• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于鉴定高度多样的蚁属 Pheidole(膜翅目:蚁科)物种的 DNA 条码。

DNA barcodes for species identification in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole (Formicidae: Myrmicinae).

机构信息

Department of Ecology, Animal Ecology Faculty of Biology Philipps-Universitaet Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Strasse 8, D-35032 Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Insect Sci. 2013;13:27. doi: 10.1673/031.013.2701.

DOI:10.1673/031.013.2701
PMID:23902257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3735075/
Abstract

DNA sequencing is increasingly being used to assist in species identification in order to overcome taxonomic impediment. However, few studies attempt to compare the results of these molecular studies with a more traditional species delineation approach based on morphological characters. Mitochondrial DNA Cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) gene was sequenced, measuring 636 base pairs, from 47 ants of the genus Pheidole (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) collected in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest to test whether the morphology-based assignment of individuals into species is supported by DNA-based species delimitation. Twenty morphospecies were identified, whereas the barcoding analysis identified 19 Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs). Fifteen out of the 19 DNA-based clusters allocated, using sequence divergence thresholds of 2% and 3%, matched with morphospecies. Both thresholds yielded the same number of MOTUs. Only one MOTU was successfully identified to species level using the CO1 sequences of Pheidole species already in the Genbank. The average pairwise sequence divergence for all 47 sequences was 19%, ranging between 0-25%. In some cases, however, morphology and molecular based methods differed in their assignment of individuals to morphospecies or MOTUs. The occurrence of distinct mitochondrial lineages within morphological species highlights groups for further detailed genetic and morphological studies, and therefore a pluralistic approach using several methods to understand the taxonomy of difficult lineages is advocated.

摘要

DNA 测序技术越来越多地被用于辅助物种鉴定,以克服分类学障碍。然而,很少有研究尝试将这些分子研究的结果与基于形态特征的更传统的物种划分方法进行比较。从在巴西大西洋森林中采集的 47 只铺道蚁属(蚁科:蚁亚科)蚂蚁中测序了线粒体 DNA 细胞色素氧化酶亚基 1(CO1)基因,长度为 636 个碱基对,以测试基于形态的个体物种分配是否得到基于 DNA 的物种划分的支持。鉴定出了 20 个形态种,而条形码分析则鉴定出了 19 个分子分类单元(MOTUs)。使用 2%和 3%的序列分歧阈值分配的 19 个 DNA 聚类中有 15 个与形态种相匹配。两种阈值都产生了相同数量的 MOTUs。只有一个 MOTU 可以通过已经在 Genbank 中的铺道蚁属 CO1 序列成功鉴定到种水平。所有 47 个序列的平均成对序列分歧为 19%,范围在 0-25%之间。然而,在某些情况下,形态学和分子学方法在将个体分配给形态种或 MOTUs 方面存在差异。形态种内存在独特的线粒体谱系突出了进一步进行详细遗传和形态学研究的群体,因此提倡使用多种方法来理解困难谱系的分类学,采用多元化的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/313f455f35e0/f04_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/889414f9937f/f01_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/4c58b314d3b3/f02_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/63f14b8ee393/f03_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/313f455f35e0/f04_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/889414f9937f/f01_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/4c58b314d3b3/f02_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/63f14b8ee393/f03_01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f88/3735075/313f455f35e0/f04_01.jpg

相似文献

1
DNA barcodes for species identification in the hyperdiverse ant genus Pheidole (Formicidae: Myrmicinae).用于鉴定高度多样的蚁属 Pheidole(膜翅目:蚁科)物种的 DNA 条码。
J Insect Sci. 2013;13:27. doi: 10.1673/031.013.2701.
2
Single-locus DNA barcoding and species delimitation of the sandfly subgenus Evandromyia (Aldamyia).单基因座 DNA 条形码与沙蝇亚属 Evandromyia(Aldamyia)的物种界定。
Med Vet Entomol. 2020 Dec;34(4):420-431. doi: 10.1111/mve.12458. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
3
Morphology, nuclear SNPs and mate selection reveal that COI barcoding overestimates species diversity in a Mediterranean freshwater amphipod by an order of magnitude.形态学、核单核苷酸多态性和配偶选择表明,细胞色素氧化酶亚基I(COI)条形码技术将一种地中海淡水端足类动物的物种多样性高估了一个数量级。
Cladistics. 2023 Apr;39(2):129-143. doi: 10.1111/cla.12520. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
Mind the gap! Integrating taxonomic approaches to assess ant diversity at the southern extreme of the Atlantic Forest.注意差距!整合分类学方法以评估大西洋森林南端的蚂蚁多样性。
Ecol Evol. 2017 Nov 10;7(23):10451-10466. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3549. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
DNA barcoding of the genus Gampsocleis (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) from China.中国棘蝗属(直翅目,蝗总科)的 DNA 条形码研究。
Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2024 Jan;115(1):e22070. doi: 10.1002/arch.22070.
6
DNA barcoding for effective biodiversity assessment of a hyperdiverse arthropod group: the ants of Madagascar.DNA条形码技术用于马达加斯加超多样节肢动物类群(蚂蚁)的有效生物多样性评估
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1825-34. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1714.
7
Fast Census of Moth Diversity in the Neotropics: A Comparison of Field-Assigned Morphospecies and DNA Barcoding in Tiger Moths.新热带界蛾类多样性的快速普查:虎蛾中野外指定形态物种与DNA条形码的比较
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 9;11(2):e0148423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148423. eCollection 2016.
8
The ant genus Rhopalomastix (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae) in Southeast Asia, with descriptions of four new species from Singapore based on morphology and DNA barcoding.东南亚的棒胸蚁属(膜翅目:蚁科:切叶蚁亚科),基于形态学和DNA条形码对来自新加坡的四个新物种的描述
Zootaxa. 2018 Dec 19;4532(3):301-340. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4532.3.1.
9
Singleton molecular species delimitation based on COI-5P barcode sequences revealed high cryptic/undescribed diversity for Chinese katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).基于 COI-5P 条码序列的单分子种划分揭示了中国螽斯(直翅目:螽斯科)的高隐/未描述多样性。
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1404-5.
10
DNA Barcoding of genus Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in the Brazilian Amazon.巴西亚马逊地区吸血蠓属(双翅目:蠓科)的 DNA 条形码研究。
Acta Trop. 2022 Nov;235:106619. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106619. Epub 2022 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploration for Asian longhorned beetle parasitoids in Korea using an improved sentinel log trap.利用改良的诱木陷阱在韩国对亚洲长角天牛寄生蜂进行探查。
Parasite. 2023;30:57. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2023062. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
2
ONTbarcoder and MinION barcodes aid biodiversity discovery and identification by everyone, for everyone.ONT 条码和 MinION 条码通过每个人为每个人助力生物多样性的发现和鉴定。
BMC Biol. 2021 Sep 29;19(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01141-x.
3
Molecular phylogenetic analysis and morphological reassessments of thief ants identify a new potential case of biological invasions.

本文引用的文献

1
The integrative future of taxonomy.分类学的综合未来。
Front Zool. 2010 May 25;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-7-16.
2
Loss of functional diversity of ant assemblages in secondary tropical forests.次生热带森林中蚂蚁类群功能多样性的丧失。
Ecology. 2010 Mar;91(3):782-92. doi: 10.1890/08-1276.1.
3
Morphological and molecular variation in tiger beetles of the Cicindela hybrida complex: is an 'integrative taxonomy' possible?杂交虎甲复合体(Cicindela hybrida complex)虎甲的形态学和分子变异:“综合分类学”是否可行?
分子系统发育分析和形态学再评估表明,贼蚁可能是一个新的潜在生物入侵案例。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 21;10(1):12040. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69029-4.
4
Transcriptome profiling of venom gland from wasp species: de novo assembly, functional annotation, and discovery of molecular markers.蜂类毒液腺转录组谱分析:从头组装、功能注释及分子标记发现。
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jun 24;21(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-06851-0.
5
DNA barcoding of the fire ant genus Westwood (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Riyadh region, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯王国利雅得地区韦斯特伍德火蚁属(膜翅目:蚁科)的DNA条形码分析
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Jan;27(1):184-188. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
6
DNA barcoding of aphid-associated ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a subtropical area of southern China.中国南方亚热带地区与蚜虫共生的蚂蚁(膜翅目,蚁科)的DNA条形码分析
Zookeys. 2019 Oct 9;879:117-136. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.879.29705. eCollection 2019.
7
Molecular operational taxonomic units of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in high Andean mountain ecosystems of Antioquia, Colombia.在哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚的高安第斯山脉生态系统中采集的蚊子(双翅目:蚊科)的分子操作分类单元
Zootaxa. 2017 Jun 19;4277(3):369-385. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4277.3.3.
8
Does early learning drive ecological divergence during speciation processes in parasitoid wasps?在寄生蜂的物种形成过程中,早期学习是否会推动生态分化?
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 22;282(1799):20141850. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1850.
9
DNA barcoding and the differentiation between North American and West European Phormia regina (Diptera, Calliphoridae, Chrysomyinae).DNA条形码技术与北美和西欧丽蝇(双翅目,丽蝇科,金蝇亚科)的区分
Zookeys. 2013 Dec 30(365):149-74. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.365.6202.
Mol Ecol. 2009 Feb;18(4):648-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04048.x. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
4
Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections.通过自然史、DNA条形码、形态学和标本采集的迭代整合揭示的热带寄生蜂的极端多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 26;105(34):12359-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805319105. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
5
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0.MEGA4:分子进化遗传学分析(MEGA)软件版本4.0。
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1596-9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. Epub 2007 May 7.
6
A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification.从基因组角度看线粒体DNA用于“条形码”识别的不足之处。
J Hered. 2006 Nov-Dec;97(6):581-94. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esl036. Epub 2006 Nov 29.
7
DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success.双翅目昆虫的DNA条形码与分类学:一个种内高变异性和低鉴定成功率的故事。
Syst Biol. 2006 Oct;55(5):715-28. doi: 10.1080/10635150600969864.
8
Utility of mitochondrial DNA barcodes in species conservation.线粒体DNA条形码在物种保护中的作用
Conserv Biol. 2006 Aug;20(4):1026-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00372.x.
9
DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera.DNA条形码可区分热带鳞翅目昆虫的物种。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 24;103(4):968-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510466103. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
10
DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling.DNA条形码:基于全面采样的错误率
PLoS Biol. 2005 Dec;3(12):e422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422. Epub 2005 Nov 29.