• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与发育障碍相关的网站质量比较。

Quality comparison of websites related to developmental disabilities.

机构信息

A.J. Pappanikou Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3077-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.013
PMID:23891722
Abstract

The Internet is commonly used to seek health-related information, but little is known about the quality of websites on developmental disabilities. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the characteristics and quality of websites located by searching ten common terms related to developmental disabilities and explore relations between website characteristics and website quality in order to make recommendations on ways to ensure locating good online information. We located 208 unique websites in our November 2012 US searches of Google and Bing. Two independent coders evaluated 10 characteristics of the websites and two different coders assessed the quality of the websites. From the 208 websites, 104 (50%) provided relevant information about the disability being searched. Of these 104 websites, those found to be of highest quality were least likely to be a sponsored result, contain advertisements, be from a for-profit company, and did contain references to peer-reviewed publications or had a top-level domain of .gov or .org. Individuals with developmental disabilities and their family members who choose to obtain disability-related information online should remain vigilant to ensure that they locate high-quality and accurate information and should not replace information obtained from health-care professionals and educational specialists with information found online.

摘要

互联网通常被用于搜索与健康相关的信息,但对于发育障碍相关网站的质量,人们知之甚少。因此,我们试图通过搜索与发育障碍相关的十个常见术语来评估网站的特征和质量,并探讨网站特征与网站质量之间的关系,以便就如何确保找到优质在线信息提出建议。我们在 2012 年 11 月对谷歌和必应进行了美国搜索,找到了 208 个独特的网站。两名独立的编码员评估了网站的 10 个特征,两名不同的编码员评估了网站的质量。在这 208 个网站中,有 104 个(50%)提供了与正在搜索的残疾相关的信息。在这 104 个网站中,质量最高的网站最不可能是赞助结果,含有广告,来自营利性公司,并且确实包含对同行评议出版物的引用,或者顶级域为.gov 或.org。选择通过互联网获取残疾相关信息的发育障碍患者及其家属应保持警惕,以确保他们找到高质量和准确的信息,并且不应将从医疗保健专业人员和教育专家那里获得的信息与从互联网上找到的信息相替代。

相似文献

1
Quality comparison of websites related to developmental disabilities.与发育障碍相关的网站质量比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3077-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
2
Characteristics of international websites with information on developmental disabilities.提供发育障碍相关信息的国际网站的特点。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Oct;35(10):2293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
3
Googling Self-injury: the state of health information obtained through online searches for self-injury.谷歌搜索自伤:通过在线搜索自伤获取的健康信息状况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 May;168(5):443-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.187.
4
Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia.互联网搜索词会影响有关发育性髋关节发育不良的在线信息的质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jun;33(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd2.
5
Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.网站以及谷歌搜索中关于人类健康和食品信息的语言偏好。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jun 28;9(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e18.
6
Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability.互联网上以患者为导向的甲氨蝶呤信息网站:完整性、准确性、格式、可靠性、可信度和可读性综述
J Rheumatol. 2009 Jan;36(1):41-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080430.
7
[Quality of health information about epilepsy on the Internet: Evaluation of French websites].[互联网上有关癫痫的健康信息质量:法国网站评估]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Mar;169(3):234-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
8
Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine.通过互联网搜索引擎获取的患者脊柱教育的可变性。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Mar;118:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
9
Quality and readability of English-language internet information for adults with hearing impairment and their significant others.听力障碍成年人及其重要他人可获取的英文网络信息的质量和可读性。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Aug;51(8):618-26. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.684406. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
10
Evaluating the quality of websites offering information on female hypoactive sexual desire disorder.评估提供女性性欲减退障碍信息的网站质量。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2007 Jul-Sep;33(4):329-42. doi: 10.1080/00926230701385555.

引用本文的文献

1
How online ADHD-related information affects Chinese parents' decisions?线上 ADHD 相关信息如何影响中国家长的决策?
World J Pediatr. 2019 Feb;15(1):57-65. doi: 10.1007/s12519-018-0207-x. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
Seeking Web-Based Information About Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Where, What, and When.寻找关于注意力缺陷多动障碍的网络信息:何处、何物及何时。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 21;19(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6579.
3
Infant Feeding Websites and Apps: A Systematic Assessment of Quality and Content.婴儿喂养网站与应用程序:质量与内容的系统评估
Interact J Med Res. 2015 Sep 29;4(3):e18. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4323.
4
[Evaluation of the quality of the information available on the Internet regarding dentistry and Down syndrome].[关于牙科与唐氏综合征的互联网可用信息质量评估]
Aten Primaria. 2016 Feb;48(2):139-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
The internet as a source of information for De Quervain's tendinitis.互联网作为桡骨茎突狭窄性腱鞘炎信息的来源。
Hand (N Y). 2015 Mar;10(1):131-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-014-9657-3.