Bilgin Sevil, Temucin Cagrı Mesut, Nurlu Gulay, Kaya Derya Ozer, Kose Nezire, Gunduz Arzu Guclu
Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(3):261-6. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130374.
Segmental stabilization training and electrical stimulation are used as a treatment for patients with low back pain. There is limited information on the efficacy of two interventions in the literature. In this study, the efficacy of the two interventions on the multifidus muscle activation and fatigue, segmental stabilization training and electrical stimulation, were examined and compared.
Our sample consists of 30 asymptomatic individuals, randomly assigned to one of three groups: the group that was given segmental stabilization training, the group that was given electrical stimulation and the control group that received no treatment. The muscle activity and fatigability of the multifidus were recorded by the surface electromyography before and after the intervention.
No difference is detected for any of the multifidus muscle activation and fatigue characteristics either within or between groups.
Both techniques did not improve multifidus activation capacity. An effort at submaximal and maximal level affects and increases the activity of multifidus.
节段性稳定训练和电刺激被用作腰痛患者的一种治疗方法。文献中关于这两种干预措施疗效的信息有限。在本研究中，对节段性稳定训练和电刺激这两种干预措施对多裂肌激活和疲劳的疗效进行了检查和比较。
我们的样本由30名无症状个体组成，随机分为三组之一：接受节段性稳定训练的组、接受电刺激的组和未接受治疗的对照组。干预前后通过表面肌电图记录多裂肌的肌肉活动和疲劳性。
在组内或组间，多裂肌的任何激活和疲劳特征均未检测到差异。
两种技术均未改善多裂肌的激活能力。次最大和最大水平的努力会影响并增加多裂肌的活动。
