• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体骨内植入水平对不同连接设计骨折强度的影响:一项体外研究。

Influence of bone insertion level of the implant on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study.

作者信息

Gehrke Sergio Alexandre, Souza Dos Santos Vianna Miriam, Dedavid Berenice Anina

机构信息

Department of Implantology, Catholic University of Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay,

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1039-7. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-013-1039-7
PMID:23860902
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present in vitro study was to assess resistance to static fatigue of implants with different connections at various insertion levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty implants and abutments were used with the smallest diameter of each model. Four groups (n = 15) were created on the basis of the implant design and connection: cylindrical external hexagon Ø3.30 mm (group 1), cylindrical internal hexagon Ø3.30 mm (group 2), conical internal hexagon Ø3.50 mm (group 3), and conical Morse taper Ø3.50 mm (group 4). Three insertion levels in resin were tested, 0 mm at the platform level (l1), 3 mm (l2), and 5 mm (l3) above the platform of the resin. All groups were subjected to quasi-static loading at 30° to the implant axis in a universal machine.

RESULTS

The mean fracture strengths for group 1 were 1,991 N (l1), 1,020 N (l2), and 767 N (l3); for group 2: 2,119 N (l1), 1,034 N (l2), and 903 N (l3); for group 3: 2,373 N (l1), 1,407 N (l2), and 929 N (l3); and for group 4: 1,710 N (l1), 1,680 N (l2), and 1,182 N (l3).

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance to loading decreases significantly with the loss of insertion, and the connection design between the implants and abutments can change the performance and resistance of the system.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When implants are used in areas where there is a possibility of bone loss, the selection of a connection type is an important consideration for the longevity of the system.

摘要

目的

本体外研究的目的是评估不同连接方式的种植体在不同植入深度时的抗静态疲劳性能。

材料与方法

使用了60个种植体和基台,每个型号均采用最小直径。根据种植体设计和连接方式分为四组(n = 15):3.30毫米圆柱形外六角形(第1组)、3.30毫米圆柱形内六角形(第2组)、3.50毫米圆锥形内六角形(第3组)和3.50毫米圆锥形莫氏锥度(第4组)。测试了树脂中三个植入深度,树脂平台水平处为0毫米(l1)、高于树脂平台3毫米(l2)和5毫米(l3)。所有组在万能试验机中以与种植体长轴成30°角的方向进行准静态加载。

结果

第1组的平均断裂强度分别为1991牛(l1)、1020牛(l2)和767牛(l3);第2组:2119牛(l1)、1034牛(l2)和903牛(l3);第3组:2373牛(l1)、1407牛(l2)和929牛(l3);第4组:1710牛(l1)、1680牛(l2)和1182牛(l3)。

结论

随着植入深度的减少,抗加载能力显著降低,种植体与基台之间的连接设计可改变系统的性能和抗加载能力。

临床意义

当种植体用于可能发生骨质流失的区域时,连接类型的选择是系统长期使用的重要考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Influence of bone insertion level of the implant on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study.种植体骨内植入水平对不同连接设计骨折强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1039-7. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
2
Importance of Crown Height Ratios in Dental Implants on the Fracture Strength of Different Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.牙冠高度比在不同连接设计的种植牙断裂强度中的重要性:一项体外研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):790-7. doi: 10.1111/cid.12165. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
3
Probability of Failure of Internal Hexagon and Morse Taper Implants with Different Bone Levels: A Mechanical Test and Probabilistic Fatigue.不同骨水平的内六角和莫氏锥度种植体的失败概率:一项力学测试和概率疲劳分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1266-1273. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6426.
4
Effects of different switched or not-switched implant and abutment platform designs and marginal bone loss on fracture strength: An in vitro study.不同是否转换种植体和基台平台设计以及边缘骨吸收对骨折强度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jul;128(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.038. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
5
Analysis of Implant Strength After Implantoplasty in Three Implant-Abutment Connection Designs: An In Vitro Study.三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体成形术后种植体强度分析:一项体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 May-Jun;31(3):e65-70. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4399.
6
Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs.三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体周围骨裂阻力。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):e691-e699. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23700.
7
Comparative analysis of the mechanical limits of resistance in implant/abutment set of a new implant design: An in vitro study.新型种植体设计的种植体/基台连接体抗阻力机械极限的对比分析:一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280684. eCollection 2023.
8
Influence of the Prosthetic Index on Fracture Resistance of Morse Taper Dental Implants.种植体轴性负载下的修复指数对莫氏锥度种植体抗折强度的影响
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):1333-1337. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4658.
9
Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: in vitro study.具有内连接和外连接的修复基台/种植体界面的微渗漏:体外研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Sep;25(9):1078-83. doi: 10.1111/clr.12217. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
Fracture Resistance of Implant Abutments Following Abutment Alterations by Milling the Margins: An In Vitro Study.
J Oral Implantol. 2016 Dec;42(6):464-468. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00010. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Factors on Dental Implant Fractures: A Systematic Review.牙种植体骨折的临床因素:一项系统评价。
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;12(7):200. doi: 10.3390/dj12070200.
2
Biomechanical behavior of implants with different diameters in relation to simulated bone loss- an in vitro study.不同直径种植体与模拟骨量损失关系的生物力学行为:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):5887-5894. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05199-5. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3
Comparative analysis of the mechanical limits of resistance in implant/abutment set of a new implant design: An in vitro study.

本文引用的文献

1
Etiology, risk factors and management of implant fractures.种植体骨折的病因、危险因素及处理。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 May 1;15(3):e504-8. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e504.
2
A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.一项关于平台型与牙根型钛牙种植体骨愈合动力学的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):232-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01640.x.
3
Observations on an in-vivo failure of a titanium dental implant/abutment screw system: a case report.钛牙种植体/基台螺钉系统体内失效的观察:一例病例报告。
新型种植体设计的种植体/基台连接体抗阻力机械极限的对比分析:一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280684. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of Marginal Bone Integrity and Aftermarket Abutment Screws on Dental Implant Systems-A Preliminary Study with Finite Element Method.边缘骨完整性和售后基台螺钉对牙种植系统的影响——有限元法的初步研究
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 28;15(17):5952. doi: 10.3390/ma15175952.
5
Effect of implantoplasty on the elastic limit of dental implants of different diameters.种植体成形术对不同直径种植体弹性极限的影响。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Aug 24;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00363-6.
6
Effect of bone loss on the fracture resistance of narrow dental implants after implantoplasty. An in vitro study.骨量损失对种植体成形术后窄径种植体抗折力的影响:一项体外研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 Sep 1;26(5):e611-e618. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24624.
7
Does implantoplasty affect the failure strength of narrow and regular diameter implants? A laboratory study.种植体成形术是否会影响窄径和标准直径种植体的失败强度?一项实验室研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):2203-2211. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03534-8. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Fracture resistance after implantoplasty in three implant-abutment connection designs.三种种植体-基台连接设计的种植体周围骨裂阻力。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020 Sep 1;25(5):e691-e699. doi: 10.4317/medoral.23700.
9
Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.用于内部三通道和外部六角形种植体连接的氧化锆基台和钛基台的适配精度和扭矩保持力比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;9(4):271-277. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.271. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
10
Long-Term Fatigue and Its Probability of Failure Applied to Dental Implants.长期疲劳及其应用于牙种植体的失效概率。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8927156. doi: 10.1155/2016/8927156. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Apr;89(1):264-73. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31211.
4
The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.牙种植体的交错植入及其对骨应力的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Sep;9(3):121-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00055.x.
5
Use of mini implants for replacement and immediate loading of 2 single-tooth restorations: a clinical case report.使用微型种植体进行2颗单牙修复体的替换和即刻加载:1例临床病例报告
J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(2):82-6. doi: 10.1563/794.1.
6
Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.假体高度、力的施加角度和植入物偏移对支撑骨影响的有限元分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(6):819-25.
7
Effect of lateral cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of an external hexagon implant system.侧向循环加载对外六角种植体系统基台螺丝松动的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):326-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.01.001.
8
Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):167-71.
9
Computational simulations of stress shielding and bone resorption around existing and computer-designed orthopaedic screws.现有及计算机设计的骨科螺钉周围应力屏蔽和骨吸收的计算机模拟
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002 May;40(3):311-22. doi: 10.1007/BF02344213.
10
Fracture of dental implants: literature review and report of a case.牙种植体骨折:文献综述及病例报告
Implant Dent. 2002;11(2):137-43. doi: 10.1097/00008505-200204000-00014.