Miyamoto Hiroshi, Maeno Koichiro, Uno Koki, Kakutani Kenichiro, Nishida Kotaro, Sumi Masatoshi
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kinki University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan,
Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):341-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2923-1. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
The surgical strategy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) accompanying local kyphosis is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to compare and evaluate the outcomes of two types of surgery for CSM accompanying local kyphosis: (1) laminoplasty alone (LP) and (2) posterior reconstruction surgery (PR) in which we corrected the local kyphosis using a pedicle screw or lateral mass screw.
Sixty patients who presented with local kyphosis exceeding 5° were enrolled. LP and PR were each performed on a group of 30 of these patients; 30 CSM patients without local kyphosis, who had undergone LP, were used as controls. The follow-up period was 2 years or longer. Preoperative local kyphosis angles in LP and PR were 8.3° ± 4.4° and 8.8° ± 5.7°, respectively. Preoperative C2-7 angles in LP, PR and controls were -1.7° ± 9.6°, -0.4° ± 7.2° and -12.0° ± 5.6°, respectively. The recovery rate of the JOA score, local kyphosis angle and C2-7 angle at post-op and follow-up were compared between the groups.
The recovery rate of the JOA score in the LP group (32.6 %) was significantly worse than that in the PR group (44.5 %) and that of controls (53.8 %). Local kyphosis angles in the PR and LP groups at follow-up were 4.0° ± 8.6° and 8.0° ± 6.0°, respectively. However, although the C2-7 angle at follow-up was improved to -11.1° ± 12.7° in PR, and maintained at -11.6° ± 6.2° in controls, it deteriorated to 0.5° ± 12.7° in LP.
The present study is the first to compare the outcomes between LP alone and PR for CSM accompanying local kyphosis. It revealed that PR resulted in a better clinical outcome than did LP alone. This result may be due to reduction of local kyphosis, stabilization of the unstable segment, and/or the maintenance of C2-7 angle until follow-up in the PR group.
伴有局部后凸的脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)的手术策略存在争议。本研究的目的是比较和评估两种治疗伴有局部后凸的CSM的手术效果:(1)单纯椎板成形术(LP)和(2)后路重建手术(PR),我们使用椎弓根螺钉或侧块螺钉矫正局部后凸。
纳入60例局部后凸超过5°的患者。在其中30例患者中分别进行LP和PR;30例未伴有局部后凸的CSM患者接受了LP手术,作为对照组。随访期为2年或更长时间。LP组和PR组术前局部后凸角分别为8.3°±4.4°和8.8°±5.7°。LP组、PR组和对照组术前C2-7角分别为-1.7°±9.6°、-0.4°±7.2°和-12.0°±5.6°。比较各组术后及随访时JOA评分、局部后凸角和C2-7角的恢复率。
LP组JOA评分的恢复率(32.6%)明显低于PR组(44.5%)和对照组(53.8%)。随访时PR组和LP组的局部后凸角分别为4.0°±8.6°和8.0°±6.0°。然而,尽管PR组随访时C2-7角改善至-11.1°±12.7°,对照组维持在-11.6°±6.2°,但LP组却恶化为0.5°±12.7°。
本研究首次比较了单纯LP和PR治疗伴有局部后凸的CSM的效果。结果显示,PR的临床效果优于单纯LP。这一结果可能是由于PR组局部后凸的减轻、不稳定节段的稳定和/或随访时C2-7角的维持。