Suppr超能文献

自体荧光成像支气管镜检查与白光支气管镜检查在肺癌及癌前病变检测中的比较

Comparison of autofluorescence imaging bronchoscopy and white light bronchoscopy for detection of lung cancers and precancerous lesions.

作者信息

Wang Yan, Wang Qing, Feng Jing, Wu Qi

机构信息

Respiratory Department of Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jul 5;7:621-31. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S46749. Print 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this paper was to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic performance of autofluorescence imaging bronchoscopy (AFI) versus white light bronchoscopy (WLB) in the detection of lung cancers and precancerous lesions by meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using the PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify studies published between March 1991 and March 2012. Article selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were then performed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic for AFI versus WLB were calculated using Stata version 12.0 software.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of AFI and WLB was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-0.94) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.46-0.83) and the pooled specificity of AFI and WLB was 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-0.84) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.74-0.91), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio for AFI and WLB was 14.5 (95% CI 3.76-55.63) and 10.9 (95% CI 3.12-38.21), and the area under the curve for AFI and WLB was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.88), respectively. The pooled positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.5 (95% CI 1.21-4.97) and 0.17 (95% CI 0.08-0.36) for AFI, and the corresponding values for WLB were 4.3 (95% CI 2.13-8.52) and 0.39 (95% CI 0.21-0.73). The pooled positive likelihood ratio for AFI and WLB was not higher than 10, and the pooled negative likelihood ratio for AFI and WLB was not lower than 0.1.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of AFI is higher than that of WLB, while the specificity of AFI is lower than that of WLB. The overall diagnostic performance of AFI is slightly better than that of WLB in detecting lung cancers and precancerous lesions. AFI should find its place in routine bronchoscopic examination and may improve the diagnostic outcome on endoscopy.

摘要

背景

本文旨在通过荟萃分析比较自体荧光成像支气管镜检查(AFI)与白光支气管镜检查(WLB)在肺癌及癌前病变检测中的敏感性、特异性及总体诊断性能。

方法

我们使用PubMed和EMBASE数据库进行文献检索,以确定1991年3月至2012年3月间发表的研究。随后进行文章筛选、质量评估及数据提取。使用Stata 12.0软件计算AFI与WLB的合并敏感性、特异性、诊断比值比及汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积。

结果

六项研究纳入荟萃分析。AFI与WLB的合并敏感性分别为0.89(95%置信区间[CI] 0.81 - 0.94)和0.67(95% CI 0.46 - 0.83),合并特异性分别为0.64(95% CI 0.37 - 0.84)和0.84(95% CI 0.74 - 0.91)。AFI与WLB的诊断比值比分别为14.5(95% CI 3.76 - 55.63)和10.9(95% CI 3.12 - 38.21),AFI与WLB的曲线下面积分别为0.89(95% CI 0.86 - 0.92)和0.85(95% CI 0.81 - 0.88)。AFI的合并阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为2.5(95% CI 1.21 - 4.97)和0.17(95% CI 0.08 - 0.36),WLB的相应值分别为4.3(95% CI 2.13 - 8.52)和0.39(95% CI 0.21 - 0.73)。AFI与WLB的合并阳性似然比不高于10,合并阴性似然比不低于0.1。

结论

AFI的敏感性高于WLB,而AFI的特异性低于WLB。在肺癌及癌前病变检测中,AFI的总体诊断性能略优于WLB。AFI应在常规支气管镜检查中占有一席之地,并可能改善内镜检查的诊断结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b684/3711948/5f4bfae38ce4/ppa-7-621Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验