• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纳米比亚临终关怀的公共优先事项与偏好。

Public priorities and preferences for end-of-life care in Namibia.

作者信息

Powell Richard A, Namisango Eve, Gikaara Nancy, Moyo Sherperd, Mwangi-Powell Faith N, Gomes Barbara, Harding Richard

机构信息

HealthCare Chaplaincy, New York, New York, USA; African Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.

African Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Mar;47(3):620-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.04.004
PMID:23870841
Abstract

CONTEXT

Although quality end-of-life care provision is an international public health issue, the majority of evidence is not generated in low- and middle-income countries that bear a disproportionate burden of progressive illnesses.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the priorities and preferences of the Namibian public for end-of-life care.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional study design, data were collected in the country's capital, Windhoek, from November to December 2010.

RESULTS

In total, 200 respondents were recruited. The mean age was 27 years (SD 7.5; range 18-69), with nearly all (n = 199; 99.5%) expressing a religious affiliation. Being in pain was reported as the most concerning of nine common end-of-life symptoms and problems (n = 52; 26.1%), and the most important care-related aspect was having as much information as wanted (n = 144; 72%). The majority (64%) would want their end-of-life care to focus on improving their quality of life rather than extending it, with 40% not wanting to know if they had limited time left to live. Hospital (n = 96; 48%) and home (n = 64; 32%) were the most preferred places of death. The most important end-of-life priority was keeping a positive attitude (n = 128; 64%). Having had a close relative or friend diagnosed with a serious illness was associated with a 2.3 increase in the odds of preference for a hospital death (odds ratio = 2.34, P = 0.009, 95% CI 1.23-4.47).

CONCLUSION

This study identified a number of areas that need to be pursued in future research to explore factors that may affect patient preferences and priorities in end-of-life care in Namibia.

摘要

背景

尽管优质的临终关怀是一个国际公共卫生问题,但大多数证据并非来自那些承受着不成比例的渐进性疾病负担的低收入和中等收入国家。

目的

确定纳米比亚公众对临终关怀的优先事项和偏好。

方法

采用横断面研究设计,于2010年11月至12月在该国首都温得和克收集数据。

结果

共招募了200名受访者。平均年龄为27岁(标准差7.5;范围18 - 69岁),几乎所有人(n = 199;99.5%)都表示有宗教信仰。在九种常见的临终症状和问题中,疼痛被报告为最令人担忧的问题(n = 52;26.1%),与护理相关的最重要方面是获得所需的尽可能多的信息(n = 144;72%)。大多数人(64%)希望他们的临终关怀重点是提高生活质量而非延长生命,40%的人不想知道自己是否所剩时间有限。医院(n = 96;48%)和家中(n = 64;32%)是最希望的死亡地点。临终最重要的优先事项是保持积极的态度(n = 128;64%)。有近亲或朋友被诊断患有严重疾病与选择在医院死亡的几率增加2.3倍相关(优势比 = 2.34,P = 0.009,95%置信区间1.23 - 4.47)。

结论

本研究确定了一些未来研究需要探讨的领域,以探索可能影响纳米比亚临终关怀患者偏好和优先事项的因素。

相似文献

1
Public priorities and preferences for end-of-life care in Namibia.纳米比亚临终关怀的公共优先事项与偏好。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Mar;47(3):620-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
2
Priorities for treatment, care and information if faced with serious illness: a comparative population-based survey in seven European countries.面对严重疾病时的治疗、护理及信息获取优先事项:一项在七个欧洲国家开展的基于人群的比较性调查
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):101-10. doi: 10.1177/0269216313488989. Epub 2013 May 23.
3
End-of-life care and achieving preferences for place of death in England: results of a population-based survey using the VOICES-SF questionnaire.英国的临终关怀与实现死亡地点偏好:使用VOICES-SF问卷进行的基于人群调查结果
Palliat Med. 2014 May;28(5):412-21. doi: 10.1177/0269216313512012. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
4
Japanese people's preference for place of end-of-life care and death: a population-based nationwide survey.日本人对临终关怀和死亡地点的偏好:一项基于人群的全国性调查。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Dec;42(6):882-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.024.
5
Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries.将养老院选为最不愿离世的场所:一项对七个欧洲国家公众偏好的跨国调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2014 Oct 23;13:48. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-48.
6
Public opinion on preferences and priorities for end-of-life care in sub-Saharan Africa: piloting a novel method of street surveying.撒哈拉以南非洲地区关于临终关怀偏好和优先事项的公众舆论:试行一种新型街头调查方法
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012 Mar;2(1):72-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000112. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
7
[What influences end-of-life decisions? Results of a representative German survey].[哪些因素影响临终决策?一项德国代表性调查的结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Oct;58(10):1118-23. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2219-1.
8
Information preferences of the general population when faced with life-limiting illness.普通人群面对危及生命疾病时的信息偏好
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Jun;25(3):532-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku158. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
9
Parents' perspective on symptoms, quality of life, characteristics of death and end-of-life decisions for children dying from cancer.父母对患癌濒死儿童的症状、生活质量、死亡特征及临终决策的看法。
Klin Padiatr. 2008 May-Jun;220(3):166-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1065347.
10
[Age differences in decision-making factors on end-of-life care location for Musashino-city residents].[武藏野市居民临终关怀地点决策因素的年龄差异]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2014;61(9):545-55.

引用本文的文献

1
EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood.EOLinPLACE:一项旨在改革临终场所分类和理解方式的国际研究项目。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Feb 12;18:26323524231222498. doi: 10.1177/26323524231222498. eCollection 2024.
2
Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study.加拿大人更愿意在哪里去世?一项全国性研究显示,这取决于情境严重程度、对家庭义务的支持程度和年龄的变化。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Aug 1;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01023-1.
3
Approaches to integrating palliative care into African health systems: a qualitative systematic review.
将姑息治疗纳入非洲卫生系统的方法:一项定性系统评价
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Oct 1;35(8):1053-1069. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa026.
4
Prediction of life-story narrative for end-of-life surrogate's decision-making is inadequate: a Q-methodology study.预测临终替代决策的生活故事叙述是不充分的:一项 Q 方法论研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 3;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0368-8.
5
A Prospective Cohort Study of Factors Associated With Place of Death Among Patients With Late-Stage Cancer in Southern Africa.一项在南非开展的与晚期癌症患者死亡地点相关因素的前瞻性队列研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):923-932. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Place of death for people with HIV: a population-level comparison of eleven countries across three continents using death certificate data.艾滋病毒感染者的死亡地点:使用死亡证明数据对三大洲十一个国家进行的人群水平比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 25;18(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-2951-x.
7
Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology.沙特女性临终优先事项的类型学:平均分析与Q方法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 May 17;10:781-94. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S105578. eCollection 2016.
8
Exploring end of life priorities in Saudi males: usefulness of Q-methodology.探索沙特男性临终时的优先事项:Q方法的效用
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Nov 26;14:66. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0064-5.
9
Telemedicine's Potential to Support Good Dying in Nigeria: A Qualitative Study.远程医疗对尼日利亚善终支持的潜力:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0126820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126820. eCollection 2015.