Suppr超能文献

患者-临床医生的民族一致性和心理健康就诊时的沟通。

Patient-clinician ethnic concordance and communication in mental health intake visits.

机构信息

Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Cambridge Health Alliance, Somerville, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Nov;93(2):188-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Jul 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study examines how communication patterns vary across racial and ethnic patient-clinician dyads in mental health intake sessions and its relation to continuance in treatment, defined as attending the next scheduled appointment.

METHODS

Observational study of communication patterns among ethnically/racially concordant and discordant patient-clinician dyads. Primary analysis included 93 patients with 38 clinicians in race/ethnic concordant and discordant dyads. Communication was coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and the Working Alliance Inventory Observer (WAI-O) bond scale; continuance in care was derived from chart reviews.

RESULTS

Latino concordant dyad patients were more verbally dominant (p<.05), engaged in more patient-centered communication (p<.05) and scored higher on the (WAI-O) bond scale (all p<.05) than other groups. Latino patients had higher continuance rates than other patients in models that adjusted for non-communication variables. When communication, global affect, and therapeutic process variables were adjusted for, differences were reversed and white dyad patients had higher continuance in care rates than other dyad patients.

CONCLUSION

Communication patterns seem to explain the role of ethnic concordance for continuance in care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Improve intercultural communication in cross cultural encounters appears significant for retaining minorities in care.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了心理健康初诊中,不同种族和民族的医患群体沟通模式的差异,以及这些差异与治疗延续性(定义为按时参加下一次预约)的关系。

方法

本研究采用观察性研究方法,对种族/民族一致和不一致的医患群体的沟通模式进行分析。主要分析包括 93 名患者和 38 名临床医生,他们来自种族/民族一致和不一致的医患群体。沟通使用 Roter 互动分析系统(RIAS)和工作联盟量表观察员(WAI-O)进行编码;治疗延续性通过病历回顾得出。

结果

与其他群体相比,拉丁裔一致群体的患者在语言上更具主导性(p<.05),更倾向于以患者为中心的沟通(p<.05),并且在(WAI-O)纽带量表上得分更高(所有 p<.05)。在调整非沟通变量的模型中,拉丁裔患者的继续治疗率高于其他患者。当调整沟通、整体情绪和治疗过程变量时,差异发生逆转,白人医患群体的继续治疗率高于其他医患群体。

结论

沟通模式似乎可以解释种族一致性对治疗延续性的作用。

实践意义

在跨文化接触中改善跨文化沟通对于留住少数族裔患者接受治疗至关重要。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
How missing information in diagnosis can lead to disparities in the clinical encounter.诊断中的信息缺失如何导致临床诊疗中的差异。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Nov;14 Suppl(Suppl):S26-35. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000338384.82436.0d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验