≥7 days, ≥2 times per week, ≥5 training sessions in total) that assessed at least one of the following outcomes: QoL, airway hyperreactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), peak expiratory flow (PEF), inflammatory parameters, exercise capacity, or exercise endurance. Potentially relevant studies were excluded if only respiratory muscle training, breathing exercises or yoga was performed, if asthmatic subjects with co-morbidities were investigated, if only data of mixed patient groups without separate results for asthmatics were presented, if training regimens were not sufficiently specified, if no numerical outcome data were presented, and if new long-term medication was introduced in addition to physical training. Of 500 potentially relevant articles, 13.4 % (67 studies including 2,059 subjects) met the eligibility criteria and were included for further analyses.
Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to determine the effect of EXT on asthma symptoms, BHR, EIB, FEV₁, exercise capacity and exercise endurance compared with control training. In addition, relative pre/post changes were analysed in all RCTs and controlled trials. Finally, multiple linear regression models were used to identify effects of relative changes in airway hyperreactivity (BHR or EIB), lung function (FEV₁ or PEF) and training hours on QoL and exercise performance.
In a total of 17 studies including 599 subjects, meta-analyses showed a significant improvement in days without asthma symptoms, FEV1 and exercise capacity while BHR only tended to improve. The analysis of relative within-group changes after EXT showed, however, significant improvements in QoL (17 %), BHR (53 %), EIB (9 %), and FEV1 (3 %) compared with control conditions. Multiple linear regression models revealed that changes in airway hyperreactivity and lung function significantly contributed to the change in QoL, while mainly the changes in airway hyperreactivity contributed to the change in exercise capacity.
EXT was shown to improve asthma symptoms, QoL, exercise capacity, BHR, EIB, and FEV1 in asthmatics and improvements in BHR explained part of the improvement in QoL and exercise capacity. Thus, physical activity should be recommended as a supplementary therapy to medication. However, more well controlled studies should be performed assessing the relationship of physical activity, QoL, airway hyperreactivity, lung function and especially airway inflammation as well as medication intake.
尽管运动锻炼被推荐用于哮喘患者,但有关运动锻炼对临床关键因素影响的证据仍缺失。
我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以确定运动训练(EXT)对生活质量(QoL)、气道高反应性(BHR)、运动诱导性支气管收缩(EIB)、肺功能和运动能力的影响,以及在 EXT 后哮喘患者的 QoL 和运动能力变化的影响因素。
计算机检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 CINAHL(最后检索日期为 2012 年 11 月 15 日),无语言限制,并检索原始研究和综述的参考文献以获取进一步相关研究。
两名独立研究者筛选了接受 EXT(定义为≥7 天,≥2 次/周,总共≥5 次训练)的哮喘患者的全文研究,这些研究评估了以下至少一项结果:QoL、气道高反应性、一秒用力呼气量(FEV₁)、呼气峰流速(PEF)、炎症参数、运动能力或运动耐力。如果仅进行呼吸肌训练、呼吸练习或瑜伽、如果研究合并症的哮喘患者、如果仅呈现混合患者组的数据而没有哮喘患者的单独结果、如果训练方案未充分说明、如果没有呈现数值结果数据以及如果除了体育锻炼之外还引入了新的长期药物,则将潜在相关的研究排除在外。在 500 篇潜在相关文章中,有 13.4%(67 项研究包括 2059 例患者)符合入选标准并纳入进一步分析。
根据 Cochrane 系统评价干预措施手册进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。对所有随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,以确定 EXT 对哮喘症状、BHR、EIB、FEV₁、运动能力和运动耐力的影响,与对照训练相比。此外,在所有 RCT 和对照试验中还分析了相对前后变化。最后,使用多元线性回归模型来确定气道高反应性(BHR 或 EIB)、肺功能(FEV₁ 或 PEF)和训练时间的相对变化对 QoL 和运动表现的影响。
在总共 17 项包括 599 例患者的研究中,荟萃分析显示哮喘症状、FEV₁ 和运动能力明显改善,而 BHR 仅倾向于改善。EXT 后相对组内变化的分析显示,与对照条件相比,QoL(17%)、BHR(53%)、EIB(9%)和 FEV1(3%)明显改善。多元线性回归模型显示,气道高反应性和肺功能的变化对 QoL 的变化有显著贡献,而气道高反应性的变化主要对运动能力的变化有贡献。
EXT 可改善哮喘患者的哮喘症状、QoL、运动能力、BHR、EIB 和 FEV1,BHR 的改善部分解释了 QoL 和运动能力的改善。因此,应推荐体力活动作为药物治疗的补充疗法。然而,应该进行更多的对照研究,以评估体力活动、QoL、气道高反应性、肺功能,特别是气道炎症与药物摄入之间的关系。