Suppr超能文献

采用远程机器人导航系统进行左房峡部线消融:可行性、疗效和长期结果。

Left atrial isthmus line ablation using a remote robotic navigation system: feasibility, efficacy and long-term outcome.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Lohmühlenstr. 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany,

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2013 Dec;102(12):885-93. doi: 10.1007/s00392-013-0602-1. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Left atrial isthmus (LAI)-ablation in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) may improve outcomes in select patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, bidirectional LAI-block is difficult to obtain. No systematic evaluation reporting on the feasibility and efficacy of LAI-ablation using a robotic navigation system (RNS) exists.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this pilot study, CPVI combined with LAI-ablation were performed using a RNS and 3D-mapping system in 42 patients with persistent (n = 24, 57.1 %) or longstanding persistent AF. Ablation was performed using either a 3.5 mm irrigated tip catheter (ITC) with 6 (group-A, n = 16; max. 40 W, contact force 10-40 g) or (after a steam pop occurred in one patient) with a 4 mm ITC with 12 irrigation holes (group-B, n = 26; max. 30 W, contact force 10-30 g). Epicardial ablation was performed manually whenever bidirectional LAI-block could not be obtained with a maximum of 20 endocardial RF-applications. LAI-conduction block was achieved in all patients using RNS; in six patients (14.3 %), additional epicardial ablation was required to achieve LAI-block. A steam pop occurred during LAI-ablation resulting in cardiac tamponade in one patient in group-A. After a median follow-up period of 21 months, arrhythmia recurrence was seen in in 23/42 patients (18 patients with AF and 5 patients with atrial tachycardia) and repeat procedure was performed in 12 (28.6 %) patients; recovered LAI-conduction was found in 5/12 (41.7 %) patients. The RNS-group was compared to a historical group of 20 patients with manual LAI-ablation. Using RNS, LAI-block was more often achieved (42 (100 %) vs 16 (80 %), p < 0.01) and epicardial ablation was required in a significantly smaller number of patients (6 (14.3) vs 10 (50 %), p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LAI-ablation using RNS appears to be feasible in all patients. At repeat procedure, LAI-conduction can frequently occur; power and contact-force adaption appears to be mandatory to reduce the risk of complications. Using RNS, instead of a manual approach for LAI-line ablation may facilitate creation of a bidirectional LAI-block.

摘要

背景

在某些心房颤动(房颤)患者中,左心房间隔(LAI)消融联合环形肺静脉隔离(CPVI)可能改善预后。然而,双向 LAI 阻滞难以实现。目前尚无关于使用机器人导航系统(RNS)进行 LAI 消融的可行性和疗效的系统评价报告。

方法和结果

在这项初步研究中,42 例持续性(n=24,57.1%)或长期持续性房颤患者使用 RNS 和 3D 标测系统进行 CPVI 联合 LAI 消融。消融使用 3.5mm 灌流消融导管(ITC)(组 A,n=16;最大 40W,接触力 10-40g)或(在 1 例患者发生蒸汽爆破后)使用 4mm ITC 带有 12 个灌流孔(组 B,n=26;最大 30W,接触力 10-30g)进行。如果无法使用最大 20 次心内膜 RF 应用实现双向 LAI 阻滞,则手动进行心外膜消融。所有患者均使用 RNS 实现 LAI 传导阻滞;在 6 例患者(14.3%)中,需要额外的心外膜消融来实现 LAI 阻滞。在组 A 中,1 例患者在 LAI 消融过程中发生蒸汽爆破,导致心脏压塞。中位随访 21 个月后,42 例患者中有 23 例(18 例房颤和 5 例房性心动过速)出现心律失常复发,12 例(28.6%)患者进行了重复治疗;在 12 例患者中(50%)发现恢复的 LAI 传导。RNS 组与 20 例手动 LAI 消融的历史组进行了比较。使用 RNS,LAI 阻滞更常实现(42(100%)比 16(80%),p<0.01),并且需要进行心外膜消融的患者数量显著减少(6(14.3%)比 10(50%),p<0.01)。

结论

在所有患者中,使用 RNS 进行 LAI 消融似乎是可行的。在重复治疗时,LAI 传导经常发生;为了降低并发症风险,需要调整功率和接触力。与手动方法相比,使用 RNS 进行 LAI 线消融可能有助于建立双向 LAI 阻滞。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验