HRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School, Dublin, Ireland.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 18;3(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002929. Print 2013.
The aim of this systematic review was to examine the epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care.
A computerised systematic literature search was conducted. Studies were included if they reported original data (≥10 cases) pertinent to malpractice claims, were based in primary care and were published in the English language. Data were synthesised using a narrative approach.
Primary care.
Malpractice claimants.
Malpractice claim (defined as a written demand for compensation for medical injury). We recorded: medical misadventure cited in claims, missed/delayed diagnoses cited in claims, outcome of claims, prevalence of claims and compensation awarded to claimants.
Of the 7152 articles retrieved by electronic search, a total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the narrative analysis. Twenty-eight studies presented data from medical indemnity malpractice claims databases and six studies presented survey data. Fifteen studies were based in the USA, nine in the UK, seven in Australia, one in Canada and two in France. The commonest medical misadventure resulting in claims was failure to or delay in diagnosis, which represented 26-63% of all claims across included studies. Common missed or delayed diagnoses included cancer and myocardial infarction in adults and meningitis in children. Medication error represented the second commonest domain representing 5.6-20% of all claims across included studies. The prevalence of malpractice claims in primary care varied across countries. In the USA and Australia when compared with other clinical disciplines, general practice ranked in the top five specialties accounting for the most claims, representing 7.6-20% of all claims. However, the majority of claims were successfully defended.
This review of malpractice claims in primary care highlights diagnosis and medication error as areas to be prioritised in developing educational strategies and risk management systems.
本系统评价旨在研究初级保健中医疗事故索赔的流行病学。
计算机系统地进行文献检索。如果报告的原始数据(≥10 例)与医疗事故索赔有关、基于初级保健且用英文发表,则纳入研究。使用叙述性方法综合数据。
初级保健。
医疗事故索赔人。
医疗事故索赔(定义为因医疗伤害而提出的书面赔偿要求)。我们记录了索赔中引用的医疗事故、索赔中引用的漏诊/误诊、索赔的结果、索赔的发生率和判给索赔人的赔偿金。
通过电子搜索检索到的 7152 篇文章中,共有 34 项研究符合纳入标准,并纳入叙述性分析。28 项研究基于医疗赔偿医疗事故索赔数据库,6 项研究基于调查数据。15 项研究基于美国,9 项研究基于英国,7 项研究基于澳大利亚,1 项研究基于加拿大,2 项研究基于法国。导致索赔的最常见医疗事故是漏诊或延迟诊断,在纳入研究中占所有索赔的 26-63%。常见的漏诊或误诊包括成人的癌症和心肌梗死以及儿童的脑膜炎。药物错误占纳入研究中所有索赔的 5.6-20%,代表第二个最常见的领域。初级保健中医疗事故索赔的发生率因国家而异。在美国和澳大利亚,与其他临床学科相比,全科医学在报告的最多索赔的五个专科中排名前五,占所有索赔的 7.6-20%。然而,大多数索赔都得到了成功辩护。
本综述强调诊断和药物错误是制定教育策略和风险管理系统的优先领域。