• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于内部三通道和外部六角形种植体连接的氧化锆基台和钛基台的适配精度和扭矩保持力比较。

Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.

作者信息

Siadat Hakimeh, Beyabanaki Elaheh, Mousavi Niloufar, Alikhasi Marzieh

机构信息

Implant Research Center and Department of Prosthodontics and Implant, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Prosthodontics Department, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;9(4):271-277. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.271. Epub 2017 Aug 16.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.271
PMID:28874994
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5582093/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of implant connection design (external vs. internal) on the fit discrepancy and torque loss of zirconia and titanium abutments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two regular platform dental implants, one with external connection (Brånemark, Nobel Biocare AB) and the other with internal connection (Noble Replace, Nobel Biocare AB), were selected. Seven titanium and seven customized zirconia abutments were used for each connection design. Measurements of geometry, marginal discrepancy, and rotational freedom were done using video measuring machine. To measure the torque loss, each abutment was torqued to 35 Ncm and then opened by means of a digital torque wrench. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and t-test at α=0.05 of significance.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the geometrical measurements and rotational freedom between abutments of two connection groups (<.001). Also, the results showed significant differences between titanium abutments of internal and external connection implants in terms of rotational freedom (<.001). Not only customized internal abutments but also customized external abutments did not have the exact geometry of prefabricated abutments (<.001). However, neither connection type (=.15) nor abutment material (=.38) affected torque loss.

CONCLUSION

Abutments with internal connection showed less rotational freedom. However, better marginal fit was observed in externally connected abutments. Also, customized abutments with either connection could not duplicate the exact geometry of their corresponding prefabricated abutment. However, neither abutment connection nor material affected torque loss values.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估种植体连接设计(外部连接与内部连接)对氧化锆和钛基台的适合性差异和扭矩损失的影响。

材料与方法

选择两种常规平台牙科种植体,一种为外部连接(Brånemark,诺贝尔生物保健公司),另一种为内部连接(Noble Replace,诺贝尔生物保健公司)。每种连接设计使用七个钛基台和七个定制氧化锆基台。使用视频测量仪进行几何形状、边缘差异和旋转自由度的测量。为测量扭矩损失,将每个基台扭矩至35 Ncm,然后用数字扭矩扳手松开。数据采用双向方差分析和t检验进行分析,显著性水平α = 0.05。

结果

两个连接组基台之间的几何测量和旋转自由度存在显著差异(<.001)。此外,结果显示,内部和外部连接种植体的钛基台在旋转自由度方面存在显著差异(<.001)。不仅定制的内部基台,而且定制的外部基台都没有预制基台的精确几何形状(<.001)。然而,连接类型(=.15)和基台材料(=.38)均未影响扭矩损失。

结论

内部连接的基台旋转自由度较小。然而,外部连接的基台边缘适合性更好。此外,任何一种连接方式的定制基台都无法复制其相应预制基台的精确几何形状。然而,基台连接和材料均未影响扭矩损失值。

相似文献

1
Comparison of fit accuracy and torque maintenance of zirconia and titanium abutments for internal tri-channel and external-hex implant connections.用于内部三通道和外部六角形种植体连接的氧化锆基台和钛基台的适配精度和扭矩保持力比较。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Aug;9(4):271-277. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.4.271. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
2
A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments.比较复制研磨氧化锆和预制钛基台的拟合精度、旋转自由度和扭矩损失。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):996-1002. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2937.
3
Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.带内连接和外连接的种植体基台的窄径氧化锆种植体的抗折强度:钛树脂基台概念的研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Apr;29(4):411-423. doi: 10.1111/clr.13139. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
4
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.老化后支持全瓷冠的氧化锆和钛种植体基台的弯矩
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Jan;25(1):74-81. doi: 10.1111/clr.12192. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
5
Abutment rotational freedom on five implant systems with different internal connections.五种具有不同内部连接的种植体系统上基台的旋转自由度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Mar;129(3):433-439. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.老化和咀嚼模拟后,具有内、外种植体-基台连接的氧化锆和钛基台的弯曲力矩。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02141.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
7
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.
9
Mechanical properties and marginal fit of prefabricated versus customized dental implant abutments: A comparative study.预制与定制牙科种植体基台的机械性能和边缘适合性:一项比较研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Oct;24(5):720-729. doi: 10.1111/cid.13130. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
10
Comparison of fracture resistance and fit accuracy of customized zirconia abutments with prefabricated zirconia abutments in internal hexagonal implants.内六角种植体中定制氧化锆基台与预制氧化锆基台的抗折性和适配精度比较
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Oct;15(5):769-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00426.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of manufacturing methods and use of CoCr-based abutments on vertical and horizontal marginal fit and torque loss in implant-supported prostheses.钴铬基基台的制造方法及使用对种植支持式修复体垂直和水平边缘适合性及扭矩损失的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2025 May 30;33:e20240589. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0589. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of the influence of connection configuration on the implant-abutment interface vertical misfit of original milled titanium and laser-sintered cobalt-chromium abutments.评估连接配置对原始铣削钛基台和激光烧结钴铬基台的种植体-基台界面垂直不匹配的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Jan 22;29(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06093-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections.一项比较外部和内部种植体-基台连接的应变片分析。
Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):206-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000063.
2
A retrospective study of implant-abutment connections on crestal bone level.种植体-基台连接界面在牙槽嵴顶水平的回顾性研究
J Dent Res. 2013 Dec;92(12 Suppl):202S-7S. doi: 10.1177/0022034513510322. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
3
A comparison of precision of fit, rotational freedom, and torque loss with copy-milled zirconia and prefabricated titanium abutments.
Fracture resistance and marginal fit of three different overlay designs using advanced zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate CAD/CAM material.
使用先进的氧化锆增强二硅酸锂CAD/CAM材料的三种不同覆盖设计的抗折性和边缘适合性。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 4;25(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05315-1.
4
Evaluation of customized cobalt-chromium abutments fabricated with different manufacturing process versus titanium stock abutments on the marginal misfit -An study.不同制作工艺的定制钴铬合金基台与钛基台边缘适合性的比较——一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jul-Sep;22(3):225-232. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_381_21.
5
Effect of Fabrication Technique on the Microgap of CAD/CAM Cobalt-Chrome and Zirconia Abutments on a Conical Connection Implant: An In Vitro Study.制作技术对锥形连接种植体上CAD/CAM钴铬合金和氧化锆基台微间隙的影响:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;14(9):2348. doi: 10.3390/ma14092348.
6
Evaluation of Milled Titanium versus Laser Sintered Co-Cr Abutments on the Marginal Misfit in Internal Implant-Abutment Connection.评估铣削钛基台与激光烧结钴铬基台在种植体-基台内部连接的边缘适合性方面的差异。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Oct 30;13(21):4873. doi: 10.3390/ma13214873.
7
Influence of Implant Connection, Abutment Design and Screw Insertion Torque on Implant-Abutment Misfit.种植体连接、基台设计及螺钉旋入扭矩对种植体-基台不匹配的影响
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 24;9(8):2365. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082365.
8
Hybrid-abutment-restoration: effect of material type on torque maintenance and fracture resistance after thermal aging.混合基台修复体:热老化后材料类型对扭矩维持和抗折性的影响。
Int J Implant Dent. 2020 Jun 24;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40729-020-00220-y.
9
Sealing capability and marginal fit of titanium versus zirconia abutments with different connection designs.不同连接设计的钛基台与氧化锆基台的封闭能力和边缘适合性。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;11(2):105-111. doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.105. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
10
An evaluation of superhydrophilic surfaces of dental implants - a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估牙科种植体的超亲水表面 - 系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 10;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0767-8.
比较复制研磨氧化锆和预制钛基台的拟合精度、旋转自由度和扭矩损失。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jul-Aug;28(4):996-1002. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2937.
4
Influence of bone insertion level of the implant on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study.种植体骨内植入水平对不同连接设计骨折强度的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1039-7. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections.不同种植体/基台连接的种植体支持的前牙冠的机械测试。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Jan-Feb;28(1):103-8. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2443.
6
Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.基台/修复体的内连接与外连接:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.
7
Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study.种植体颈部设计及种植体-基台连接类型对种植体周围健康的影响。影像学研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1192-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02562.x. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
8
Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.氧化锆和钛基台与内部种植体-基台连接的弯曲力矩和失效类型:一项实验室研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):505-12.
9
Comparison of fracture resistance and fit accuracy of customized zirconia abutments with prefabricated zirconia abutments in internal hexagonal implants.内六角种植体中定制氧化锆基台与预制氧化锆基台的抗折性和适配精度比较
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Oct;15(5):769-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00426.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
10
Photoelastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections.外连接与内连接种植体-基台的光弹应力分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Oct;106(4):266-71. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60128-5.