文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影加腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆总管结石的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

机构信息

Department of HPB Surgery, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, Darülaceze Cad. No: 25 Okmeydanı - Şişli/İstanbul 34384, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2013 Oct;206(4):457-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Jul 17.


DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.02.004
PMID:23871320
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration are safe and efficient methods that have recently been used for the treatment of bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and surgical outcomes of the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCBDE+LC) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+LC). METHODS: One hundred twenty patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: LCBDE with LC in a single intervention and LC after ERCP. RESULTS: The success rate of the LCBDE+LC group (96.5%) was found to be higher than for the ERCP+LC group (94.4%). Complication rates of the LCBDE+LC and ERCP+LC group were 7% and 11.1%, respectively. Complications requiring ERCP in the postoperative period after LCBDE+LC have been noted in 3.5% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CBD exploration provides an alternative therapeutic approach that has less morbidity, is cost-effective, and allows earlier recovery with a reduced period of short-term disability.

摘要

背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术和腹腔镜胆总管探查术是最近用于治疗胆管结石的安全有效的方法。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术加腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LCBDE+LC)和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术加腹腔镜胆囊切除术(ERCP+LC)的疗效、安全性和手术结果。

方法:120 例患者前瞻性随机分为 2 组:单干预腹腔镜胆总管探查术加腹腔镜胆囊切除术和 ERCP 后腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

结果:LCBDE+LC 组的成功率(96.5%)高于 ERCP+LC 组(94.4%)。LCBDE+LC 组和 ERCP+LC 组的并发症发生率分别为 7%和 11.1%。LCBDE+LC 术后需要 ERCP 的并发症发生率为 3.5%。

结论:腹腔镜 CBD 探查术提供了一种替代治疗方法,具有较低的发病率、成本效益高,并允许早期恢复,缩短短期残疾期。

相似文献

[1]
Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study.

Am J Surg. 2013-7-17

[2]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2018-12-3

[3]
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.

Surg Endosc. 2021-3

[4]
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.

Int J Surg. 2009-8

[5]
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-9-3

[6]
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-12-12

[7]
Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease.

Arch Surg. 2010-1

[8]
Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus cholecystectomy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients with common bile duct stones and gallbladder stones.

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024-5

[9]
Outcome of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Comparative Study.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019-11

[10]
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Concomitant Gall Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Study.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Textbook outcomes in the laparoscopic common bile duct exploration of choledocholithiasis: a new comprehensive quality evaluation criterion.

Front Surg. 2025-8-14

[2]
Is the Success Rate of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) ± Sphincterotomy Done for Bile Duct Stones Optimal?

Dig Dis Sci. 2025-8-29

[3]
Breaking age barriers: the efficacy of ERCP in advanced age patients.

BMC Surg. 2025-8-6

[4]
Research progress in the treatment of gallstones with laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery: a narrative review.

BMC Surg. 2025-5-29

[5]
Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-4-27

[6]
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endoscopic management followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy of preoperatively diagnosed common bile duct stones.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-3-14

[7]
Post-ERCP clearance of bile duct stones: should the gallbladder be left in-situ?

Surg Endosc. 2025-3

[8]
The efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary duct closure for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.

Clin Case Rep. 2024-9-4

[9]
Changes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: 1980 to Date.

Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2024-4-28

[10]
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023-9-8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索