Infectious Disease Clinical Outcomes Research Unit, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Oct;57(10):5013-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00714-13. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
Bloodstream infections due to vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE-BSI) result in substantial patient mortality and cost. Daptomycin and linezolid are commonly prescribed for VRE-BSI, but there are no clinical trials to determine optimal antibiotic selection. We conducted a systematic review for investigations that compared daptomycin and linezolid for VRE-BSI. We searched Medline from 1966 through 2012 for comparisons of linezolid and daptomycin for VRE-BSI. We included searches of EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, and national meetings. Data were extracted using a standardized instrument. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects model. Our search yielded 4,243 publications, of which 482 contained data on VRE treatment. Most studies (452/482) did not present data on BSI or did not provide information on linezolid or daptomycin. Among the remaining 30 studies, 9 offered comparative data between the two agents. None were randomized clinical trials. There was no difference in microbiologic (n = 5 studies, 517 patients; OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.7; P = 0.95) and clinical (n = 3 studies, 357 patients; OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.0; P = 0.7) cures between the two antibiotics. There was a trend toward increased survival with linezolid compared to daptomycin treatment (n = 9 studies, 1,074 patients; OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.8; I(2) = 0 [where I(2) is a measure of inconsistency]), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.054). There are limited data to inform clinicians on optimal antibiotic selection for VRE-BSI. Available studies are limited by small sample size, lack of patient-level data, and inconsistent outcome definitions. Additional research, including randomized clinical trials, is needed before conclusions can be drawn about treatment options for VRE therapy.
万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)引起的血流感染会导致患者大量死亡和医疗费用增加。达托霉素和利奈唑胺常用于治疗 VRE 引起的血流感染,但目前尚无临床试验来确定最佳抗生素选择。我们进行了一项系统综述,以调查比较达托霉素和利奈唑胺治疗 VRE 引起的血流感染的研究。我们从 1966 年到 2012 年在 Medline 上搜索了比较利奈唑胺和达托霉素治疗 VRE 引起的血流感染的研究。我们还搜索了 EMBASE、clinicaltrials.gov 和全国性会议。使用标准化工具提取数据。使用固定效应模型计算汇总优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。我们的检索结果产生了 4243 篇出版物,其中 482 篇包含有关 VRE 治疗的数据。大多数研究(452/482)没有提供有关血流感染的数据,或者没有提供利奈唑胺或达托霉素的信息。在其余的 30 项研究中,有 9 项提供了两种药物之间的比较数据。没有随机临床试验。两种药物在微生物学疗效(n=5 项研究,517 例患者;OR,1.0;95%CI,0.4 至 1.7;P=0.95)和临床疗效(n=3 项研究,357 例患者;OR,1.2;95%CI,0.7 至 2.0;P=0.7)方面没有差异。与达托霉素治疗相比,利奈唑胺治疗的患者生存率呈增加趋势(n=9 项研究,1074 例患者;OR,1.3;95%CI,1.1 至 1.8;I²=0[其中 I²是不一致性的衡量标准]),但这没有达到统计学意义(P=0.054)。目前,关于 VRE-BSI 的最佳抗生素选择,可供临床医生参考的资料有限。现有研究受到样本量小、缺乏患者水平数据和结果定义不一致的限制。在得出关于 VRE 治疗的治疗选择的结论之前,需要进行包括随机临床试验在内的进一步研究。