Department of Psychology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068210. Print 2013.
It has long been assumed that people treat cognitive effort as costly, but also that such effort costs may vary greatly across individuals. Individual differences in subjective effort could present a major and pervasive confound in behavioral and neuroscience assessments, by conflating cognitive ability with cognitive motivation. Self-report cognitive effort scales have been developed, but objective measures are lacking. In this study, we use the behavioral economic approach of revealed preferences to quantify subjective effort. Specifically, we adapted a well-established discounting paradigm to measure the extent to which cognitive effort causes participants to discount monetary rewards. The resulting metrics are sensitive to both within-individual factors, including objective load and reward amount, and between-individual factors, including age and trait cognitive engagement. We further validate cognitive effort discounting by benchmarking it against well-established measures of delay discounting. The results highlight the promise and utility of behavioral economic tools for assessing trait and state influences on cognitive motivation.
长期以来,人们一直认为人们认为认知努力是有代价的,但也认为这种努力成本在个体之间可能有很大的差异。个体差异的主观努力可能会在行为和神经科学评估中造成一个主要的和普遍的混淆,因为认知能力与认知动机混淆在一起。已经开发了自我报告的认知努力量表,但缺乏客观的测量方法。在这项研究中,我们使用了揭示偏好的行为经济学方法来量化主观努力。具体来说,我们改编了一个成熟的折扣范式来衡量认知努力导致参与者对金钱奖励的折扣程度。由此产生的指标对个体内部的因素(包括客观负荷和奖励金额)和个体之间的因素(包括年龄和特质认知参与)都很敏感。我们通过将认知努力折扣与已建立的延迟折扣测量方法进行基准测试,进一步验证了认知努力折扣的有效性。结果突出了行为经济学工具在评估特质和状态对认知动机的影响方面的潜力和实用性。