Suppr超能文献

术前因素预测腹腔镜胆总管切开术后不良结局:多因素分析研究。

Preoperative factors predicting poor outcomes following laparoscopic choledochotomy: a multivariate analysis study.

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yinzhou Second Hospital, Ningbo, China.

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2013 Aug;56(4):227-32. doi: 10.1503/cjs.003112.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic surgery for common bile duct stones varies procedurally from a transcystic approach to laparoscopic choledochotomy (LC) with or without biliary drainage. However, LC is a difficult procedure with higher documented morbidity than the transcystic approach. We retrospectively investigated risk factors for adverse outcomes of LC.

METHODS

We used logistic regression models to assess 4 categories of adverse outcomes: overall, complications, conversion to open operation and failed surgical clearance. We calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

We included 201 patients who underwent LC in our analysis. Adverse outcomes occurred in 48 (23.9%) patients, complications occurred in 43 (21.4%), retained stones were observed in 8 (4%), and conversion to laparotomy occurred in 7 (3.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that total bilirubin (BIL) and the presence of medical risk factors (MRFs) were significant predictors of adverse outcomes and complications. We calculated the probability of adverse outcomes (p) using the following formula: logit(p) = 0.977 (MRFs) + 0.014 (BIL) - 2.919. p = EXP (logit(p)) ÷ [1+EXP (logit(p))]. According to their logit(p), all patients were divided into a low-risk group (logit(p) ≤ -1.32, n = 130) and a high-risk group (logit(p) > -1.32, n = 71). Patients in the low-risk group had about a 1 in 10 chance (12 of 130) of adverse outcomes developing. Of the 71 patients in the high-risk group, 36 (50.7%) experienced adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

High BIL and the presence of MRFs could predict adverse outcomes in patients undergoing LC.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胆总管切开取石术(LC)的手术方式因经胆囊管途径或 LC 联合或不联合胆道引流而有所不同。然而,LC 是一种较为困难的手术,其并发症发生率高于经胆囊管途径。本研究回顾性分析了 LC 不良结局的危险因素。

方法

我们使用逻辑回归模型评估了 4 类不良结局:总体不良结局、并发症、中转开腹手术和手术未清除结石。我们计算了受试者工作特征曲线下面积以评估诊断准确性。

结果

我们纳入了 201 例行 LC 的患者。48 例(23.9%)患者出现不良结局,43 例(21.4%)患者发生并发症,8 例(4%)患者留有结石,7 例(3.5%)患者中转开腹手术。多变量分析显示,总胆红素(BIL)和存在医疗风险因素(MRFs)是不良结局和并发症的显著预测因素。我们使用以下公式计算不良结局的概率(p):logit(p) = 0.977(MRFs)+ 0.014(BIL)-2.919。p = EXP(logit(p))÷[1+EXP(logit(p))]。根据其 logit(p)值,所有患者被分为低风险组(logit(p)≤-1.32,n = 130)和高风险组(logit(p)>-1.32,n = 71)。低风险组患者发生不良结局的概率约为 1/10(130 例中有 12 例)。高风险组患者中,有 36 例(50.7%)发生不良结局。

结论

高 BIL 和存在 MRFs 可以预测 LC 患者的不良结局。

相似文献

3
Primary duct closure combined with transcystic drainage versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy.
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Jul;89(7-8):885-888. doi: 10.1111/ans.15163. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 3(9):CD003327. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3.
5
A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):130-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1146-3. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
6
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
7
[Transcystic biliary drainage versus nasobiliary drainage during primary closure of the laparoscopic choledochotomy].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 1;56(2):130-134. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.02.010.
10
Laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with flexible choledochoscopy.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Dec;21(12):2317-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9577-1. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is preferred for selected elderly individuals with choledocholithiasis.
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Mar 6;7(5):772-783. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12668. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Single-stage procedure for the treatment of cholecysto-choledocolithiasis: a surgical procedures review.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Feb 20;14:305-312. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S146461. eCollection 2018.
4
Identifying predictors of a difficult thyroidectomy.
J Surg Res. 2014 Jul;190(1):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.034. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

2
A study of preoperative factors associated with a poor outcome following laparoscopic bile duct exploration.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):130-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1146-3. Epub 2010 Jun 22.
3
Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):172-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1152-5. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
4
Preoperative biliary drainage in patients with obstructive jaundice: history and current status.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Apr;13(4):814-20. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0618-4. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
5
Preoperative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD005444. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005444.pub2.
6
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.
Ann Surg. 2008 Apr;247(4):674-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181612c85.
7
Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS).
Gut. 2008 Jul;57(7):1004-21. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.121657. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
8
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration after failed endoscopic stone extraction.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Aug;22(8):1826-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9708-8. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
9
Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1970-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9387-5. Epub 2007 May 24.
10
Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones.
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):889-93; discussion 893-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246913.74870.fc.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验