Estonian Institute for Population Studies, Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia.
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 30;3(7):e002695. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002695.
Evidence about the health and quality-of-life outcomes of injuries is obtained mainly from follow-up studies of surviving trauma patients; population-based studies are rarer, in particular for countries in Eastern Europe. This study examines the incidence, prevalence and social variation in non-fatal injuries resulting in activity limitations and outcomes of injuries in Estonia.
A retrospective population-based study.
Estonia.
7855 respondents of the face-to-face interviews of the second round of the Estonian Family and Fertility Survey conducted between 2004 and 2005 based on the nationally representative probability sample (n=11 192) of the resident population of Estonia aged 20-79.
The cumulative incidence and prevalence of injuries leading to activity limitations was estimated. Survival models were applied to analyse variations in the injury risk across sociodemographic groups. The association between injuries and the development of chronic conditions and quality of life was examined using survival and logistic regression models.
10% (95% CI 9.4 to 10.7) of the population aged 20-79 had experienced injuries leading to activity limitations; the prevalence of activity limitations due to injuries was 4.4% (95% CI 3.9% to 4.9%). Significant differences in injury risk were associated with gender, education, employment, marital status and nativity. Limiting injury was associated with a doubling of the likelihood of having chronic conditions (adjusted HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.58 to 2.46). Injury exhibited a statistically significant negative association with most quality-of-life measures. Although reduced, these effects persisted after recovery from activity limitations.
Substantial variation in injury risk across population groups suggests potential for prevention. Men and workers in manual occupations constitute major target groups for injury prevention in Estonia. The association of injury with the development of chronic conditions and reduced quality of life warrants further investigation.
关于伤害的健康和生活质量结果的证据主要来自对幸存创伤患者的随访研究;基于人群的研究较少,特别是在东欧国家。本研究调查了爱沙尼亚非致命性伤害导致活动受限的发生率、患病率和社会差异,以及伤害的结果。
回顾性基于人群的研究。
爱沙尼亚。
2004 年至 2005 年期间,根据爱沙尼亚居民人口的全国代表性概率样本(n=11192),对第二轮爱沙尼亚家庭和生育调查进行了面对面访谈,共有 7855 名受访者参加了调查。该样本包括年龄在 20-79 岁之间的人群。
估计了导致活动受限的伤害的累积发生率和患病率。生存模型被应用于分析不同社会人口群体之间的伤害风险差异。使用生存和逻辑回归模型分析了伤害与慢性疾病和生活质量的发展之间的关系。
20-79 岁人群中有 10%(95%CI 9.4 至 10.7)经历过导致活动受限的伤害;因伤害导致的活动受限的患病率为 4.4%(95%CI 3.9%至 4.9%)。伤害风险与性别、教育、就业、婚姻状况和出生有关。限制伤害与患慢性疾病的可能性增加一倍相关(调整后的 HR 1.97,95%CI 1.58 至 2.46)。伤害与大多数生活质量指标呈显著负相关。尽管有所减少,但这些影响在从活动受限中恢复后仍然存在。
人群中伤害风险的显著差异表明存在预防的可能性。男性和体力劳动者是爱沙尼亚伤害预防的主要目标群体。伤害与慢性疾病的发展和生活质量的降低之间的关联需要进一步研究。