Center for Neuroscience and Society, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1397-405. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00407. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
Brain scans have frequently been credited with uniquely seductive and persuasive qualities, leading to claims that fMRI research receives a disproportionate share of public attention and funding. It has been suggested that functional brain images are fascinating because they contradict dualist beliefs regarding the relationship between the body and the mind. Although previous research has indicated that brain images can increase judgments of an article's scientific reasoning, the hypotheses that brain scans make research appear more interesting, surprising, or worthy of funding have not been tested. Neither has the relation between the allure of brain imaging and dualism. In the following three studies, laypersons rated both fictional research descriptions and real science news articles accompanied by brain scans, bar charts, or photographs. Across 988 participants, we found little evidence of neuroimaging's seductive allure or of its relation to self-professed dualistic beliefs. These results, taken together with other recent null findings, suggest that brain images are less powerful than has been argued.
脑扫描常被认为具有独特的诱人特质和说服力,导致有人声称 fMRI 研究获得了不成比例的公众关注和资金。有人认为,功能性脑图像之所以吸引人,是因为它们与身心关系的二元论观点相悖。尽管先前的研究表明,脑图像可以增加对文章科学推理的判断,但尚未检验脑扫描是否会使研究看起来更有趣、更令人惊讶或更值得资助的假设,也没有检验脑成像的吸引力与二元论之间的关系。在接下来的三项研究中,非专业人士对带有脑扫描、柱状图或照片的虚构研究描述和真实科学新闻文章进行了评价。在 988 名参与者中,我们几乎没有发现神经影像学的诱人魅力或其与自称的二元论信仰之间的关系的证据。这些结果与其他最近的无效发现一起表明,脑图像的影响力比人们认为的要小。