Suppr超能文献

特发性扩张型心肌病和慢性心房颤动。

Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and chronic atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Tuomainen Petri O, Magga Jarkko, Fedacko Jan, Kärkkäinen Satu, Miettinen Kati, Vanninen Esko, Kuusisto Johanna, Peuhkurinen Keijo J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Heart Center, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Mar;34(2):133-7. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12075. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). We explored the clinical characteristics of IDC patients with chronic AF compared with those with sinus rhythm (SR).

METHODS

A group of patients with IDC underwent extensive non-invasive and invasive evaluation during a hospitalization period. The patients were further divided into two groups with AF (n = 19) and SR (n = 68).

RESULTS

Left atrial diameter was greater (P<0·001), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter smaller (P<0·05), left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes smaller (P<0·01 for all), mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure higher (P<0·05 for both), cardiac output and maximal oxygen consumption lower (P<0·01 and P<0·05, respectively), and the levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and interleukin-6 higher (P<0·05 for both) in AF group compared with SR group. Left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of otherwise more unfavourable prognostic factor profile, left ventricular size was observed to be smaller in chronic AF compared with SR in well-characterized patients with IDC. The confirmation and possible explainers of this paradoxical phenomenon need further studies in larger patient cohorts.

摘要

背景

心房颤动(AF)在特发性扩张型心肌病(IDC)中很常见。我们探讨了慢性房颤的IDC患者与窦性心律(SR)患者相比的临床特征。

方法

一组IDC患者在住院期间接受了广泛的非侵入性和侵入性评估。患者进一步分为房颤组(n = 19)和窦性心律组(n = 68)。

结果

与窦性心律组相比,房颤组的左心房直径更大(P<0.001),左心室舒张末期直径更小(P<0.05),左心室舒张末期和收缩末期容积更小(均P<0.01),平均肺动脉压和肺毛细血管楔压更高(均P<0.05),心输出量和最大耗氧量更低(分别为P<0.01和P<0.05),N末端脑钠肽前体和白细胞介素-6水平更高(均P<0.05)。两组的左心室射血分数和左心室舒张末期压力相似。

结论

在特征明确的IDC患者中,尽管慢性房颤患者存在更多不利的预后因素,但观察到其左心室大小比窦性心律患者更小。这一矛盾现象的证实及其可能的解释因素需要在更大的患者队列中进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验