• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康记录数据在基层医疗环境中识别慢性疼痛患者。

Using electronic health records data to identify patients with chronic pain in a primary care setting.

机构信息

Weitzman Quality Institute, Community Health Center, Inc., Middletown, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e275-80. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001856. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001856
PMID:23904323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3861913/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate an accurate method to identify patients with chronic pain using electronic health records (EHR) data at a multisite community health center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients with chronic pain in our EHR system using readily available data elements pertaining to pain: diagnostic codes (International Classification of Disease, revision 9; ICD-9), patient-reported pain scores, and opioid prescription medications. Medical chart reviews were used to evaluate the accuracy of these data elements in all of their combinations. We developed an algorithm to identify chronic pain patients more accurately based on these evaluations. The algorithm's results were validated for accuracy by comparing them with the documentation of chronic pain by the patient's treating clinician in 381 random patient charts.

RESULTS

The new algorithm, which combines pain scores, prescription medications, and ICD-9 codes, has a sensitivity and specificity of 84.8% and 97.7%, respectively. The algorithm was more accurate (95.0%) than pain scores (88.7%) or ICD-9 codes (93.2%) alone. The receiver operating characteristic was 0.981.

DISCUSSION

A straightforward method for identifying chronic pain patients solely using structured electronic data does not exist because individual data elements, such as pain scores or ICD-9 codes, are not sufficiently accurate. We developed and validated an algorithm that uses a combination of elements to identify chronic pain patients accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

We derived a useful method that combines readily available elements from an EHR to identify chronic pain with high accuracy. This method should prove useful to those interested in identifying chronic pain patients in large datasets for research, evaluation or quality improvement purposes.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种准确的方法,以利用多地点社区健康中心的电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据识别慢性疼痛患者。

材料与方法

我们使用与疼痛相关的现成数据元素(诊断代码[国际疾病分类,第 9 修订版;ICD-9]、患者报告的疼痛评分和阿片类药物处方)在我们的 EHR 系统中识别慢性疼痛患者。使用病历回顾来评估这些数据元素在其所有组合中的准确性。我们根据这些评估开发了一种更准确识别慢性疼痛患者的算法。通过将其与 381 份随机患者病历中患者治疗医生记录的慢性疼痛文档进行比较,验证该算法的准确性。

结果

新算法结合了疼痛评分、处方药物和 ICD-9 代码,其灵敏度和特异性分别为 84.8%和 97.7%。该算法比疼痛评分(88.7%)或 ICD-9 代码(93.2%)更准确(95.0%)。受试者工作特征曲线为 0.981。

讨论

仅使用结构化电子数据识别慢性疼痛患者的简单方法并不存在,因为单独的数据元素(如疼痛评分或 ICD-9 代码)不够准确。我们开发并验证了一种使用组合元素准确识别慢性疼痛患者的算法。

结论

我们得出了一种有用的方法,该方法结合了 EHR 中易于获取的元素,以高精度识别慢性疼痛。对于那些有兴趣在大型数据集(用于研究、评估或质量改进目的)中识别慢性疼痛患者的人来说,这种方法应该很有用。

相似文献

1
Using electronic health records data to identify patients with chronic pain in a primary care setting.利用电子健康记录数据在基层医疗环境中识别慢性疼痛患者。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Dec;20(e2):e275-80. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001856. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Evaluation of an Algorithm for Identifying Ocular Conditions in Electronic Health Record Data.评估一种在电子健康记录数据中识别眼部疾病的算法。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 May 1;137(5):491-497. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.7051.
3
Identifying individuals with physician-diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care electronic medical records: a retrospective chart abstraction study.在初级保健电子病历中识别经医生诊断的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者:一项回顾性图表提取研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 May 15;27(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41533-017-0035-9.
4
Accuracy of phenotyping chronic rhinosinusitis in the electronic health record.电子健康记录中慢性鼻窦炎表型分型的准确性。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(2):140-4. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2014.28.4012.
5
Rule-based and machine learning algorithms identify patients with systemic sclerosis accurately in the electronic health record.基于规则和机器学习算法可在电子健康记录中准确识别系统性硬化症患者。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Dec 30;21(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2092-7.
6
A data extraction algorithm for assessment of contraceptive counseling and provision.一种用于评估避孕咨询和提供服务的数据分析算法。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):333.e1-333.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.578. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
Using natural language processing to identify opioid use disorder in electronic health record data.利用自然语言处理技术在电子健康记录数据中识别阿片类药物使用障碍。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Feb;170:104963. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104963. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
8
Optimizing research in symptomatic uterine fibroids with development of a computable phenotype for use with electronic health records.优化有症状的子宫纤维瘤的研究,开发可计算的表型,用于电子健康记录。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):610.e1-610.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Development and validation of an electronic health records-based opioid use disorder algorithm by expert clinical adjudication among patients with prescribed opioids.基于专家临床裁定的电子健康记录阿片类药物使用障碍算法在处方阿片类药物患者中的开发和验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 May;32(5):577-585. doi: 10.1002/pds.5591. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
10
Identifying patients with opioid use disorder using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes: Challenges and opportunities.利用国际疾病分类(ICD)代码识别阿片类药物使用障碍患者:挑战与机遇。
Addiction. 2024 Jan;119(1):160-168. doi: 10.1111/add.16338. Epub 2023 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of maintenance doses of opioid agonist treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder: a target trial emulation protocol using a population-based observational study.阿片类药物使用障碍患者中阿片类激动剂维持剂量的比较有效性:一项基于人群的观察性研究的目标试验模拟方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e098439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098439.
2
Leveraging undecided cases in chart-reviewed phenotypes to enhance EHR-based association studies.利用图表审查表型中的不确定病例来加强基于电子健康记录的关联研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Jun;166:104839. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104839. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
3
Implementation of a novel pain coach educator program in a safety-net emergency department.在一家安全网急诊科实施一项新型疼痛指导教育项目。
Implement Res Pract. 2025 Apr 4;6:26334895251330511. doi: 10.1177/26334895251330511. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Latent class analysis identifies distinct pain phenotypes in newly diagnosed systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.潜在类别分析确定了新诊断的全身型幼年特发性关节炎中的不同疼痛表型。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2025 Mar 31;27(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03534-7.
5
Uptake of Low-dose Buprenorphine Initiation and Associated Patient Characteristics in British Columbia, Canada: A Population-based Cohort Study.加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省低剂量丁丙诺啡起始治疗的接受情况及相关患者特征:一项基于人群的队列研究
J Addict Med. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001483.
6
Refining chronic pain phenotypes: A comparative analysis of sociodemographic and disease-related determinants using electronic health records.细化慢性疼痛表型:使用电子健康记录对社会人口统计学和疾病相关决定因素进行比较分析。
J Pain. 2025 Mar;28:104775. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.104775. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
7
Occurrence of Opioid-Related Neurocognitive Symptoms Associated With Long-term Opioid Therapy.与长期阿片类药物治疗相关的阿片类药物所致神经认知症状的发生情况。
Clin J Pain. 2025 Feb 1;41(2):e1266. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001266.
8
The Combined Relationship of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Enactment and Medical Cannabis Laws with Chronic Pain-Related Healthcare Visits.处方药监测计划的制定与医用大麻法律与慢性疼痛相关医疗就诊的综合关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1030-1038. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09053-6. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
9
The burden of chronic pain in transgender and gender diverse populations: Evidence from a large US clinical database.跨性别和性别多样化人群中的慢性疼痛负担:来自美国大型临床数据库的证据。
Eur J Pain. 2025 Feb;29(2):e4725. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4725. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
10
Assessment of Sports Concussion in Female Athletes: A Role for Neuroinformatics?女性运动员的运动性脑震荡评估:神经信息学的作用?
Neuroinformatics. 2024 Oct;22(4):607-618. doi: 10.1007/s12021-024-09680-8. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care providers' views on chronic pain management among high-risk patients in safety net settings.基层医疗服务提供者在安全网环境下对高风险患者慢性疼痛管理的看法。
Pain Med. 2012 Sep;13(9):1141-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01443.x. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
2
Using electronic health records to improve quality and efficiency: the experiences of leading hospitals.利用电子健康记录提高质量和效率:领先医院的经验。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Jul;17:1-40.
3
Patient satisfaction, prescription drug abuse, and potential unintended consequences.患者满意度、处方药滥用及潜在的意外后果。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 4;307(13):1377-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.419.
4
Clinical characteristics and patterns of healthcare utilization in patients with painful neuropathic disorders in UK general practice: a retrospective cohort study.英国普通实践中疼痛性神经病理性疾病患者的临床特征和医疗保健利用模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Neurol. 2012 Mar 6;12:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-8.
5
Alleviating suffering 101--pain relief in the United States.缓解疼痛基础教程——美国的疼痛缓解
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):197-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109084.
6
Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring.电子健康记录衍生的质量测量在绩效监测中的有效性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):604-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000557. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
7
Bending the prescription opioid dosing and mortality curves: impact of the Washington State opioid dosing guideline.弯曲处方类阿片药物剂量与死亡率曲线:华盛顿州类阿片药物剂量指南的影响。
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Apr;55(4):325-31. doi: 10.1002/ajim.21998. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
8
Identifying neck and back pain in administrative data: defining the right cohort.在管理数据中识别颈部和背部疼痛:定义合适的队列。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):860-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182376508.
9
A diabetes dashboard and physician efficiency and accuracy in accessing data needed for high-quality diabetes care.糖尿病数据仪表盘与医生获取高质量糖尿病护理所需数据的效率和准确性。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;9(5):398-405. doi: 10.1370/afm.1286.
10
Long-term opioid therapy reconsidered.重新考虑长期阿片类药物治疗。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Sep 6;155(5):325-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-5-201109060-00011.