Microbiology Laboratory, Laboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Carrer de la Selva, 10, Edifici Inblau A. Parc de Negocis Mas Blau, 08820, El Prat de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain,
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3672-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3200-7. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
The outcome of revision surgery depends on accurate determination of the cause of prosthesis failure because treatment differs profoundly among aseptic loosening, mechanical failure, and prosthetic joint infections (PJI).
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to determine (1) the predictive role of the interval from primary to revision surgery in determining the reason for prosthesis failure of a hip, knee, shoulder, or elbow arthroplasty, and (2) whether positive cultures during revision surgery for aseptic loosening were associated with shorter event-free survival of the prosthesis.
All patients undergoing revision surgery between July 2010 and January 2012 were included in a prospective cohort of 112 patients, and were classified as having had failure from aseptic loosening (56%), mechanical failure (15%), or PJI (29%). To make the diagnosis of PJI, at surgery we used a standardized enhanced diagnostic approach in all patients including sampling of five periprosthetic tissue specimens, sonication of removed prosthetic components, prolonged incubation of aerobic and anaerobic cultures, and multiplex PCR of sonication fluid in aseptic loosening cases. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed.
The median time from primary to revision surgery was (p < 0.001) longer for patients with aseptic loosening (7.8 years) than for patients with mechanical failure (1.6 years) or PJI (2 years). No difference in the time to revision was observed for patients with aseptic loosening with positive or negative microbiological cultures (p = 0.594). Propionibacterium acnes was cultured below the established microbiological criteria for positivity in 12 (19%) procedures that had been presumed to have been revisions for aseptic loosening.
PJI should be considered in all revisions performed within 2 years of implantation even in the absence of clinical or laboratory findings suggestive for infection. However, the growth of low-virulence microorganisms below the cut-off in revisions for apparent aseptic loosening is not associated with early prosthesis failure.
翻修手术的结果取决于对假体失败原因的准确判断,因为无菌性松动、机械故障和人工关节感染(PJI)的治疗方法有很大的不同。
问题/目的:我们旨在确定(1)从初次手术到翻修手术的时间间隔对髋关节、膝关节、肩关节或肘关节置换术后假体失败原因的预测作用,以及(2)在无菌性松动的翻修手术中,培养阳性是否与假体的无事件生存率缩短有关。
在 2010 年 7 月至 2012 年 1 月期间接受翻修手术的所有患者均被纳入一项前瞻性队列研究,共 112 例患者,分为无菌性松动(56%)、机械故障(15%)或 PJI(29%)。为了诊断 PJI,我们在所有患者中使用了一种标准化的增强诊断方法,包括五个假体周围组织标本的取样、去除的假体部件的超声处理、有氧和厌氧培养的延长孵育以及无菌性松动病例的超声液的多重 PCR。进行 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 比例风险回归分析。
与机械故障(1.6 年)或 PJI(2 年)患者相比,无菌性松动患者从初次手术到翻修手术的中位时间(p<0.001)更长。在无菌性松动患者中,培养阳性或阴性的微生物学对翻修时间没有影响(p=0.594)。在 12 例(19%)被认为是无菌性松动翻修的手术中,低于既定微生物学阳性标准的痤疮丙酸杆菌被培养出来。
即使在没有临床或实验室发现提示感染的情况下,对于植入后 2 年内进行的所有翻修手术,都应考虑 PJI。然而,在明显无菌性松动的翻修中,低毒力微生物的生长低于截止值与假体早期失效无关。