Floccia Caroline, Nazzi Thierry, Delle Luche Claire, Poltrock Silvana, Goslin Jeremy
University of Plymouth,UK.
University Paris Descartes,France.
J Child Lang. 2014 Sep;41(5):1085-114. doi: 10.1017/S0305000913000287. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Following the proposal that consonants are more involved than vowels in coding the lexicon (Nespor, Peña & Mehler, 2003), an early lexical consonant bias was found from age 1;2 in French but an equal sensitivity to consonants and vowels from 1;0 to 2;0 in English. As different tasks were used in French and English, we sought to clarify this ambiguity by using an interactive word-learning study similar to that used in French, with British-English-learning toddlers aged 1;4 and 1;11. Children were taught two CVC labels differing on either a consonant or vowel and tested on their pairing of a third object named with one of the previously taught labels, or part of them. In concert with previous research on British-English toddlers, our results provided no evidence of a general consonant bias. The language-specific mechanisms explaining the differential status for consonants and vowels in lexical development are discussed.
根据关于在词汇编码中辅音比元音参与度更高的提议(内斯波尔、佩尼亚和梅勒,2003年),在法语中从1岁2个月起就发现了早期的词汇辅音偏向,但在英语中从1岁到2岁对辅音和元音的敏感度相同。由于法语和英语使用了不同的任务,我们试图通过使用一项类似于法语中使用的互动式单词学习研究来澄清这种模糊性,该研究针对的是年龄为1岁4个月和1岁11个月的学习英式英语的幼儿。教给孩子们两个在辅音或元音上不同的CVC标签,并测试他们将第三个物体与之前教过的标签之一或其中一部分进行配对的能力。与之前对英式英语幼儿的研究一致,我们的结果没有提供普遍辅音偏向的证据。讨论了解释词汇发展中辅音和元音不同地位的特定语言机制。