Suppr超能文献

肯尼亚卫生系统中临床官员的作用:视角问题。

The role of Clinical Officers in the Kenyan health system: a question of perspective.

机构信息

Kenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Geographic Medical Research Coast-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme, P, O, Box 43640-00100 GPO, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2013 Jul 17;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-32.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing interest in using non-physician clinicians in many low-income countries, little is known about the roles they play in typical health system settings. Prior research has concentrated on evaluating their technical competencies compared to those of doctors. This work explored perceptions of the roles of Kenyan non-physician clinicians (Clinical Officers (COs).

METHODS

Qualitative methods including in-depth interviews (with COs, nurses, doctors, hospital management, and policymakers, among others), participant observation and document analysis were used. A nomothetic-idiographic framework was used to examine tensions between institutions and individuals within them. A comparative approach was used to examine institutional versus individual notions of CO roles, how these roles play out in government and faith-based hospital (FBH) settings as well as differences arising from three specific work settings for COs within hospitals.

RESULTS

The main finding was the discrepancy between policy documents that outline a broad role for COs that covers both technical and managerial roles, while respondents articulated a narrow technical role that focused on patient care and management. Respondents described a variety of images of COs, ranging from 'filter' to 'primary healthcare physician', when asked about CO roles. COs argued for a defined role associated with primary healthcare, feeling constrained by their technical role. FBH settings were found to additionally clarify CO roles when compared with public hospitals. Tensions between formal prescriptions of CO roles and actual practice were reported and coalesced around lack of recognition over COs work, role conflict among specialist COs, and role ambiguity.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though COs are important service providers their role is not clearly understood, which has resulted in role conflict. It is suggested that their role be redefined, moving from that of 'substitute clinician' to professional 'primary care clinician', with this being supported by the health system.

摘要

背景

尽管许多低收入国家越来越关注使用非医师临床医生,但他们在典型卫生系统环境中所扮演的角色却知之甚少。先前的研究主要集中在评估他们的技术能力与医生相比如何。这项工作探讨了肯尼亚非医师临床医生(临床医生(COs)的角色看法。

方法

采用定性方法,包括深入访谈(与 COs、护士、医生、医院管理人员和政策制定者等)、参与观察和文件分析。使用唯名论-唯实论框架来考察机构内部的机构和个人之间的紧张关系。采用比较方法来考察机构与个人对 CO 角色的看法,以及这些角色在政府和基于信仰的医院(FBH)中的表现,以及 COs 在医院内三个特定工作环境中产生的差异。

结果

主要发现是政策文件与受访者之间存在差异,政策文件概述了 CO 的广泛角色,涵盖技术和管理角色,而受访者则表达了狭隘的技术角色,侧重于患者护理和管理。当被问及 CO 角色时,受访者描述了 CO 的各种形象,从“过滤器”到“初级保健医生”不等。COs 主张与初级保健相关的明确角色,感到受到其技术角色的限制。与公立医院相比,FBH 环境被发现进一步澄清了 CO 的角色。正式规定的 CO 角色与实际做法之间的紧张关系报告并集中在 CO 工作缺乏认可、专科 CO 之间的角色冲突以及角色模糊。

结论

尽管 COs 是重要的服务提供者,但他们的角色并不明确,这导致了角色冲突。建议重新定义他们的角色,从“替代临床医生”转变为专业的“初级保健临床医生”,这得到了卫生系统的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f9/3724708/1111c940b653/1478-4491-11-32-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验