Im Soo-Hyun, Cho Joo-Yun, Dubinsky Janet M, Varma Sashank
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America.
Department of Elementary Education, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0192163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192163. eCollection 2018.
Educators are increasingly interested in applying neuroscience findings to improve educational practice. However, their understanding of the brain often lags behind their enthusiasm for the brain. We propose that educational psychology can serve as a bridge between basic research in neuroscience and psychology on one hand and educational practice on the other. We evaluated whether taking an educational psychology course is associated with increased neuroscience literacy and reduced belief in neuromyths in a sample of South Korean pre-service teachers. The results showed that taking an educational psychology course was associated with the increased neuroscience literacy, but there was no impact on belief in neuromyths. We consider the implications of these and other findings of the study for redesigning educational psychology courses and textbooks for improving neuroscience literacy.
教育工作者越来越有兴趣应用神经科学研究成果来改进教育实践。然而,他们对大脑的理解往往落后于他们对大脑的热情。我们认为,教育心理学可以在神经科学与心理学的基础研究和教育实践之间架起一座桥梁。我们在韩国职前教师样本中评估了修读教育心理学课程是否与神经科学素养的提高以及对神经神话的信念减少有关。结果表明,修读教育心理学课程与神经科学素养的提高有关,但对神经神话的信念没有影响。我们考虑了该研究的这些及其他发现对重新设计教育心理学课程和教科书以提高神经科学素养的意义。